Woman, 86, convicted after car insurance typo error
Woman, 86, convicted after car insurance typo error
Author
Discussion

Googie

Original Poster:

2,133 posts

150 months

computer says no-mind how you go

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g5xee663zo

sixor8

8,062 posts

292 months

Sounds cruel, but they have to do this. Or, word gets round that by putting one letter wrong 'by accident' would get you much cheaper insurance. Possibly unlucky that the make of car was the same (if it was?) so not spotted earlier. frown

ralphrj

3,978 posts

215 months

sixor8 said:
Sounds cruel, but they have to do this. Or, word gets round that by putting one letter wrong 'by accident' would get you much cheaper insurance. Possibly unlucky that the make of car was the same (if it was?) so not spotted earlier. frown
This

It is a technical offence and she was given a short, conditional discharge which meant that so long as the error was corrected the conviction was spent as soon as the conditional discharge expired.

_Rodders_

1,769 posts

43 months

In two minds on that one. Rather draconian way of dealing with it but I've got some serious questions about her fitness to drive if she's unable to check the main details on the document when they were posted out. She will have had atleast 3 chances to spot the mistake.

croyde

25,683 posts

254 months

Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!

MB140

4,851 posts

127 months

croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
I’ve got to say I agree. I find that utterly unpalatable, I realise the sentence is about as low as you can go but…….

When we can’t be arsed to prosecute much worst low life scumbags who are actually effecting honest citizens lives (assault, theft, domestic burglary etc etc then it seems wrong.

The law is about honesty, justice and protecting everyone. This just stinks.

Googie

Original Poster:

2,133 posts

150 months

croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
This.....!

Robertb

3,513 posts

262 months

_Rodders_ said:
In two minds on that one. Rather draconian way of dealing with it but I've got some serious questions about her fitness to drive if she's unable to check the main details on the document when they were posted out. She will have had atleast 3 chances to spot the mistake.
It would be an easy thing to miss, as you 'see' the number as recognisable so your brain short-cuts and corrects the error. Its why its essential to get someone else to proof-read your own writing.



Dog Biscuit

1,882 posts

21 months

Petty but maybe for the greater good...at 86 she's already a liability on the roads surely? smile

55palfers

6,291 posts

188 months

Magistrate had the power to refer back to DVLA.
He just couldn't be arsed.

AbbeyNormal

6,449 posts

182 months

croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
What's the answer then? Anyone get's off scot free as long as they claim to entered the details of their Ferrari as a 1.0 Fiesta? At what age do you think the cut off should be.

it's an offence, she broke the law. Unwittingly maybe, but a percentage of people that speed dont intend to break the law, they just have a lapse. Maybe that should be a valid defense as well.

if you dont want to risk breaking the law take a bus.

BlackTails

2,884 posts

79 months

55palfers said:
Magistrate had the power to refer back to DVLA.
He just couldn't be arsed.
Well,

“In the pensioner's case, David Pollard, a magistrate sitting at Teesside Magistrates' Court, opted to accept the written guilty plea and impose a conviction, rather than asking the DVLA to do further checks on the public interest in the prosecution.”

If he has a written guilty plea sitting on his desk in front of him, I reckon it would take quite a bit for him to become sufficiently arsed to reject that plea and send the DVLA off to do some homework.

55palfers

6,291 posts

188 months

BlackTails said:
55palfers said:
Magistrate had the power to refer back to DVLA.
He just couldn't be arsed.
Well,

In the pensioner's case, David Pollard, a magistrate sitting at Teesside Magistrates' Court, opted to accept the written guilty plea and impose a conviction, rather than asking the DVLA to do further checks on the public interest in the prosecution.

If he has a written guilty plea sitting on his desk in front of him, I reckon it would take quite a bit for him to become sufficiently arsed to reject that plea and send the DVLA off to do some homework.
Mitigating circumstances not being investigated is an acceptable justice procedure.?

Defendant should have opted for jury trial

Cliftonite

8,693 posts

162 months

Was her plight not worsened by a guilty plea?

One that Agtlaw could unravel for us in the blink of an eye?

shout


snuffy

12,556 posts

308 months

How come the insurance company did not cross reference the reg number to the type of car?


snuffy

12,556 posts

308 months

MB140 said:
croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
I ve got to say I agree. I find that utterly unpalatable, I realise the sentence is about as low as you can go but .

When we can t be arsed to prosecute much worst low life scumbags who are actually effecting honest citizens lives (assault, theft, domestic burglary etc etc then it seems wrong.

The law is about honesty, justice and protecting everyone. This just stinks.
The term "low hanging fruit" has never been more apt in this case.

People on here saying it's her own fault, I wonder if they'd be saying the same if it was their 86 year old mother?



Terminator X

19,753 posts

228 months

86 year olds in the dock, a fine use of limited resources clap I can't think of anything else that I'd rather they spent their time on.

TX.

Terminator X

19,753 posts

228 months

AbbeyNormal said:
croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
What's the answer then? Anyone get's off scot free as long as they claim to entered the details of their Ferrari as a 1.0 Fiesta? At what age do you think the cut off should be.

it's an offence, she broke the law. Unwittingly maybe, but a percentage of people that speed dont intend to break the law, they just have a lapse. Maybe that should be a valid defense as well.

if you dont want to risk breaking the law take a bus.
Lol she got a digit wrong on the paperwork so A123 XYZ instead of B123 XYZ.

TX.

768

19,307 posts

120 months

croyde said:
Fekin ridiculous. Shoplifters allowed to nick whatever they want. Fire anyone that tries to stop them.

Illegal E Motorbikes everywhere but why don't we get an easy bust and do an old lady that hit the wrong key on her keyboard.

What if the 'wrong' plate belonged to a Lambo and the insurance company pocketed the windfall.

What a waste of tax payers money!
I'm inclined to agree, assuming she paid a reasonable amount, I can't imagine her insurance is normally particularly expensive.

Word seems to have gone around that you can just shoplift and get away with it, but that's apparently something we just have to put up with even though it's a much more confronting and costly crime.

CMTMB

1,104 posts

19 months

AbbeyNormal said:
What's the answer then? Anyone get's off scot free as long as they claim to entered the details of their Ferrari as a 1.0 Fiesta?
Was the incorrect car insured? I thought the only thing incorrect was one letter of the number plate?