it had to happen
Author
Discussion

theconrodkid

Original Poster:

372 posts

290 months

Thursday 13th April 2006
quotequote all
got captured on the A 40 today from a scamera van on top of perivale underpass,i was doing the same as everyone else ie 60,limit is 50.
should i leave the country?

turbobloke

117,293 posts

290 months

Thursday 13th April 2006
quotequote all
Hold on that passport renewal - first off an indicated 60 may have been in reality mid-high 50's, add in the angle of dangle plus an ACPO margin, you could be OK...also your lane might not have been the one 'they' were interested in, and most of all it could have been a coffee break

14 days to plot an escape

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Thursday 13th April 2006
quotequote all
theconrodkid said:
got captured on the A 40 today from a scamera van on top of perivale underpass,i was doing the same as everyone else ie 60,limit is 50.
should i leave the country?


How do you know you got pinged?

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Thursday 13th April 2006
quotequote all
theconrodkid said:

should i leave the country?

Head straight for Victoria, Australia.

theconrodkid

Original Poster:

372 posts

290 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
i was in the middle lane, he was directley above the middle lane,can thay capture dozens of cars at the same time,we were all at the same speed.
i,m pretty proud that ive never been done before and dont want to spoil my claim of being the only person in the country without points

puggit

49,820 posts

278 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
theconrodkid said:
i was in the middle lane, he was directley above the middle lane,can thay capture dozens of cars at the same time,we were all at the same speed.
i,m pretty proud that ive never been done before and dont want to spoil my claim of being the only person in the country without points
I'm still clean

(despite being pinged on a single carriageway at 10mph over a 40 limit by a Talivan!).

theconrodkid

Original Poster:

372 posts

290 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
hope for me yet then,cheers chaps

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
theconrodkid said:
i was in the middle lane, he was directley above the middle lane,can thay capture dozens of cars at the same time,we were all at the same speed.

I don't think that's how the scamera vans work, is it? They focus on a car, check it's speed, then take a snap. They can't capture dozens at the same time.

deeps

5,432 posts

271 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
deva link said:
theconrodkid said:
i was in the middle lane, he was directley above the middle lane,can thay capture dozens of cars at the same time,we were all at the same speed.

I don't think that's how the scamera vans work, is it? They focus on a car, check it's speed, then take a snap. They can't capture dozens at the same time.

I don't know how long it takes to focus on a number plate and get a speed reading - couple of seconds per vehicle? Not sure but I thought this was all recorded on video tape, reveiwed later for NIP issuing.

sa_20v

4,114 posts

261 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
theconrodkid said:
hope for me yet then,cheers chaps


Yeah, I ran through one at 80mph in Norfolk, and seeing i'm on eleven points at present, I was rather pleased not to receive any junk mail from the Bib.

GreenV8S

31,024 posts

314 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
sa_20v said:
ran through one at 80mph ... on eleven points at present


I take it you don't much care whether you lose your license?

apache

39,731 posts

314 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
If you get the NIP, ask for photographic edivence

theconrodkid

Original Poster:

372 posts

290 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
pinkies crossed for an easy life

RedOctober

122 posts

246 months

Friday 14th April 2006
quotequote all
A scally mate of mine used to just ignore postal prosecutions and said that they mostly never chased them up anyway if ignored.

If they did get stroppy he'd just deny receiving anything through the post and say it got lost in the postal system as none of them were ever sent by recorded post etc, so no actual proof that NIP was actually received. He slammed their 'prosecution by proxy' postal methods.

As they say, proof of posting is not proof of delivery. He used to say that if they wanted to get him, then he'd wait until coppers turned up on his doorstep to arrest him, and then take it from there!

They never did, though, as it would have cost them too much just to chase up a £60 speeding fine.

I reckon you should be ok at that speed as most speedos tend to over-read a bit, especially if you've got worn tyres, as these have an overall smaller wheel diameter and rotate faster for a given road speed, increasing the over-reading error.

Another mate of mine got done in North Wales at 38 in a 30 zone. Had he been doing 37, he'd have got away with it under their guidelines at the time.

So I'm guessing that they won't bother with you unless you were actually doing more than 57 true mph (10% of limit + 2mph using plod's old guidleines).

I got done 2 years ago on an empty country road over the moors in North Wales-doing 71 in a 60 zone in the middle of nowhere with nothing but deserted moorland and the odd sheep behind highly visible fences.

Cunning b*******s we hiding in an unmarked plain van as I got home not even suspecting I'd been clocked. 2 days late this NIP drops through the post and I think 'what's this then', and had to look on a map to find out where they say I'd been caught.

Turns out it was on a long stretch of road where I recall overtaking a 50mph vehicle at 70mph briefly, in a 60mph zone, and then returning safely to 60mph again.

So I got done for overtaking quickly and safely and being on the 'wrong' side of the road for as little time as possible on a long straight stretch of road with perfect visibility, before returning to the legal speed anyway!

So my 10-year clean licence is now corrupted by 3 points, and for what, I ask you?

Pointless, the whole thing. If speeding kills, like that sanctimonious government ad keeps trying to say, then that should mean that every single person that ever got done for speeding should have killed someone, which means that there should have been 1.4 million deaths on the road last year, right?

Well there weren't, so speeding doesn't kill, period. Not paying attention to the road kills, but that's too hard to police and too expensive, so they settle for drivers exceeding the political speed limit with a faceless camera.

Come the revolution...