Have i been done? (and what was he using)
Have i been done? (and what was he using)
Author
Discussion

David87M3

Original Poster:

1,470 posts

265 months

Monday 28th January 2008
quotequote all
On my way back from work yesterday there was a police man stood at the side of the road. He was holiding a mobile device (unknown).
I guess I was doing about 30-35 (my speedo over reads)..... when compared to my road angel
The thing he had hold of was held close to his lower chest, he was not looking into it and it was not connected to any other unit.
Do modern mobile speed measuring units record images onto some kind of datacard inside the gun? or could it have been some kind of measuring device and if any cars were speeding he would of stopped us there and then?

I dont think it was a laser gun as he would have had to be looking through the lens to aim it accurately and passing cars

Thanks

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Monday 28th January 2008
quotequote all
David87M3 said:
..or could it have been some kind of measuring device and if any cars were speeding he would of stopped us there and then?
Chill.

If it was a proper police officer, he would almost certainly have pulled you over at the time had you given him reason to do so..

EU_Foreigner

2,838 posts

257 months

Monday 28th January 2008
quotequote all
Not necessarily. I am not aware that speedtraps set up by the police themselves always stop people they catch.

Also note it is coming to the end of the month, so targets need to be met and he might not have had time to stop each car ...

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

275 months

Monday 28th January 2008
quotequote all
One of them electronic devices for measuring distance - so he can draw up an accident sketch plan?

dvd

G51CAV

926 posts

229 months

Monday 28th January 2008
quotequote all
EU_Foreigner said:
Also note it is coming to the end of the month, so targets need to be met and he might not have had time to stop each car ...
What rubbish!

They could have been their for all sorts of reasons.
DVD's suggestion of it being an accident investigator is entirely possible.
It could also have been traffic management assessing the site for future works/restrictions or they may simply have been monitoring traffic flow for a variety of reasons.

If you were doing 30-35mph then you have nothing to worry about unless of course it's a 20 limit.

JamesFiesta

541 posts

227 months

Tuesday 29th January 2008
quotequote all
This talk of targets is utter s**t! there is no set 'you will catch at least 100 speeding motorists a month' type statistic set by Govt. Sorry to be so blunt but it really does boil my p*ss!

The suggestion of somebody measuring a distance is perfectly plausible. Likewise is it a handheld laser speed gun, which he may or may not have been resting at the time, as with the handheld guns, you need to evidence what caused you to suspect the vehicle may have been speeding 'bonnet raising sharply, sound of sharp acceleration, vehicle coming at you like a Harrier on takeoff' etc etc.

Also bear in mind with handheld speed guns, you will usually get stopped at the time, unless the officer clocks onto the fact that you're going so fast he'll be turned into red goo on the road if he attempts to stop you.

One more point is that they set thresholds, ie: they may be in a 30mph zone, stopping people to give words of advice at 35mph, but not start offering out the SP30's until 40mph is crossed. This takes into account road conditions, time of day, whether little Timmy is running around in the road with his football or not and so on.

I don't think you have too much to worry about, I would have imagined you would have been stopped at the time as the comment about the officer being worried about you flattening him shouldn't apply (i think you would be expecting a NIP if this were the case.)

Jules360

1,949 posts

233 months

Tuesday 29th January 2008
quotequote all
JamesFiesta said:
... as with the handheld guns, you need to evidence what caused you to suspect the vehicle may have been speeding 'bonnet raising sharply, sound of sharp acceleration, vehicle coming at you like a Harrier on takeoff' etc etc.
Yeah, of course you do ... laugh

Do0Bs

227 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th January 2008
quotequote all
JamesFiesta said:
... as with the handheld guns, you need to evidence what caused you to suspect the vehicle may have been speeding 'bonnet raising sharply, sound of sharp acceleration, vehicle coming at you like a Harrier on takeoff' etc etc.
Thats boocks

JamesFiesta

541 posts

227 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Tis the way it was explained to me.

Jules360

1,949 posts

233 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
JamesFiesta said:
Tis the way it was explained to me.
There is a difference between what SHOULD be done and what IS done.

JamesFiesta

541 posts

227 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
laugh of course, the idea of having those things to evidence comes from the little training manual of rubbish, along with things like 'making up your mind whether to issue a FPN before you leave your vehicle'...

i'm just thinking that on the day in question, said officer with said device may have decided that it wasn't worth checking the OP because he wasn't moving like a cheetah with a homing missile up his ar$e.

Edited by JamesFiesta on Wednesday 30th January 09:22

EU_Foreigner

2,838 posts

257 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
and there are monthly targets - well known fact confirmed by a serving police officer

JamesFiesta

541 posts

227 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
News to me... i've never been sent out to catch myself 100 SP30's per month.