Digitial Speed Cameras
Author
Discussion

wrinx

Original Poster:

680 posts

271 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/new...

The noose tightens!

wrinx

Edited by wrinx on Saturday 29th December 16:51

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
the comments make sense - surprising considering the site.

esselte

14,626 posts

298 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
Seems typical of today's "targetted policing"...squeeze every last drop out of the low hanging frui........

Vipers

33,524 posts

259 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
If it catches undertakers, middle morons, and sods who pull out from the slip lane thinking they have gods gift to do so, fine, but I cant see how eating a sandwich is dangerous, when we all agree we have to move our hand to change gear. Maybe rolling a ciggie, which must be a very minority indeed, well what can one say. Roll them before you set out, as I suspect those who roll their own do so anyway.

If my other half offer me a sweet when we are in the car, I just hold my hand out and she puts in it, no problem, will this be banned as well.

If they are so concerned about reducing distractions when driving, why not insist on all cars should be automatic?. And all cars should have radio controls on the steering wheel as well.

Whilst I dont agree with using phones whilst driving, I do think this is a step too far for the average driver.

Digressing a bit, a guy in the papers the other day had been subjected to identy theft, amassing loads of parking tickets, etc etc, what did the police say about it "Well technically a crime has been committed, we cant intervene", or words to that............The guy is going to change his name by deed poll and move house to get away from it all. Sad affairs indeed. (sorry to digress, but this just grips my shit).


frown



Edited by Vipers on Saturday 29th December 17:26

dirkgently

2,160 posts

262 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
MOP said:
It is funny how the police never have any trouble in finding ways of clamping down on normal people's minor misdemeanours but don't have the "resources" to tackle real crime.

I will never help another police officer in their duties again. In my book the lazy cowards are worse than the criminal themselves.

- Andrew Myers, Leicester, UK.
I feel sorry for all the decent Bib who are going to pay the price in the long run.
At least their masters gave them an honest pay rise.
laugh

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

240 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
This is real big brother shit!

One step closer to a totally controlled dictatorship.

Something needs to be done and the sooner the better!

wrinx

Original Poster:

680 posts

271 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
dirkgently said:
MOP said:
It is funny how the police never have any trouble in finding ways of clamping down on normal people's minor misdemeanours but don't have the "resources" to tackle real crime.

I will never help another police officer in their duties again. In my book the lazy cowards are worse than the criminal themselves.

- Andrew Myers, Leicester, UK.
Until he gets burgled or has his car stolen. Stupid man rolleyes

wrinx

PottyMouth

470 posts

227 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
In reality these cameras are only going to be used for the more serious "control of vehicle" offences.

SURELY..... the people who moaned that gatsos don't catch dangerous drivers are not now moaning that steps are being taken in the direction of realising that reality????!?

vonhosen

40,597 posts

248 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
PottyMouth said:
In reality these cameras are only going to be used for the more serious "control of vehicle" offences.

SURELY..... the people who moaned that gatsos don't catch dangerous drivers are not now moaning that steps are being taken in the direction of realising that reality????!?
People don't give up their favourite sport that easily, PH without moaning.......never.

aw51 121565

4,773 posts

264 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
This reporting of other offences by people operating mobile speed cameras already happens.

There was a case a few years ago in North Wales where a female driver exceeding the speed limit while applying make up was reported by 'Arrive Alive' for more than just the speeding and the magistrates threw the book at her when the video was produced in court.

If things are *that* serious we should have many more trafpol on the road. The rollout of these 'special' cameras will just alienate the public further smile . But in the great dumbing down of the 21st Century, this isn't exactly an unexpected development what with the Highways Agency staff reporting motorway offences (eg. misuse of hard shoulder, or not obeying red X signs) that are then successfully prosecuted, is it?

falcemob

8,248 posts

267 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
That's all a bit of a bugger, I'll have to be carefull now when I'm eating my sandwiches, drinking coffee and reading my collection notes.

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
PottyMouth said:
In reality these cameras are only going to be used for the more serious "control of vehicle" offences.

SURELY..... the people who moaned that gatsos don't catch dangerous drivers are not now moaning that steps are being taken in the direction of realising that reality????!?
if i had any belief they'd be used to catch dangerous drivers then id be all for it. as it stands i see them all going for the easy targets to make a profit.

dougc

8,241 posts

296 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
wrinx said:
dirkgently said:
MOP said:
It is funny how the police never have any trouble in finding ways of clamping down on normal people's minor misdemeanours but don't have the "resources" to tackle real crime.

I will never help another police officer in their duties again. In my book the lazy cowards are worse than the criminal themselves.

- Andrew Myers, Leicester, UK.
Until he gets burgled or has his car stolen. Stupid man rolleyes

wrinx
Crime number over the phone is the standard policy now isn't it?

catso

16,540 posts

298 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
wrinx said:
dirkgently said:
MOP said:
It is funny how the police never have any trouble in finding ways of clamping down on normal people's minor misdemeanours but don't have the "resources" to tackle real crime.

I will never help another police officer in their duties again. In my book the lazy cowards are worse than the criminal themselves.

- Andrew Myers, Leicester, UK.
Until he gets burgled or has his car stolen. Stupid man rolleyes

wrinx
You may or may not agree with his comments but it matters not as there are more & increasingly more people thinking like this.

This, IMHO, is much more important to the future of Policing of this country than the disputed x.xx%? Police payrise - a shame the 'authorities' can't (or won't) see this. frown

Do0Bs

227 posts

228 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
PottyMouth said:
In reality these cameras are only going to be used for the more serious "control of vehicle" offences.

SURELY..... the people who moaned that gatsos don't catch dangerous drivers are not now moaning that steps are being taken in the direction of realising that reality????!?
How is smoking dangerous driving?

How is eating a sweet or anything else dangerous?

Were not moaning. If it catches the wrs who dont have clue how to drive safely then fair enough, but from what it said in the article its going to be used on minor "offences" such as i just stated.

The day it catches some tit pulling out on someone without checking mirrors causing some poor soul to swerve and put his life in danger i will praise it.

cptsideways

13,894 posts

283 months

Saturday 29th December 2007
quotequote all
$afety my a$$