A tyre question
Author
Discussion

smeggy

Original Poster:

3,241 posts

269 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
A colleague of mine has said that tyre manufacturers are now recommending that if you need to buy only 2 tyres, you should place them on the rear wheels, not the front. If you need new rears then you should move the used (still good) rears to the front and put the new ones on the rear.

Apparently the theory goes that you are more likely to regain control if you have a front tyre blow-out than a rear one, so you need the better tyre on the rear.

This doesn’t sit right with us; is there any truth in this?

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
smeggy said:
A colleague of mine has said that tyre manufacturers are now recommending that if you need to buy only 2 tyres, you should place them on the rear wheels, not the front. If you need new rears then you should move the used (still good) rears to the front and put the new ones on the rear.

Apparently the theory goes that you are more likely to regain control if you have a front tyre blow-out than a rear one, so you need the better tyre on the rear.

This doesn’t sit right with us; is there any truth in this?



I would suspect you are better with new tyres on the rear to avoid "loosing" the rear end under braking etc.... would you be more likely to generate oversteer with the better tyre on the front?..........although someone will probably come along and prove me wrong now..


Edited by esselte on Monday 19th February 13:41

jwo

989 posts

279 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
I was under the impression this was done to induce understeer rather than oversteer when you over cook it! Nothing to do with blowouts! I have always kept new rubber on the back and swapped as necessary.

havoc

33,484 posts

265 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
I always do the opposite, certainly on the fwd machinery, as:-
- front wheels do most gripping
- front wheels do most braking
- front wheels need traction more than rears
- front wheels hit standing water first

...and, IMHO, it's easier to recover from unintentional oversteer than understeer in a fwd car - understeer recovery requires you to lift off the throttle, which if it's 'unintentional' would suggest low throttle openings anyway. Oversteer recovery requires merely a steering input, and if really bad a sharp application of brakes (let ABS sort it out).

Happy to debate this, if anyone is of another mind.

Oh...and would this be better in Advanced Driving?

neil360

1,647 posts

237 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Yes the tyre fitter (Pirelli Performace Centre) the other day told me the same new tyres on the rear of our Golf and said that was the current rules it was news to me!

So what do I do when I need new fronts on my 360 they don't fit the back!!

jwo

989 posts

279 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
but lets not forget, for joe public understeer is easier to recover than oversteer? (or is it having seen joe public trying to drive - they will crash whatever!!)

loading up the front going in to a corner (too hot), with less grip on the rear potential for oversteer - more grip this can be avoided (or it will let go later resulting in sharper oversteer less controllable). Certainly in wet conditions it is better to haev more grip at back than front.

As for fezza 360's - just buy a new set of rear boots too!

negative creep

26,116 posts

257 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
aren't most cars set up for understter now anyway? Never been quite sure why, I've always found oversteer much easier to correct (not to mention more fun)

eccles

14,401 posts

252 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
i posted asking the same question a couple of months ago. my local tyre place wanted to fit them to the rear, and i had to argue with them to get them put on the front. his argument was that when new, they don't have as much grip, but every time i've had new tyres on the front, i've always noticed the improvement in grip over the old, bald ones!

scorcher

4,129 posts

264 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
I think this theory was tested on Fifth Gear or the likes a few years back and I think it came to the conclusion that new tyres should be fitted to the rear axle because understeer is generally easier to control than oversteer.

bigdods

7,175 posts

257 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
This was tested on fifth gear. for Front drive cars fit the new tyres on the rear, for rear drive stick them on the front. You can to varying degrees control over/understeer with the throttle, so you need to have your best, stickiest tyre on the undriven wheels.

I recall they took a fiesta and drove it in circles, with the old tyres on the back it fell off the road at very low speed. Swap front and rear and it attained a much higher speed and stayed on the line.

Rob_the_Sparky

1,000 posts

268 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
havoc said:

Oversteer recovery requires merely a steering input, and if really bad a sharp application of brakes (let ABS sort it out).


I would not recommend trying that in an FWD car. Applying the brakes moves more weight foward giving the car even less grip at the rear. Correct thing to do is to apply throttle, this helps pull the car straight and shifts weight rearwards helping the rear grip.

Rob

bluepolarbear

1,666 posts

276 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
As stated, the newer tyres go on the back to provide better stability in extreme circumstances by attempting to ensure the front loses grip first causing understeer rather than the back causing over steer.

The natural reaction of most muppets is better suited to understeer than oversteer.

Brand new tyres can be "slippery" when new due to the production process so you generally take it easy for the first 50miles - same as new pads / discs etc.

Edited by bluepolarbear on Monday 19th February 20:25

havoc

33,484 posts

265 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Rob_the_Sparky said:
havoc said:

Oversteer recovery requires merely a steering input, and if really bad a sharp application of brakes (let ABS sort it out).


I would not recommend trying that in an FWD car. Applying the brakes moves more weight foward giving the car even less grip at the rear. Correct thing to do is to apply throttle, this helps pull the car straight and shifts weight rearwards helping the rear grip.

Rob


I have tried it...with success.

But agree that for the masses understeer is safer.

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

264 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Better to have the grip on the rear.

A blowout at the back when cornering = fishtailing car, total loss of control

A blowout at the front when cornering = understeering car, brake to a halt.

So yes, they're correct to replace the rears in preference to the fronts.

combemarshal

2,030 posts

256 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
Better to have the grip on the rear.

A blowout at the back when cornering = fishtailing car, total loss of control

A blowout at the front when cornering = understeering car, brake to a halt.

So yes, they're correct to replace the rears in preference to the fronts.


But a blow at 70+ on the motorway is far worse on a front tyre than rear.
New tyres always go on the front I mine, I find, it might sound odd, that the tyres wear off squarer on the back making a better contact patch and thus are better left there (makes sense in my head!)

Nick_F

10,598 posts

276 months

Monday 19th February 2007
quotequote all
Simpler solution is to swap front to back to keep the wear even and then replace all four at once.

If you can't, and it's a pain on anything with tyre pressure sensors, then depth of tread doesn't make much difference to anything except resistance to aquaplaning, which suggests new tyres should go on the front where this will do the more good.

Personally I think 'lifing' tyres as part of the MOT would be no bad thing either, but it would get pricey for some.

Fat Richie

1,271 posts

248 months

Tuesday 20th February 2007
quotequote all
Doesn't it all depend on whether your car is rear-wheel-drive or wrong-wheel-drive?

bumpkin

158 posts

285 months

Tuesday 20th February 2007
quotequote all
last few time we have swapped the rear tyres to the front they have caused appalling vibration. these were manily toyo t1's but also a pair of contisports.

not something i will be doing again

havoc

33,484 posts

265 months

Tuesday 20th February 2007
quotequote all
bumpkin said:
last few time we have swapped the rear tyres to the front they have caused appalling vibration. these were manily toyo t1's but also a pair of contisports.

not something i will be doing again


Sounds like your tracking may be out...suggests uneven wear on the rears...

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

264 months

Tuesday 20th February 2007
quotequote all
combemarshal said:
But a blow at 70+ on the motorway is far worse on a front tyre than rear.


How so? One leads to understeer. The other, to oversteer.

Which would you rather have at 70mph or above?