Discussion
No points mentioned in my notes Telecat yet - understand they are aware and looking at imposing.
Reg 5 (rear) Reg 6 (front) R.V (Display of Registration Marks) Regs 2001 imposes the requirement to have and Section 59 VERA 1994 imposes a fine of £1000 if breached. A FPN comes out cheaper as you state.
dvd
Reg 5 (rear) Reg 6 (front) R.V (Display of Registration Marks) Regs 2001 imposes the requirement to have and Section 59 VERA 1994 imposes a fine of £1000 if breached. A FPN comes out cheaper as you state.
dvd
lambo cop said:
Its only £30 non-endorsable ticket for plates not in accordance with regulations. Those regulations can be found at.....
www.dvla.gov.uk/vehicles/regmarks/reg_marks_current_requirements.htm#mandatorycharacterfont
what about the MOT thing - I.E not allowing a vehicle to continue and withdrawing the cars MOT until it has a new MOT with legal plate ??
>> Edited by hughesieII on Monday 13th March 12:27
lambo cop said:
Its only £30 non-endorsable ticket for plates not in accordance with regulations. Those regulations can be found at.....
www.dvla.gov.uk/vehicles/regmarks/reg_marks_current_requirements.htm#mandatorycharacterfont
dvla website said:
A fine of up to £1,000
The registration mark may be WITHDRAWN
The vehicle may FAIL the MOT test
Did I miss something?
.......and not fogetting if stopped and on interview a nefaraious reason for displaying i.e. to fool the authorities from doing something they would have done, come to light, then offence of fraudulent use of a Registration Mark contrary to Section 44 VERA 1994 disclosed?
A gentle fine of the max £5,000 and or/on indictment 2 years imp.
dvd
A gentle fine of the max £5,000 and or/on indictment 2 years imp.
dvd
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


