Porting internet to another provider without permission
Discussion
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
Taz1111 said:
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
You'll have to rewrite that, slowly and carefully, so that we understand what you are talking about. "The other party"...?The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
Taz1111 said:
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
...
If there are regular parties that interfere with living at the property, contact the council's noise abatement team. Or if it's an illegal rave, the police have powers to act (I believe) under the public order act.The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
...
Giving permission for other family members to attend the party is irrelevant.
You should probably just move.
Taz1111 said:
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
I'm not sure what the question was but I am pretty confident the answer is 11.The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
geeks said:
Taz1111 said:
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
I'm not sure what the question was but I am pretty confident the answer is 11.The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
Racing Newt said:
geeks said:
Taz1111 said:
Hi all, currently in a situation where a property isn't yet registered entirely in 1 of my parents names. A transfer document and document were fully signed 10 years ago. They weren't filed for a number of reasons, but they are now with a solicitor.
The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
I'm not sure what the question was but I am pretty confident the answer is 11.The other party is interfering, living at the property (not in the house), and has given permission for other family members to be there.
My understanding is that with that TR1 document along with clear wording that the outgoing party has no claim in the property from the date that letter was signed, that the outgoing party shouldn't be there and is trespassing. If someone can correct me here please feel free.
Now one of the people the outgoing party has allowed to be at the property has started a transfer of the internet into a contract of their own. I have called both providers, neither say they can cancel it, and I need LPA for the individual who has setup the new contract to cancel it! I find this pretty remarkable.
Has anyone had any experience with this last point, or any of this in general? I have LPA for the homeowner, but it's hard to know what to do, and the solicitor isn't fully upto speed with everything. It's essentially me against the rest of my family, which is quite difficult to take on, but I understand that I should be doing things in the best interests of the property owner, not myself.
Thankyou all
Sometimes the answer is 42…
This is the one about cats s
tting in your garden isn't it?
They don't like water sprays or spicy fragrance.
Or you can piss all over your fences.
Which every man should do regularly anyway.
It's part of what it is to be British.
Bet SQS does it all the time at number 10.
Or Lord Ali pays someone to do it for him etc.
tting in your garden isn't it?They don't like water sprays or spicy fragrance.
Or you can piss all over your fences.
Which every man should do regularly anyway.
It's part of what it is to be British.
Bet SQS does it all the time at number 10.
Or Lord Ali pays someone to do it for him etc.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff