This would never have happened if London had a 20 mph limit
This would never have happened if London had a 20 mph limit
Author
Discussion

711

Original Poster:

806 posts

256 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Now we've got cameras and civil servants instead of Police, I think we're going to see a fair bit more of this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7217410....

Never mind, I'm sure the cheap network of average speed cameras will prevent this type of thing in the future. rolleyes

flemke

23,515 posts

268 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Absolutely. It's amazing how much a 20 limit will improve the driving of someone who's on crystal meth.

paranha

633 posts

273 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
It would/WILL happen with a full compliment of police,and happen many times due to the fact that we dont have a Govt that ensures the Judges give a proper sentence for the crime, and prisons to put them in.

havoc

33,505 posts

266 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
paranha said:
It would/WILL happen with a full compliment of police,and happen many times due to the fact that we dont have a Govt that ensures the Judges give a proper sentence for the crime, and prisons to put them in.
We need both. For the justice system to work as a deterrent, you need both a high chance of detection AND a meaningful punishment.

Take either one away and people start not caring. Take BOTH away (seems to be the case for a lot of :cough: minor :cough: banghead crimes in the UK), and the crims will think it's Christmas come early...


When did common-sense disappear from our elected 'leaders' (sic)???

jondude

2,441 posts

248 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
I suppose it'a not rocket science IF we really wanted to all but eradicate speeding.

You either put cameras up along every road, every 200m, or you do as in the USA and employ real traffic cops who often outnumber locals, and who ALWAYS park at the entrance to towns or at junctions - so not only is the deterrent there, they are also saving lives.

Have always said that. A copper needs only park his marked car at a roundabout ( on it?? )and then he can listen to music and eat donuts all day - his very presence will SAVE lives.

I still cannot understand why we won't do this, or that with the hatred of cameras which are leading to alienation and loss of respect for the police, we have not had a politician come by who is brave enough to demand a new policy.

SlowMo

379 posts

248 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
You could have had 1000 police on the same street and this would have happened.

havoc

33,505 posts

266 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
SlowMo said:
You could have had 1000 police on the same street and this would have happened.
I'm not sure how you can say that. A very visible police presence is known to be a deterrent effect to criminal activity, and this includes being a junkie f'k-up.

711

Original Poster:

806 posts

256 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
SlowMo said:
You could have had 1000 police on the same street and this would have happened.
You're right in that you can never totally eliminate the behaviour of hardened criminals.

I don't think it's so easy to make the statement that more Policing would have failed to stop this incident though. His driving would surely have been erratic and likely cause for a stop?

If the criminal knows there will be solid road policing, he may have taken a method of transport less likely to draw attention from the law, i.e. the bus?

Additionally, by extending your logic, one might construct an argument that no enforcement is required at all; if something is always going to happen, the "police" should just be there to mop up the mess caused by the crime. Why bother trying to prevent anything? No need to stop people drunk/drug driving, just arrest them after they've had a smash. After all, we could have a 1000 police and it won't stop these people wink

I wouldn't be suprised if there *were* nearly a 1000 thousand CCTV and speed cameras in that area, and they didn't do a fat lot of good either.

Zod

35,295 posts

289 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
I love the way the headline picks out that he is a driver, but not that he is a drug fiend. rolleyes

SlowMo

379 posts

248 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

711

Original Poster:

806 posts

256 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
SlowMo said:
You're talking about someone on c.meth here . . . . the last thing going through his mind after a few day bringe with no sleep is the thought of getting caught.
OK, so he's determined to drive. Are you saying that decent amounts of road policing would have failed to detect his erratic driving style?

Vipers

33,524 posts

259 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
So I wonder which hand the Judge smacked for him?

frown

G51CAV

926 posts

229 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
havoc said:
paranha said:
It would/WILL happen with a full compliment of police,and happen many times due to the fact that we dont have a Govt that ensures the Judges give a proper sentence for the crime, and prisons to put them in.
We need both. For the justice system to work as a deterrent, you need both a high chance of detection AND a meaningful punishment.

Take either one away and people start not caring. Take BOTH away (seems to be the case for a lot of :cough: minor :cough: banghead crimes in the UK), and the crims will think it's Christmas come early...


When did common-sense disappear from our elected 'leaders' (sic)???
Have either of you ever considered becoming politicians?
You have both just made more sense in a couple of short paragraphs than the current regime have managed collectively in years!!!!!!!yes

havoc

33,505 posts

266 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
G51CAV said:
Have either of you ever considered becoming politicians?
Considered it and dismissed it just as quickly:-

1) The majority of people in this country don't actually like or want to be told the truth. They'd far rather be cotton-woolled with platitudes and statistics, until the truth breaks in through their back door and nicks all the valuable, of course...

2) Politics in this country is almost purely a big-party thing now, unless you've serious financial backing enabling you to stand as an independent. And I have no desire to join the arse-kissing be-assimilated-or-die machine that is a big party, nor the financial wherewithal to do it alone.

3) As a politician you suddenly become a target for any 2nd-rate paparazzi-wannabe and local muck-rag journo...doesn't appeal. No real skeletons, but that doesn't stop the attention nor the loonies...and I like my privacy!


...but thanks for the compliment!

Edited by havoc on Thursday 31st January 18:37

SlowMo

379 posts

248 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

711

Original Poster:

806 posts

256 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

WildCat

8,369 posts

274 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

Scraggles

7,619 posts

255 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
goto google and do an image search for

crystal +meth

You can get a pretty good idea of your face within a few years, assuming u make it that long...

Some people are pre-disposed to drugs and will take them no matter the consequence

http://www.methmadness.com/facesofmeth.html

dasherdiablo1

4,501 posts

252 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
SlowMo said:
You could have had 1000 police on the same street and this would have happened.
I don't agree....if they'd all been lined up...50 side by side....and 20 rows deep......he couldn't have driven through them all....

Well.....certainly not at 20mph

Edited by dasherdiablo1 on Friday 1st February 14:27

SlowMo

379 posts

248 months

Friday 1st February 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]