MET ANPR Statistics
Author
Discussion

plasticpig

Original Poster:

12,932 posts

255 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2179561,00.html

Blair, the Metropolitan police commissioner, has signed off a report by his force’s traffic unit which shows that black people account for 46% of all arrests generated by new automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) cameras.


I cant see the police can be blamed for 46% of the people been caught are black. I dont see the problem in just saying a higher proportion of black people commit car crime.

jasandjules

72,622 posts

259 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Uh, because it doesn't reflect the lefties beliefs?

7db

6,060 posts

260 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
I wonder what the breakdown of men vs women was, and if that's not 50%, why is there no outcry there. This will be an opportunity for some pretty unpleasant things to be said by any number of people but is ultimately a distraction.

turbobloke

117,301 posts

290 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
7db said:
I wonder what the breakdown of men vs women was, and if that's not 50%, why is there no outcry there. This will be an opportunity for some pretty unpleasant things to be said by any number of people but is ultimately a distraction.
The truth is sometimes unpleasant but working on the basis of politically correct fairy tales has got us into this mess. Call it as it is.

jasandjules

72,622 posts

259 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
That is called Postive Discrimination.

We can say 95% of men are crooks.. BUT, we couldn't say 95% of women are.... Lovely, isn't it.. Same as we can have MP candidate lists made up only of women. BUT if you did that with men only, and deliberately, it would be a problem.

Lentil eating, sandal wearing, guardian reading lefties........

turbobloke

117,301 posts

290 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
jasandjules said:
That is called Postive Discrimination.

We can say 95% of men are crooks.. BUT, we couldn't say 95% of women are.... Lovely, isn't it.. Same as we can have MP candidate lists made up only of women. BUT if you did that with men only, and deliberately, it would be a problem.

Lentil eating, sandal wearing, guardian reading lefties........
You forgot the beardie bit (sorry Prof)

Prof Beard

6,669 posts

257 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
jasandjules said:
That is called Postive Discrimination.

We can say 95% of men are crooks.. BUT, we couldn't say 95% of women are.... Lovely, isn't it.. Same as we can have MP candidate lists made up only of women. BUT if you did that with men only, and deliberately, it would be a problem.

Lentil eating, sandal wearing, guardian reading lefties........
You forgot the beardie bit (sorry Prof)


Not at all, I do read the Guardian and have been known to wear sandals. But I ing HATE lentils. PLUS this PC is a pinko-liberal thing. I have no problem with stating the truth about statistics

Hollywood Wheels

3,689 posts

260 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all

I'm staying RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT out of this one!!!!!!!!......

HW

turbobloke

117,301 posts

290 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Hollywood Wheels said:

I'm staying RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT out of this one!!!!!!!!......

HW
Bit windy eh HW?

Chief Constable Confucius he say, wheels can leave skidmarks in many places

plasticpig

Original Poster:

12,932 posts

255 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Hollywood Wheels said:

I'm staying RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT out of this one!!!!!!!!......

HW


I cant say I blame you. I posted the Times article because it seems to me that the Met seem desperatley afraid of being non PC even when the system appears so automated that it couldnt be BIB targeting ethnic minorities.



kenp

654 posts

278 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
Since the ANPR system is wholly impartial (colour-blind), why keep records of the ethnicity of those arrested? How many were homosexual, how many left-handed, how many ginger?

prof beard

6,669 posts

257 months

Monday 15th May 2006
quotequote all
kenp said:
Since the ANPR system is wholly impartial (colour-blind), why keep records of the ethnicity of those arrested? How many were homosexual, how many left-handed, how many ginger?


That is a fair question...

pesty

42,655 posts

286 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
prof beard said:
kenp said:
Since the ANPR system is wholly impartial (colour-blind), why keep records of the ethnicity of those arrested? How many were homosexual, how many left-handed, how many ginger?


That is a fair question...


I belive they have to keep records of people questioned/arrested to comply with Race laws. i.e to make sure they do not arrest too many people of colour. Think this was mainly introduced after the lawrence report.

Serving police officers may be able to correct me.

Prof Beard

6,669 posts

257 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
pesty said:
prof beard said:
kenp said:
Since the ANPR system is wholly impartial (colour-blind), why keep records of the ethnicity of those arrested? How many were homosexual, how many left-handed, how many ginger?


That is a fair question...


I belive they have to keep records of people questioned/arrested to comply with Race laws. i.e to make sure they do not arrest too many people of colour. Think this was mainly introduced after the lawrence report.

Serving police officers may be able to correct me.


So how, if the APNR system is automatic rather than selective, can keeping statistics make sure there is no racial imbalance in those found at fault?

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

274 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
Wasn't a Met report supressed (CCStevens)some years ago when it was found that a certain type was responsible for the majority of phone thefts.

Black days indeed.

dvd

BigBob

1,471 posts

255 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
plasticpig said:


I cant see the police can be blamed for 46% of the people been caught are black. I dont see the problem in just saying a higher proportion of black people commit car crime.



There is another way of looking at it - if 46% were black then 54% weren't




BB

GKP

15,099 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
What's the black to white (skin colour) ratio in that area?

autismuk

1,529 posts

270 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
plasticpig said:
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2179561,00.html

Blair, the Metropolitan police commissioner, has signed off a report by his force’s traffic unit which shows that black people account for 46% of all arrests generated by new automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) cameras.


I cant see the police can be blamed for 46% of the people been caught are black. I dont see the problem in just saying a higher proportion of black people commit car crime.



Well, so what ?

Would I be correct in assuming that the plate is linked to some database (say of stolen cars) and this is used to generate arrests ?

If so, it is independent and colourblind.

About the only ways you could rig it are (i) only put ANPR in areas with a very high black population or (ii) rig the program so it checks ethnicity. Neither are plausible.

james_j

3,996 posts

285 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
BigBob said:
plasticpig said:


I cant see the police can be blamed for 46% of the people been caught are black. I dont see the problem in just saying a higher proportion of black people commit car crime.



There is another way of looking at it - if 46% were black then 54% weren't




BB



...but blacks make up a very small percentage of the population, so the statistics can be useful as a guide (similar to figues used by insurance companies to judge likelyhood of an accident).

BigBob

1,471 posts

255 months

Tuesday 16th May 2006
quotequote all
james_j said:
BigBob said:
plasticpig said:


I cant see the police can be blamed for 46% of the people been caught are black. I dont see the problem in just saying a higher proportion of black people commit car crime.



There is another way of looking at it - if 46% were black then 54% weren't




BB



...but blacks make up a very small percentage of the population, so the statistics can be useful as a guide (similar to figues used by insurance companies to judge likelyhood of an accident).




The point I was trying, not very well admittedly, to put across was that while the figures may be accurate the way they are interpretted or phrased can put a totally different complexion (no pun intended) on things.





BB