Safe Speed scores media victory
Much coverage in mainstream outlets
Truvelo speed camera
An article in the Observer's colour magazine looked into the question of speed cameras, and the last half was a largely favourable description of Safe Speed's forensic approach to road safety statistics.
Smith was quoted lambasting the Government which, in 1992, brought in the first speed camera. They seemed almost like magic at the time: "If you're not looking into it in too much detail, the promise of a magic accident-reducing machine is very persuasive, but it ignores all the other psychological factors that ensure we avoid carnage on the roads", said Smith.
The feature then went on to describe Smith's discovery that the real fatality rate on the roads is not diminishing but getting worse, as a result of an increasing reliance on speed cameras for roads policing.
The article points out: "Taken as a whole, we are left with one broad problem: there is still no fundamental agreement on how speed relates to danger."
Safe Speed has figured heavily in PistonHeads' coverage of speeding issues, and we agree with Smith that the government has got the balance wrong. Here's hoping that this is the start of a national debate, rather than slogan-slinging.
Lack of police patrols can be seen anytime -- bad, driving examples abound, but do cameras note any of this? At present not.
What's coming is full-time video, with intelligent software that notes deviant behaviour, flagging up people like the t**t in his hot little Honda driving so aggressively among the shopping cars in Aylesbury yesterday.
The sad thing is that as usual, the behaviour of the few wrecks life for the rest of us.
Ho hum.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff