New M6 speed cameras?
Author
Discussion

tomj_

Original Poster:

37 posts

79 months

Saturday 13th December 2025
quotequote all
There seem to be some new cameras which have gone up on the M6 northbound near junction 18. One set on the previous HADECs arm, then another about a mile or so down the road on their own pole. Anyone got the foggiest? Photos below.




Whist I have seen some newer and more 'armoured' HADECs going up on both the M1 and the M6 in places recently, these are very different.

Something to stop speeding up between camera gantries with speed restrictions?

CLK-GTR

1,655 posts

267 months

Saturday 13th December 2025
quotequote all
Looks like the new Vector SR cash machines that dont flash.

irc

9,280 posts

158 months

Saturday 13th December 2025
quotequote all
Similar to half a dozen set up around Glasgow on urban roads.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/NNveRTN9SZxhaJCPA

"Shona Gaffney
Police Scotland website says "The new Vector SR spot speed cameras are fully contained traffic enforcement systems which differ from the more traditional fixed Gatso speed cameras. The cameras use tracking radar for spot speed enforcement and have multi lane coverage, meaning they can enforce traffic travelling in both directions. The system uses infra-red technology which allows images to be captured without the need for camera flash'."

2020vision

629 posts

18 months

Sunday 14th December 2025
quotequote all
CLK-GTR said:
Looks like the new Vector SR cash machines that dont flash.
No they don’t
The only similarity is the colour.

CLK-GTR

1,655 posts

267 months

Sunday 14th December 2025
quotequote all
2020vision said:
CLK-GTR said:
Looks like the new Vector SR cash machines that dont flash.
No they don t
The only similarity is the colour.
And the two cameras and the two radar panels. And the pole. Nothing else similar at all.

Billy Eyelash

848 posts

230 months

Sunday 14th December 2025
quotequote all
If the cameras' purpose is deterrence, then the lack of a visible flash makes them less effective.

GiantEnemyCrab

7,916 posts

225 months

Sunday 14th December 2025
quotequote all
Thank goodness the people deciding to improve our lives in such fashion are elected, consider the implications of their actions and have a good pot of money to spend on this mission critical stuff.

Thank goodness.

Terminator X

19,313 posts

226 months

Sunday 14th December 2025
quotequote all
irc said:
Similar to half a dozen set up around Glasgow on urban roads.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/NNveRTN9SZxhaJCPA

"Shona Gaffney
Police Scotland website says "The new Vector SR spot speed cameras are fully contained traffic enforcement systems which differ from the more traditional fixed Gatso speed cameras. The cameras use tracking radar for spot speed enforcement and have multi lane coverage, meaning they can enforce traffic travelling in both directions. The system uses infra-red technology which allows images to be captured without the need for camera flash'."
Might shock some people coming the other way!

Previous IR camera's used to glow purple at night, so you could tell if they were on or not eg dummy camera's used to be a thing.

TX.

whimsical ninja

251 posts

49 months

Tuesday 16th December 2025
quotequote all
Billy Eyelash said:
If the cameras' purpose is deterrence, then the lack of a visible flash makes them less effective.
I would have thought the big sign on the front of the pole was the deterrent. Anything else is just Darwinian

abzmike

11,133 posts

128 months

Tuesday 16th December 2025
quotequote all
Bit like the average speed cameras on the A90 between Dundee and Aberdeen.

Glenn63

3,714 posts

106 months

Tuesday 16th December 2025
quotequote all
They are the new cameras that point straight down into your car/cab catching people on phones/no seat belts, like this;


CHLEMCBC

1,049 posts

39 months

Tuesday 16th December 2025
quotequote all
whimsical ninja said:
Billy Eyelash said:
If the cameras' purpose is deterrence, then the lack of a visible flash makes them less effective.
I would have thought the big sign on the front of the pole was the deterrent. Anything else is just Darwinian
There are big signs all over Stsaffordshire and only about 14 functional cameras, so the deterrent is moot.

GolfDragon

263 posts

89 months

Wednesday 17th December 2025
quotequote all
It doesn’t bother me too much. Those cameras are bright yellow and are very visible.

It’s not like before when each gantry had them hiding behind the overhead signs and you’d hope Waze was right about an upcoming speed camera or just stick to the limit. When it’s a hidden camera then it annoys me more.

And if the cameras punish people who drive around scrolling through TikTok, Instagram, Facebook etc. I’m all for it from a road safety point of view

Julian Thompson

2,641 posts

260 months

Wednesday 17th December 2025
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
They are the new cameras that point straight down into your car/cab catching people on phones/no seat belts, like this;

I don’t think so - those ones were on gantries looking down. Those cameras in this pic would not get the angle

Plymo

1,230 posts

111 months

Saturday 20th December 2025
quotequote all
I've been past these in both directions now, my guess would be that it's 2 new types being tested.

The one on the gantry looks like a smaller version of the HADECS3 but without a flash.
Quite sneaky really as they are a lot less visible than the current ones. I'm assuming they'll have the same embarrassing issue as the current ones!

The one on its own pole is just before a variable limit sign, and is pointing towards it, I'm guessing it's a different type that can take the speed measurement "gotcha" photo and the speed limit sign "evidence" photo in one frame.

Frankly that one sounds like a better design if that is how it works, firstly as if the photo of the limit and the photo of the "speeding lunatic doing 28mph at 2am" could be in the same frame - potentially avoiding the issue they're having at the moment.
It's also really visible and in advance of the sign! Definitely seems much "fairer"

Simpo Two

90,859 posts

287 months

Saturday 20th December 2025
quotequote all
For country that's skint we seem to have unlimited money for this kind of thing.

tomj_

Original Poster:

37 posts

79 months

Saturday 20th December 2025
quotequote all
Plymo said:
I've been past these in both directions now, my guess would be that it's 2 new types being tested.
The one on its own pole is just before a variable limit sign, and is pointing towards it, I'm guessing it's a different type that can take the speed measurement "gotcha" photo and the speed limit sign "evidence" photo in one frame.
So long as it only gets you once you're past the sign and not beforehand...

havoc

32,509 posts

257 months

Sunday 21st December 2025
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
For country that's skint we seem to have unlimited money for this kind of thing.
What, you mean making everyone's lives that little bit more miserable because we're run by corrupt control-freaks?

Frane Selak

272 posts

7 months

Sunday 21st December 2025
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
For country that's skint we seem to have unlimited money for this kind of thing.
Its a self fulfilling prophecy for them, they just buy more cameras with the revenue. Control freaks love to spend money, usually other peoples, so whether its tax or speed camera fines or whatever it generates an income for them to then flush down the toilet on anything and everything (apart from the tax payer obviously).

Mont Blanc

2,379 posts

65 months

Sunday 21st December 2025
quotequote all
havoc said:
Simpo Two said:
For country that's skint we seem to have unlimited money for this kind of thing.
What, you mean making everyone's lives that little bit more miserable because we're run by corrupt control-freaks?
Unfortunately, I think we can blame drivers for the proliferation of speed cameras, and soon to be installed seatbelt/phone-use cameras.

Every time one of these things is installed, motorists throw themselves into the trap with gay abandon, in their tens of thousands, like lemmings, conclusively proving that we absolutely cannot be trusted to operate motor vehicles responsibly, and further cementing the case that even more of these cameras are needed.