Camera partnership response!
Camera partnership response!
Author
Discussion

deltaf

Original Poster:

1,384 posts

277 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Finally had this little gem back today, once again re-affirms just what we all know and realise, that theyre in it for the cash, no answers were forthcoming from them.
Enjoy, and do feel free to contact them yourselves!


From: SafeCam@somerset.gov.uk
To: "'deltaf"
Subject: Safety Camera Partnership Feedback
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:51:41 -0000




Thank you for your comments dated 27th February 2003.
if you dispute the content of our web site there seems little point in
offering you further correspondence for you to dispute.
Our operation is based on casualty reduction.

THINK! Road Safety


This communication is intended solely for the person (s) or
organisation to
whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient (s), you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender and copy the message to
ICTDHelp@somerset.gov.uk




>>> Edited by deltaf on Monday 10th March 12:38

>>> Edited by deltaf on Monday 10th March 12:38

victormeldrew

8,293 posts

297 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
I take it you don't place much store in the legalese at the bottom of the message then?

dazren

22,612 posts

281 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Deltaf

Can you email me a copy of what you sent to them. This Safescam lot are local to me.

DAZ

deltaf

Original Poster:

1,384 posts

277 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Ahh Victor, but if you read it, it Was adressed to me, i can therefore do as i please with it!

I dont have a copy of the one i sent to them Daz unfortunately, however, ive just sent them this in response.....

Dear sir,
Am I to assume the lack of a coherent response is due to your inability to answer any of the points i raised?
If you cannot even bring yourselves to answer valid questions/comments/critisisms of the website, then what possible chance do you have of convincing people of your " safety" message?
Or is it more likely that you are not really interested in "safety" at all, and the collection of large amounts of revenue is the real motivation?
That would seem to be the most likely explanation for unwillingness to co-operate and give answers to genuine questions, or is that you feel you are a law unto yourselves?
I shall forward your response to my MP, as your level of customer support is somewhat lacking, maybe that will motivate you.

Lolol im just a pest!

tvrslag

1,198 posts

275 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Deltaf
You appear to have FAR to much time on your hands.
But at least somebody is making a pest out of themselves. LOL

soulpatch

4,693 posts

278 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all

tvrslag said: Deltaf
You appear to have FAR to much time on your hands.
But at least somebody is making a pest out of themselves. LOL



time well spent really!