RE: Camera cash KO
Tuesday 2nd October 2007

Camera cash KO

Beginning of the end?



A council has slashed its budget for speed cameras because it says they are more about making money than saving lives.

North Somerset Council used to give £300,000 a year towards funding cameras in the area.

But members have now decided to cut the funding by £100,000.

And they warn they may give NOTHING next year because they claim so much taxpayers' cash is wasted on public relations and red tape.

Camera bosses have accused the council of being irresponsible.

A spokesman for the West of England Road Safety Partnership said: "This will put lives at risk. The vast majority of residents agree that cameras play a vital role in cutting speeds and casualties."

But North Somerset's transport chief Elfan Ap Rees said: "Motorists have wised up to where the cameras are and slow down and then speed up again."

And he accused the Government of using speed fines to swell Treasury coffers instead of ploughing the money back into road safety schemes.

Captain Gatso, campaigns director of Motorists Against Detection, told Pistonheads: "Now the authorities have finally woken up to the truth that we, the under-siege motorists, have known all along - it's all about raising money. The end is nigh for speed cameras!"

Author
Discussion

Graebob

Original Poster:

2,172 posts

238 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
smokin

waynepixel

3,978 posts

255 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Graebob said:
smokin
idea

Chrisgr31

14,294 posts

286 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
I read about this in the newspaper at the weekend. Its strange the Camera Partnership say its a bad decision isn;t it! I assume they are not worried their gravy train has hit the buffers?

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

265 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
wavey

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

286 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
A spokesman for the West of England Road Safety Partnership said:
This will put lifestyles at risk. How on earth am I going to afford to put a 42" Plasma TV into my luxury yacht if the council stops pouring money down a bottomless pit of deception and lies?

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

239 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Jolly good, now for the other councils to follow suit.

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

257 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Oh well...if there's no money for the camera partnerships that's them out of a job. What a ing shame!!

shout Yippeeeeee!!!!!! bounce

TangoAlpha

1,175 posts

285 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Would this mean that if any cameras are torched that they won't be able to afford to replace them? scratchchin


hehe

Frimley111R

19,397 posts

265 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Surely this is a leaked April 1st press release?

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

249 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Do we know where the £200k saved is going?

Or is it a case of, "Gordon's just slashed our budgets, so in return we're going to tell him to stick his surveillance society where the sun doesn't shine."

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

245 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Looks like councils have finally realised that the money from these things is squandered on nothing and they dont get a single thing out of them. I think that we will get this sort of news more and more often as the cameras fade into obscurity. The government simply doesnt want to admit that they were a huge mistake. Besides, they have probably got another great con on the way (road pricing??)

AL666

2,679 posts

249 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
Do we know where the £200k saved is going?

Or is it a case of, "Gordon's just slashed our budgets, so in return we're going to tell him to stick his surveillance society where the sun doesn't shine."
£100k saving, but still, I wonder where that's going...

And I'm happy that one council has wised up.

Droptheclutch

2,622 posts

256 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
TangoAlpha said:
Would this mean that if any cameras are torched that they won't be able to afford to replace them? scratchchin


hehe
PML...tuftuf club away!!!!!!!

Apache

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
TangoAlpha said:
Would this mean that if any cameras are torched that they won't be able to afford to replace them? scratchchin


hehe
yes has been for a while, none of the 'recalibrated' ones round my neck of the woods have been replaced

AlexKP

16,484 posts

275 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
I think Captain Gatso might be getting a bit carried away...

MitchT

17,158 posts

240 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
Do we know where the £200k saved is going?
Half to employ people to dig holes. The other half to employ people to fill them in again.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

248 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Can you hear that > < ?

It's the sound of the world's smallest violin playing just for the scamera partnerships.

motormania

1,143 posts

284 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Question: How does David Cameron win the next election?

Answer: Pledges that all speed cameras will be removed and more police cars put back on the roads :0

Might just be a land slide then...

don logan

4,011 posts

253 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Shouldn`t that read LORD Elfan ap Rees?????

Knight him at once!

mark69sheer

3,906 posts

233 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
A word of warning to all you people who think that cameras are a total rip off.

I do actually as a few mph over the limit is a victimless 'offence' as far as I am concerned.

However

I come from a time before speed cameras , I pods and the X factor when instead of speed cameras whose locations were known you had officers with speed guns. . . . . .wherever they liked.

and if that was miles away from the rest of the world on your favourite bit of country road or hidden behind any hedge or bridge.

Then thats where they were.


Be warned you may even hark back to the 'good old days' when there were stationary permanently sited speed cameras.