Nothing like our tax money attempting to help absolute scum
Discussion
kers you KILLED someone, you took a life, you should be in there for literally LIFE! Your sentences are not excessive enough.Spax has a point. The law is saying a policeman's life is worth more, about 4-6 times more, and that can only demoralise.
It should be 35 years for all. Period.
The reason they appeal is indeed because a) they can ( not brought up to accept responsibility as part of a whole generation ) and b) the sentence is officially outrageous.
I have no obejctions to 35 years for murder - matters not your profession. With such a cold and clear penalty, maybe tw-ats would think again.
It should be 35 years for all. Period.
The reason they appeal is indeed because a) they can ( not brought up to accept responsibility as part of a whole generation ) and b) the sentence is officially outrageous.
I have no obejctions to 35 years for murder - matters not your profession. With such a cold and clear penalty, maybe tw-ats would think again.
The difference in sentencing for the murder of a police officer should be the difference between "the drop" and being hoisted by a crane in the local shopping centre.
I see no reason why the murder of a police officer should not be treated differently. By virtue of their job we owe them that respect. This type of respect is vastly different to that which they need to earn and maintain - S]
What we don't want is pathetically short sentences for the murder of MoP and long sentences for the murder of BiB. That does indeed send the wrong message. Not that the BiB's life was more valuable, but that a MoP's was of so little account.
Streaky
I see no reason why the murder of a police officer should not be treated differently. By virtue of their job we owe them that respect. This type of respect is vastly different to that which they need to earn and maintain - S]
What we don't want is pathetically short sentences for the murder of MoP and long sentences for the murder of BiB. That does indeed send the wrong message. Not that the BiB's life was more valuable, but that a MoP's was of so little account.
Streaky
WE should appeal that the sentences weren't death!!!
Mind you the spineless Labour scum want such criminals as voters as they're fast running out of them! remember them wanting prisoners to get the vote...AFAIK prisoners have no rights!!!
edited fur dyslexic fnigers
Mind you the spineless Labour scum want such criminals as voters as they're fast running out of them! remember them wanting prisoners to get the vote...AFAIK prisoners have no rights!!!
edited fur dyslexic fnigers
Edited by JMGS4 on Tuesday 18th December 08:36
jondude said:
It should be 35 years for all. Period.
No. Life should mean life, not a little over half of your life. If you are sentenced to life it should mean that you will never walk the streets as a free man again, ever. You will die in prison. And it should be life at hard labour too. In fact ALL prisoners, regardless of length of sentence should be made to do labour. Bring on the chain gangs and rock quarries.Strangely Brown said:
jondude said:
It should be 35 years for all. Period.
No. Life should mean life, not a little over half of your life. If you are sentenced to life it should mean that you will never walk the streets as a free man again, ever. You will die in prison. And it should be life at hard labour too. In fact ALL prisoners, regardless of length of sentence should be made to do labour. Bring on the chain gangs and rock quarries.Do you want these scumbags living in society? Or rather, living full stop? Hell no!
Hang em high!
Santa Claws said:
Strangely Brown said:
jondude said:
It should be 35 years for all. Period.
No. Life should mean life, not a little over half of your life. If you are sentenced to life it should mean that you will never walk the streets as a free man again, ever. You will die in prison. And it should be life at hard labour too. In fact ALL prisoners, regardless of length of sentence should be made to do labour. Bring on the chain gangs and rock quarries.Do you want these scumbags living in society? Or rather, living full stop? Hell no!
Hang em high!
All the time that there is the possibility that an innocent person may be convicted then the death penalty is quite simply not an option. If there were a method to ascertain guilt beyond any possible doubt, absolute and irreproachable then yes, hang 'em. Until that day arrives (which it never will) then I'll settle for life at hard labour.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff