Brand gets 8 points and £3500 fine for two speeding offences

Brand gets 8 points and £3500 fine for two speeding offences

Author
Discussion

LunarOne

Original Poster:

6,303 posts

151 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqlqpe7e7jo

According to the article, he was caught twice, once doing 37 in a 30 and once doing 95 in a 70. Looks like he's received pretty much the maximum fine for each offence (£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads). Ouch!

BBC News said:
The 49-year-old was caught driving his Mini at 95mph on the M4 near Slough on 16 June 2024. He also drove the car at 37mph in a 30mph zone in Shiplake, near his Oxfordshire home, on 23 March, High Wycombe Magistrates' Court heard. The former Radio 2 presenter was fined £3,457 and handed eight points on his licence. Brand, who did not attend the short hearing, was given three penalty points for the 37mph breach and five for the other."

Simpo Two

88,870 posts

279 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
LunarOne said:
£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads
£1,000 fine for doing 37 in a 30?

I am alright Jack

4,010 posts

157 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
More to that than has been reported. Both fixed penalties with one a possible speed awareness course if criteria was met.

I'm guessing that being a fool he's done something silly like not replying so things have escalated.

Aretnap

1,844 posts

165 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
£1,000 fine for doing 37 in a 30?
If he didn't accept the course or the fixed penalty he was almost certainly offered, his fine on conviction will be calculated as a percentage of his weekly income, up to the statutory maximum (£1000).

If all those YouTube videos are bringing in megabucks then even a fine for a minor offence will easily hit the maximum.

MickC

1,068 posts

272 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Aretnap said:
If all those YouTube videos are bringing in megabucks then even a fine for a minor offence will easily hit the maximum.
And not care a jot about £1000.

miniman

28,017 posts

276 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
LunarOne said:
£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads
£1,000 fine for doing 37 in a 30?
Let's be honest, if you had the opportunity to give him a slap in any possible way, you'd take it right?

agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
LunarOne said:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqlqpe7e7jo

According to the article, he was caught twice, once doing 37 in a 30 and once doing 95 in a 70. Looks like he's received pretty much the maximum fine for each offence (£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads). Ouch!

BBC News said:
The 49-year-old was caught driving his Mini at 95mph on the M4 near Slough on 16 June 2024. He also drove the car at 37mph in a 30mph zone in Shiplake, near his Oxfordshire home, on 23 March, High Wycombe Magistrates' Court heard. The former Radio 2 presenter was fined £3,457 and handed eight points on his licence. Brand, who did not attend the short hearing, was given three penalty points for the 37mph breach and five for the other."
The article is lacking detail. Was the £3457 “fine”

a) fines only; or

b) fine x2, 40% surcharge x2, and prosecution costs?

I suspect b.




agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Aretnap said:
If he didn't accept the course or the fixed penalty he was almost certainly offered, his fine on conviction will be calculated as a percentage of his weekly income, up to the statutory maximum (£1000).

If all those YouTube videos are bringing in megabucks then even a fine for a minor offence will easily hit the maximum.
Not if you plead guilty.

agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Another article:

“Brand was issued with fines totaling £2341, he was ordered to pay costs of £180, and must also stump up £936 in victim surcharges.”

£738 fine and £1560 fine?

If assumptions and maths correct then 73% and 62% of the maximum respectively.

I would have advised him to expect £666 and £1666. Total £2332.



Edited by agtlaw on Thursday 9th January 15:42

anonymous-user

68 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
He still thinks he's exempt from the rules then.

Panamax

6,077 posts

48 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Brand was charged with,
  • the two counts of speeding, and
  • two counts of failing to inform the police whether he or someone else was driving the car.

Terminator X

17,608 posts

218 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Why didn't he take the standard fine for the 37 heinous crime? £100 or so.

TX.

Terminator X

17,608 posts

218 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
I am alright Jack said:
More to that than has been reported. Both fixed penalties with one a possible speed awareness course if criteria was met.

I'm guessing that being a fool he's done something silly like not replying so things have escalated.
95 won't be a fixed penalty Shirley?

TX.

agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
95 won't be a fixed penalty Shirley?

TX.
Wrong.

agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Panamax said:
Brand was charged with,
  • the two counts of speeding, and
  • two counts of failing to inform the police whether he or someone else was driving the car.
And pleaded guilty to speeding only.

Counts is the crown court. You mean charges.

Edited by agtlaw on Thursday 9th January 15:58

agtlaw

7,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Why didn't he take the standard fine for the 37 heinous crime? £100 or so.

TX.
There isn’t a “standard fine.”

37/30 mph is often a course. Otherwise a £100 fixed penalty with 3 points.


skyebear

888 posts

20 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Wrong.
Every time I read this I just hear Arnie's voice!



Simpo Two

88,870 posts

279 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
miniman said:
Simpo Two said:
LunarOne said:
£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads
£1,000 fine for doing 37 in a 30?
Let's be honest, if you had the opportunity to give him a slap in any possible way, you'd take it right?
I dislike him greatly, but the law should treat him the same as anyone else.

If he was indeed a tit and ignored the usual offerings as 'agtlaw' says, then fair enough. He would see this as a mark of greatness, while everyone else thinks 'what a tit'.

martinbiz

3,574 posts

159 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
miniman said:
Simpo Two said:
LunarOne said:
£2500 for motorways and £1000 for other roads
£1,000 fine for doing 37 in a 30?
Let's be honest, if you had the opportunity to give him a slap in any possible way, you'd take it right?
I dislike him greatly, but the law should treat him the same as anyone else.
Why do you assume it didn't?

martinbiz

3,574 posts

159 months

Thursday 9th January
quotequote all
Panamax said:
Brand was charged with,
  • the two counts of speeding, and
  • two counts of failing to inform the police whether he or someone else was driving the car.
Where did you dig the failing to give information nugget up from?