Derbyshire GATSO camera modules moved from site to site...
Derbyshire GATSO camera modules moved from site to site...
Author
Discussion

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Saturday 14th July 2007
quotequote all
First the negative PR for Derbyshire:

Derbyshire Safety Camera partnership have confirmed that Derbyshire Constabulary do NOT prosecute for 30mph+10%+2mph, OR 40mph+10%+2mph, but DO prosecute for 50mph+10%+2mph!

Given that GATSO cameras are only certified by the Home Office to be accurate to within +/-2mph at speeds under 60mph, that means that Derbyshire are prosecuting me for 55mph on an empty 50mph dual carriageway, early on a Sunday evening.

Now the nitty gritty of the moving modules in Derbyshire:

Has anyone else come across the circumstances where GATSO camera and radar modules (but particularly camera modules) are being moved from camera site to camera site, in between calibration certificates. In essence, the calibration is carried out away from the camera cabinet / site, the location in which the camera module is used then changing, from site to site, before it is recalibrated.

1. It would appear that no calibration / certification of resistance / voltage regulation is being carried out at the cabinets when the module is inserted in the cabinet, or is there calibration in this area already?

2. Has anyone ever had evidence to substantiate that voltage regulation and cabinet circuit resistance has been checked during this process?

3. Does anyone know if the modules have independent voltage regulation, given that 'street power supplies' are notoriously 'dirty'?

3. Does the Home Office certification / Gatsometer calibration certificate for GATSO cameras cover them for this type of use on multiple sites?

4. Has anyone come across a suitable 'expert' winess in this area?

PLEASE stay on topic in your response...

aw51 121565

4,773 posts

264 months

Saturday 14th July 2007
quotequote all
Not all GATSO camera 'boxes' are 'live' ie. have camera units in them. Some sources say there is a 1 in 4 chance of a speed camera being 'live'.

The camera units have been moved around from camera site to camera site for a loooong time... that's not a new thing.

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Saturday 14th July 2007
quotequote all
Please stay on topic - the last response doesn't seem to address any of the four questions above.

Anyone seen the certification from the Home Office for camera modules when moved from site to site?

Anyone have evidence of voltage regulation / resistance checks during the relocation process?

Edited by ramtec on Saturday 14th July 19:13

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Sunday 15th July 2007
quotequote all
So, for all the volume of 'chat' on here (particularly from the pro-authoritarian anoraks), apparently no one has yet challenged on the basis of GATSO site voltage regulation and resistance...

Wow!

vonhosen

40,597 posts

248 months

Sunday 15th July 2007
quotequote all
ramtec said:
So, for all the volume of 'chat' on here (particularly from the pro-authoritarian anoraks), apparently no one has yet challenged on the basis of GATSO site voltage regulation and resistance...

Wow!
Perhaps people just prefer not to answer your questions because of the manner in which you ask them. smile

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

279 months

Sunday 15th July 2007
quotequote all
Why don't you do it then, instead of coming on here with your authoritarian 'stay on topic' attitude. It stood out a mile on your OP, and the only response you get, you chew him off. Then you post a sarcastic comment.

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Sunday 15th July 2007
quotequote all
No, sorry, don't see anything in the original post that could possibly offend anyone... unless of course they had something to lose on the subject of voltage regulation / resistance calibration...

"Stay on topic" is all about making the board useful. Fluffy clouds won't be indulged in court, so let's stick to the point. If you can't have a focussed, adult discussion, suggest you try MSN...

The surprised comment, that no one has challenged on this area yet, is quite genuine.

Edited by ramtec on Sunday 15th July 19:31


Edited by ramtec on Sunday 15th July 19:33

bryan35

1,906 posts

272 months

Sunday 15th July 2007
quotequote all
gatso equipment uses SMPSU's - switch mode power suply units.

SMPSU's couldn't give a flying s***e what the input voltage is like, as long as it's somewhere between 55v and 400v, with a brown out tollerence interval of (I think) at least 2 seconds. Loop resistance is also irrelevent, as long as it can supply the required VA, which is only about 200. Basically the loop resistance would have to be greater than about 40-50 ohms to affect the operation of the camera.

the output will be an absolutely rock solid 5v, 12v and -12v. Similar to a computer power supply.

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Great stuff Bryan, thank you!

You ever checked your 'rock solid' computer power output lately? Not, perhaps that rock solid, after all...

Edited by ramtec on Tuesday 17th July 11:27

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
ramtec said:
Great stuff Bryan, thank you!

You ever checked your 'rock solid' computer power output lately? Not, perhaps that rock solid, after all...
Proving that mains voltage (for which the cameras are type approved) fluctuates is probably the easy bit.

IMO, proving that these fluctuations adversely affect the accuracy or reliability of the camera is something entirely different.

Edited by SS2. on Tuesday 17th July 12:49

bryan35

1,906 posts

272 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
the 5v rail has to be solid or the 'puter wouldn't work.

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
So, why do camera modules need recalibrating? Why does the interval between photos 1 & 2 change to the point of becoming the key focus (sic) during calibration?

Flintstone

8,644 posts

278 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
ramtec said:
So, why do camera modules need recalibrating? Why does the interval between photos 1 & 2 change to the point of becoming the key focus (sic) during calibration?
Who are you quoting there?

Goochie

5,802 posts

250 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
ramtec said:
So, why do camera modules need recalibrating? Why does the interval between photos 1 & 2 change to the point of becoming the key focus (sic) during calibration?
Please stay on topic - the original post did not include this question wink

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
ramtec said:
So, why do camera modules need recalibrating?
The official line is 'Speedmeters (cameras) are calibrated annually and a certificate produced which provides reassurance to the courts that the device is still measuring accurately using instruments calibrated to national standards.'

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
ramtec said:
So, why do camera modules need recalibrating? Why does the interval between photos 1 & 2 change to the point of becoming the key focus (sic) during calibration?
Who are you quoting there?
Gatsometer BV in the Netherlands.

ramtec

Original Poster:

214 posts

232 months

Saturday 21st July 2007
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
gatso equipment uses SMPSU's - switch mode power suply units.

SMPSU's couldn't give a flying s***e what the input voltage is like, as long as it's somewhere between 55v and 400v, with a brown out tollerence interval of (I think) at least 2 seconds. Loop resistance is also irrelevent, as long as it can supply the required VA, which is only about 200. Basically the loop resistance would have to be greater than about 40-50 ohms to affect the operation of the camera.

the output will be an absolutely rock solid 5v, 12v and -12v. Similar to a computer power supply.
Bryan! You're a genious! To think, I nearly let that get away! No one CHECKS the specification is within the limits you espouse!!!! Derbyshire Constabulary, under interview earlier this week admitted that there's NO maintenance schedule for the cabinet, not even basic Health & Safety stuff, never mind voltage regulation and reisistance checks. Not since its installation in 1997. Nor does there appear to be any type approval for calibration in the Netherlands, and then continual movement from site to site, in between calibration. So, no need to question the accuracy of the camera module per se, but every reason to request disclosure of the maintenance and calibration schedule for voltage and resistance at the cabinet...

I did declare my commercial interest on another thread, but just in case - McLean Productions is researching a production around 'Expert Evidence'.

Edited by ramtec on Saturday 21st July 16:37


Edited by ramtec on Saturday 21st July 16:37