Speed camera research was axed
Discussion
I just saw this on MSN news: http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?c
The Government cancelled research into the effect speed cameras were having on accident rates and driver behaviour, a request under the Freedom of Information Act has revealed.
The cancellation by the Department for Transport (DfT) was described as "astonishing and grossly irresponsible" by anti-speed camera group Safe Speed.
The DfT said in its reply under the Act that its original research was replaced by research looking at the wider effects of cameras.
But Safe Speed, which believes cameras are having no effect on casualty rates, said the original research was dropped because the DfT was "scared about the likely results".
It was a Safe Speed member who organised the anti-road charging petition which attracted 1.8 million signatures on a Downing Street website recently.
Safe Speed has published its own report on the "side effects" of speed cameras, pointing out that neither road deaths nor the number of people taken to hospital after crashes had fallen as expected since the introduction of speed cameras.
Safe Speed said the best estimate of the life-saving benefit of speed cameras stood at 25 lives a year and that if more lives than this are lost then the cameras were "increasing the death toll on British roads".
Safe Speed founder Paul Smith said: "Our analysis is clear and confident and takes proper account of all known science, statistics and systematic analysis. Our confident conclusion is that speed cameras are making road safety much worse and must be scrapped immediately."
He went on: "It is astonishing and grossly irresponsible that the DfT has cancelled their important 'side effects' research. I can only imagine that they were scared about the likely results and would rather save face than save lives.
"I would love to see a DfT point-by-point response to our new report but of course they cannot properly respond because they have cancelled their research."
The Government cancelled research into the effect speed cameras were having on accident rates and driver behaviour, a request under the Freedom of Information Act has revealed.
The cancellation by the Department for Transport (DfT) was described as "astonishing and grossly irresponsible" by anti-speed camera group Safe Speed.
The DfT said in its reply under the Act that its original research was replaced by research looking at the wider effects of cameras.
But Safe Speed, which believes cameras are having no effect on casualty rates, said the original research was dropped because the DfT was "scared about the likely results".
It was a Safe Speed member who organised the anti-road charging petition which attracted 1.8 million signatures on a Downing Street website recently.
Safe Speed has published its own report on the "side effects" of speed cameras, pointing out that neither road deaths nor the number of people taken to hospital after crashes had fallen as expected since the introduction of speed cameras.
Safe Speed said the best estimate of the life-saving benefit of speed cameras stood at 25 lives a year and that if more lives than this are lost then the cameras were "increasing the death toll on British roads".
Safe Speed founder Paul Smith said: "Our analysis is clear and confident and takes proper account of all known science, statistics and systematic analysis. Our confident conclusion is that speed cameras are making road safety much worse and must be scrapped immediately."
He went on: "It is astonishing and grossly irresponsible that the DfT has cancelled their important 'side effects' research. I can only imagine that they were scared about the likely results and would rather save face than save lives.
"I would love to see a DfT point-by-point response to our new report but of course they cannot properly respond because they have cancelled their research."
I think this needs to be made more mainstream. Worth getting the BBC to look into this. There is no good reason why research would be cancelled, unless as SafeSpeed suggests, that the results were not coming up well for the "safety" tax collection machines.
Saying that, a simple search on all DfT lists/stats in respect of accidents also gives a fair old clue.
Saying that, a simple search on all DfT lists/stats in respect of accidents also gives a fair old clue.
jasandjules said:
I think this needs to be made more mainstream. Worth getting the BBC to look into this. There is no good reason why research would be cancelled, unless as SafeSpeed suggests, that the results were not coming up well for the "safety" tax collection machines.
Saying that, a simple search on all DfT lists/stats in respect of accidents also gives a fair old clue.
Saying that, a simple search on all DfT lists/stats in respect of accidents also gives a fair old clue.
Just been reported on CH5 'the wright stuff' , they said it is in todays Daily mail, but I cant find it on the DM web site.
A quick search elsewhere reviles
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0
www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-6478250,00.html
Folks,
See the front page of the Safe Speed website today for more on this story, and to find out why it's time to get angry.
www.safespeed.org.uk
See the front page of the Safe Speed website today for more on this story, and to find out why it's time to get angry.
www.safespeed.org.uk
martind said:
Just been reported on CH5 'the wright stuff' , they said it is in todays Daily mail, but I cant find it on the DM web site.
Found it now
www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=442170&in_page_id=1770
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff