CAMERA VANS IN PUBLIC LAYBYS
CAMERA VANS IN PUBLIC LAYBYS
Author
Discussion

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
I often see Camera Vans parked in public laybys with the operator looking out of the rear of the vehicle. What if another vehicle was to park in the layby directly behind the Camera Van thus blocking the operators view of the road.
As it's a public layby, would any offence be committed by parking in such a way?

jaykaybi

3,494 posts

247 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
There's one way to find out!




But seriously, I imagine (purely based on the big picture) they'll do you for obstructing.
Maybe someone who knows more could advise on my unfounded sugestions...



Edited to add - I figure it would be the same as deliberately trying to stand in front of a policeman during a foot chase (regardless of the public nature of the pavement). It's not, but they'd take it in the same light I reckon...


Best of luck!


>> Edited by jaykaybi on Wednesday 24th May 15:51

puggit

49,574 posts

274 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
There was a case near Reading - white van man parked in a marked bay outside a newsagent while shopping inside.

He was told to move by the little hitler inside and ignored him. Scameraship took wvm to court and lost - it appears that the newsagent owned the spaces and gave wvm permission to park there

Different to a public layby of course...

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
Yeah, I thought that they would ask you to move on & if you refused they'd threaten you with obstruction or similar. As it's a public layby though and if you needed to check your vehicle or make a phone call etc. why shouldn't you park there?
I should add, that I'm just curious as to the legal situation, I wouldn't suggest that anyone park their vehicle so as to obstruct a Camera Van in going about their duty & "saving lifes".

>> Edited by A57 HSV on Wednesday 24th May 15:58

7db

6,060 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
Obstruction would be the likely charge, but breaking down into the layby, as the only safe refuge, and then fixing your vehicle -- bonnet up -- might do.

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
Do the Camera Partnerships have the same rights as the Police? It's not as if they are carrying out an observation on a specific suspected criminal/s. IMO it's not comparable to obstructing the Police at all.

7db

6,060 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
they are acting for and on the authority of the CC, so probably enjoy the same protection.

puggit

49,574 posts

274 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
A57 HSV said:
Do the Camera Partnerships have the same rights as the Police? It's not as if they are carrying out an observation on a specific suspected criminal/s. IMO it's not comparable to obstructing the Police at all.
Depends if it's a civvie or a BiB inside the van.

What if it's a BiB on overtime getting paid by the scameraship?

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
Interesting to see if the resident BiB have a view.

bigdods

7,175 posts

253 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
Interesting point. We see signs all over telling us to take a break and tiredness kills. SO what would be the position if I pulled into a layby behind said van for a quick snooze and was told to move along. Surely if I am being sensible and taking a break as I am tired being forced to drive on is seriously dangerous ?

Hmmmmm

softtop

3,169 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
bigdods said:
We signs all over telling us to take a break and tiredness kills. SO what would be the position if I pulled into a layby behind said van for a quick snooze and was told to move along?

Hmmmmm


If you were asleep before they knocked on the window.......

FortJefferson

8,237 posts

248 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
A few miles from me there has been some building work going on for the last three weeks, that is right next to a speed camera. The builder has his box van backed up to the camera most days. They have a lot of pictures of the back of this van because I allways do 40 past it when it's there.

gilberninvader

262 posts

243 months

Wednesday 24th May 2006
quotequote all
see another post on here,INSANE OR THE START OF SOMETHING BIG?
Lots are already looking into this very question, this might take off me thinks!

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
Any PH BiB care to comment, I'd like to know if it would actually be an offence. I can't see why it would be, as the laybys haven't been closed off & there are never any cones or no parking signs in place. As such, I assume we have as much right as they do to park there.

cooperman

4,428 posts

276 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
A good friend was towing a car on a trailer and stopped in a lay-by on the Shefford by-pass where a civvie in a scammer van was working. Due to the length of the lay-by and his vehicle combination he had to stop in front of the van and the scammer in the van demanded he move immediately. He refused on the basis that he needed to check the load restraints and needed to make a phone call and have a cup of tea from his thermos flask, pointing out that the reason for the lay-by was exactly that. The scammer gave up, started up his van and moved elsewhere.

james_j

3,996 posts

281 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
cooperman said:
A good friend was towing a car on a trailer and stopped in a lay-by on the Shefford by-pass where a civvie in a scammer van was working. Due to the length of the lay-by and his vehicle combination he had to stop in front of the van and the scammer in the van demanded he move immediately. He refused on the basis that he needed to check the load restraints and needed to make a phone call and have a cup of tea from his thermos flask, pointing out that the reason for the lay-by was exactly that. The scammer gave up, started up his van and moved elsewhere.


Excellent. I feel sure camera van operators in lay-bys probably don't have a leg to stand on if you park in their way. A lay-by is a public place where the public are entitled to park - wherever they wish.

If anything, I wonder about the legality of their carrying out their profession in a public lay-by.

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/defin
I don't know if the Highway Code has anything on Lay-Bys. I'd guess that they come under the by-laws for whichever County Council they belong to.
Being told to move on, when you need to rest or attend to your vehicle etc. can't be good for road safety & reducing the amount of accidents!

7db

6,060 posts

256 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
james_j said:
A lay-by is a public place where the public are entitled to park - wherever they wish.

Not if they are obstructing the Police.

james_j said:
If anything, I wonder about the legality of their carrying out their profession in a public lay-by.
A few of the girls around here don't seem put off by doing exactly just that.

A57 HSV

Original Poster:

1,510 posts

256 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
Section 223 of the Highway Code. Therefore, any Camera Vans operating at night should have their parking lights on, if the speed limit is greater than 30mph. Interesting! I haven't seen any Camera Vans operating at night, but I've heard that they can.
www.highwaycode.gov.uk/22.htm#223

>> Edited by A57 HSV on Thursday 25th May 13:22

splatspeed

7,491 posts

277 months

Thursday 25th May 2006
quotequote all
all comes down to intent

if they can prove you parked there to obstruct them then they have you

its that simple