RE: Garage Door Opener Lands Man With £5K Fine

RE: Garage Door Opener Lands Man With £5K Fine

Friday 31st August 2007

Garage Door Opener Lands Man With £5K Fine

Maybe it's better to open the door yourself?


It all started when Mr Eady was targeted by a traffic cop using a radar gun as he went through a 40mph limit. The radar gun failed to register the car and returned an error message to the gun. Mr Eady continued unaware.

Rather than put it down to error, the police decided to trace the Range Rover and inspect the car, the officers found the automatic garage door transponder fitted to the front of the vehicle and it appeared to deflect a hand-held police radar gun.

Mr Eady strongly denies knowing the unit was fitted. His garage door isn’t electric and he even asked his mechanic to stand up in court and state that he was never asked to fit it.

Judge Jacqueline Davies was having none of it and told him, ‘I am satisfied that you took deliberate action in acquiring this equipment with a view to avoiding further points’, before handing down the fine along with a one-year ban.

Mr Eady said after the four-day hearing: ‘This whole thing has been a witch-hunt. It’s as though it was a murder trial just for having a little thing on the car. I don’t mind paying my dues, although I still don’t admit I knew the thing was on there.’

Before you all go onto e-bay to find a zapper, be warned. South Yorks chief constable Meredydd Hughes said: ‘Police officers throughout the country have been briefed on how to detect the devices in action and the appropriate steps to be taken to ensure the successful prosecution of dangerous law-breakers who use them.’

Author
Discussion

TIGA84

Original Poster:

5,396 posts

245 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
make sure you buy an electric garage door as well?

TTwiggy

11,793 posts

218 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
'dangerous law breakers' - and they wonder why we're all a pit peeved?...

jon-

16,533 posts

230 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
'dangerous law breakers' - and they wonder why we're all a pit peeved?...
I guess his high horsed point of view is if you'll go out of your way to fit a blocker you intend on speeding there for intend on mowing down children in your nearest 30 area.

I'm not sure about the rest of you guys but I don't believe for a second he didn't know it was there. 12 month ban was a bit steep.

woof

8,456 posts

291 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all

i bet there's no such case - just spin

MitchT

16,696 posts

223 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
He should have mowed-down some children instead. That way he'd have got off with a £50 fine and a slapped wrist rolleyes

ridds

8,328 posts

258 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
One year ban??? That's a bit much isn't it?

Kush

28 posts

224 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
why would he have a door opener if he had no electric door?

If you are going to commit a crime atleast do it properly!!

Beef-Mc

2 posts

215 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
The law is never consistent when handing out penalities!


allaway

353 posts

236 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
As far as i know these door openers are supposed to jam laser guns but the article only mentioned radar guns? Anyone know any different?

xyyman

1,086 posts

239 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
Whether you believe Mr Eady or not its as well to check if the vehicle you purchase has any sort of device fitted that clearly did not come from the manufacturer. It does happen, I bought a vehicle from a vendors agent as the vendor was abroad. Nine months later I discovered it had a tracker fitted when the annual renewal came through. Said vendors agent had sent all the transfer papers off after sale and had'nt thought to tell me. Nice surprise in my case though.

Phil

430Devil

20 posts

214 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
If you had an electric garage door I assume you could get away with it if you could prove that it did actually open your garage....couldn't you?

Stu R

21,410 posts

229 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
woof said:
i bet there's no such case - just spin
just what I was thinking, sounds like something the Daily Star would have reported

Zoom_Jones

858 posts

273 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
Telegraph said:
A laser transmitter designed to open gates or garage doors automatically also blocks police speed guns, it has emerged.

John Eady
John Eady was found guilty of using the device to block
speed detector guns

A businessman with nine points on his driving licence has been convicted of perverting the course of justice after a jury found he used the device - known as the Target LT (Laser Track) 400 - to block detector guns and avoid a further speeding conviction.

John Eady, 61, from Sheffield, was disqualified from driving for 12 months and fined £5,000 at Doncaster Crown Court after he was found guilty earlier this month.

Last night, the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, Meredydd Hughes, the head of roads policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said he believed Eady was the first person to be convicted for using such a device.

He added: "Roads policing officers have been briefed on how to detect the devices in action and the appropriate steps to be taken to ensure the successful prosecution of the law-breakers who use them."

Eady's claim that he did not know the device had been fitted to his Range Rover was not accepted by the jury.
advertisement

The LT400 is said to be the first device of its kind available in Britain and is sold with the warning that it should only be used for the purposes for which it was designed - opening things.

However, sales literature makes clear it interferes with other radar devices, including police speed guns, though it maintains that when it senses a police gun it switches off after five seconds.

One sales page points out that "as well as functioning as an automatic remote control system, the LT400 is also an effective counter-measure against police speed laser guns.

The system will alert you effectively to the presence of police laser and whilst ensuring that no speed reading is obtained.

"Please note that this is not legal in all countries and you should check local laws before use. "

Another page states: "Please be aware that to use it to actively interfere with police laser guns may be deemed an offence."

The device retails from around £290.

Police were alerted on June 6 last year when Eady, who owns a laboratory equipment business, drove through a 40mph zone where a mobile speed check was taking place.

Believing Eady to be speeding, an officer aimed a laser speed gun at the Range Rover but the speed was not registered and the gun instead showed an error message. He was traced to his home and police discovered the device.

There were no similar devices fitted to the door of his garage, which was used for storage. The LT400 can be bought as a car-only device or as one with a home fitting to go on a garage.

Judge Jacqueline Davies told Eady, who had driven more than 140,000 miles in the last four years: "I am satisfied that you took deliberate action in acquiring this equipment with a view to avoiding further points from a laser gun."

B19TOY

540 posts

298 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
How could an innocent person detect if a device like this was already fitted to their previously used car?

Westy Pre-Lit

5,088 posts

217 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
I find this a bit strange. Laser as far as i know it is a form of light. How can a laser then be used open up a garage door as the receiver unit is placed within the garage?

All the openers i know use a radio frequency. confused

ATG

22,066 posts

286 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
Telegraph merrily mixing laser and radar as if ther were no difference ... ho, hum. Garage door opener, my arse. These things are quite clearly jammers. Garage door openers have a button which you press when you want the garage door to open or close. There is no reason at all why they should be active at any other time. How anyone thinks they can use "it's a garage door opener" as a defence, I can't imagine. The obvious next question is "why were you trying to open your garage door while you were still on the M25, 60 miles from home?"

freedman

5,959 posts

221 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
You dont need to 'activate' all of them some are set up to open the 'garage doors when withn councation dstance of the garage door

cvegas

323 posts

217 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
This seems like an injust conviction. Surley they would need to prove that he had fitted the device. I thought the law stated innocent until proven guilty.

skymaster

731 posts

221 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all
I seem to remember the company that made the jammers also sold a transponder that when paired with the jammer would open a door or similar. There is another device called laser park pro which is meant to act as a parking sensor. How good it is compared to other aftermarket parking sensors I have no idea but it would certainly be a more convincing defence.

I have since sold my old car that was fully loaded with jammers, I PX'd it so god only knows if the current driver has any idea that they are fitted.

It's a sad thing that speeding enforcement has come to such a dire state as to motivate 1000s of drivers to fit jammers, then even sadder that the authorities try to clamp down on them in this way. It's hardly very sporting is it?

Helluvaname

365 posts

221 months

Friday 31st August 2007
quotequote all