Surrey unmarked police car
Author
Discussion

JRM

Original Poster:

2,065 posts

263 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
Saw some poor so and so pulled over last night by an unmarked BMW 5 series, looked like it was dark blue. They were operating on the A3 around Kingston last night, so make sure you check who is sitting in any blue 5 series beemers you pass on the A3!

Shar2

2,274 posts

244 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
It's not just the Beemer, there appears to be an unmarked Volvo operating in the area as well. I've seen the BM many times on the A3 up at Roehampton Vale.

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
JRM said:
Saw some poor so and so pulled over last night by an unmarked BMW 5 series, looked like it was dark blue. They were operating on the A3 around Kingston last night, so make sure you check who is sitting in any blue 5 series beemers you pass on the A3!
Why the sympathy? Do you know why they were pulled & the result?

EU_Foreigner

2,838 posts

257 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
Because unfortunately, that is the reputation the police have built up ...

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
Because unfortunately, that is the reputation the police have built up ...
Police or camera partnerships? I thought everyone was crying out for more traffic BIBS?

JRM

Original Poster:

2,065 posts

263 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
I'd like to think that he was a wanted murderer or maybe a MLM, but lets face it the have built a reputation for pulling people over when they are bored just because they were going a bit quick on a deserted three lane road, just because they have nothing better to do.

Can't help thinking they might be better tasked with tackling terrorism or something

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

246 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
JRM said:
I'd like to think that he was a wanted murderer or maybe a MLM, but lets face it the have built a reputation for pulling people over when they are bored just because they were going a bit quick on a deserted three lane road, just because they have nothing better to do.

Can't help thinking they might be better tasked with tackling terrorism or something
rolleyes

John57

1,870 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
That blue BMW will be our car then .... the one that pulled the supposed drink driver circulated by other drivers as swerving, speeding and generally driving erratically.

But then if you don't want us to pull people who are supposedly drink driving I will tell the guys to concentrate on speeding - something I believe that car didn't deal with last night at all ...

EU_Foreigner

2,838 posts

257 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
Sheriff JWPepper said:
EU_Foreigner said:
Because unfortunately, that is the reputation the police have built up ...
Police or camera partnerships? I thought everyone was crying out for more traffic BIBS?
I mentioned reputation, not quantity.

JRM

Original Poster:

2,065 posts

263 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
John57 said:
That blue BMW will be our car then .... the one that pulled the supposed drink driver circulated by other drivers as swerving, speeding and generally driving erratically.

But then if you don't want us to pull people who are supposedly drink driving I will tell the guys to concentrate on speeding - something I believe that car didn't deal with last night at all ...
thumbup great if that's the case, and fair enough, but it isn't always the case and I know plenty of officers who have played 'snooker' when they are bored, pulling up cars of the right colour.

Always reassuring to know if there is someone doing a job properly though

TTwiggy

11,884 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
Ultimately it's a game isn't it? We (motorists) will exceed the speed limit, and the police will do their job and stop us. We will reserve the right to give each other a 'heads up' on unmarked cars, location of camera vans etc, and the police will reserve the right to take any approach (from 'telling off' to points/fine) that they wish to when they catch us.

I think that both sides need to remove some chips from their shoulders...

LathamJohnP

4,477 posts

315 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
If the purpose of traffic police is to increase road safety, and reducing speeding increases road safety, then publicly identifying unmarked police cars will make the roads safer, since we'll see them and slow down.

Or something.

John

BertBert

21,330 posts

242 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
Ultimately it's a game isn't it? We (motorists) will exceed the speed limit, and the police will do their job and stop us. We will reserve the right to give each other a 'heads up' on unmarked cars, location of camera vans etc, and the police will reserve the right to take any approach (from 'telling off' to points/fine) that they wish to when they catch us.

I think that both sides need to remove some chips from their shoulders...
If you remove the "exceed the speed limit" and replace with "drive like wrs some of the time", then I would entirely agree with the widened definition.

Mind you, I have been driving about in my trafpol magnet (white GT3 RS) for 3 weeks now and not even a hint of trafpol interest. Clearly I will have to drive faster and more stupidly!

Bert

allaway

353 posts

253 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
LathamJohnP said:
If the purpose of traffic police is to increase road safety, and reducing speeding increases road safety, then publicly identifying unmarked police cars will make the roads safer, since we'll see them and slow down.

Or something.

John
Then when they are not about drivers are doing 172 mph, driving straight thru red lights and carving up other drivers?

Edited by allaway on Tuesday 13th November 18:02