Negative breath test, not speeding but likely to be fined!!!
Discussion
Christmas day I was followed by a police car for about 3 miles, through 40 to 30 MPH limit. Driving at normal speed because I knew he was following. He followed me for about 3 miles before stopping me and discussing my speed, he had no proof of any offence, he then breathalised me this proved negative. He then carried out a PNC check and stated that my MOT was out of date and could I produce it within 7 days. I produced a new MOT as I was unable to locate the old one and I am now being charged with the offence of not having a current MOT (my mistake obviously but as TAX and insurance were in date didn't even cros my mind that it was out of date). How much would I expect to be fined for this offence?
As a side note did he have any grounds to stop me, he only used his blues to stop me (no siren) and then when he approached me he was not fully dressed (no hat or jacket as he stated in his statement).
Thanks for any responses.
As a side note did he have any grounds to stop me, he only used his blues to stop me (no siren) and then when he approached me he was not fully dressed (no hat or jacket as he stated in his statement).
Thanks for any responses.
Dwight VanDriver said:
Presume you old TC was over a month out of date?
Still only a nominal fine - no points.
Authority for B Test ?
No accident.
Moving Traffic Offence - No test cert ...yes
Smell of the Barmaids apron on the breath...yes if applicable.
dvd
Couldn't find old cert, spoke to one garage and they said it was still in date, but police say no.Still only a nominal fine - no points.
Authority for B Test ?
No accident.
Moving Traffic Offence - No test cert ...yes
Smell of the Barmaids apron on the breath...yes if applicable.
dvd
As I couldn't find old cert. just had it re-tested straight away (day after Boxing day) basically the first opportunity.
Now I have court summons, with a potential max £1000 fine

SS2. said:
Jizz Monkey said:
Couldn't find old cert, spoke to one garage and they said it was still in date, but police say no.
And have you been summoned specifically for no test certificate, as opposed to failing to produce a valid test certificate ?falcemob said:
Why didn't you get a duplicate certificate?
Despite one garage saying the car was MoT'd, the police stated the car was not MoT'd, or at least they couldn't find any evidence that an in date cert. existed. So what the feck is the point in have a computerised MoT system ??Plus the panic of not having a cert. I wanted to be legal so got a new one ASAP. If I found the old one then the new one was just a backup.
Plus I didn't know you could re-print a cert.
Hindsight and knowledge is a dangerous combination

Edited by Jizz Monkey on Saturday 2nd February 17:00
In short, you failed to produce a test certificate when required and, in doing so, committed an offence.
Damage limitation:
An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3.
Also, you could attend court for sentencing and offer mitigation in person - dress smartly, be polite and state the chain of events as you have done here..
A sympathetic bench could see you 'escape' with a negligible fine, although you will probably remain liable for court costs (~£40) and the £15 Victim SupportTax Surcharge..
Damage limitation:
An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3.
Also, you could attend court for sentencing and offer mitigation in person - dress smartly, be polite and state the chain of events as you have done here..
A sympathetic bench could see you 'escape' with a negligible fine, although you will probably remain liable for court costs (~£40) and the £15 Victim Support
Edited by SS2. on Saturday 2nd February 17:08
So the Police say that you were using a vehicle without a valid MOT. You obtained a new MOT, which wont be retrospective, so will not help that offence, but are now summoned for just failing to produce a valid MOT.
Unless I've missed something, isn't the former more serious? Not wishing you to be done for a more serious offence, but I'm intrigued as to why the change.
7.
Unless I've missed something, isn't the former more serious? Not wishing you to be done for a more serious offence, but I'm intrigued as to why the change.
7.
SS2. said:
In short, you failed to produce a test certificate when required and, in doing so, committed an offence.
Damage limitation:
An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3.
Also, you could attend court for sentencing and offer mitigation in person - dress smartly, be polite and state the chain of events as you have done here..
A sympathetic bench could see you 'escape' with a negligible fine, although you will probably remain liable for court costs (~£40) and the £15 Victim SupportTax Surcharge..
Thanks for that SS2, basically that is the plan, at the end of the day when I couldn't find the MoT I got a new one as soon as I could.Damage limitation:
An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3.
Also, you could attend court for sentencing and offer mitigation in person - dress smartly, be polite and state the chain of events as you have done here..
A sympathetic bench could see you 'escape' with a negligible fine, although you will probably remain liable for court costs (~£40) and the £15 Victim Support
Edited by SS2. on Saturday 2nd February 17:08
When you say "An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3." do you mean what ever the fine is going to be?
It's certainly been interesting all the comments people have been made, and I certainly will be keeping that WEB address in the old favourites.
Edited by Jizz Monkey on Saturday 2nd February 18:40
Jizz Monkey said:
When you say "An early guilty plea would qualify for a sentence reduction of up to 1/3." do you mean what ever the fine is going to be?
Yes. If you enter a guilty plea at the first reasonable opportunity, you are rewarded by having the sentence (in your case, whatever the fine would have been) reduced by a suggested 1/3. The level of the reduction is a sliding scale and drops down to a suggested 1/10 for a change of plea to guilty on the day of the trial itself.
The offence itself will carry guideline fine levels which the Magistrates will consider. They will also take into account your ability to pay - you will be required to complete a means form before sentencing. They will also listen to anything you want to say in mitigation of the offence.
The Magistrates will then determine the final figure based upon the combination of these factors...
At least that's how its supposed to work..

a boardman said:
can you still get a copy of the old test certificate even if you have a new one, at least it would show you had a valid mot but no certificate.
JM has been summoned for failing to produce a valid test certificate, as opposed to not having a valid test certificate. Whilst the fact that the car was still MOT'd might help with his mitigation, its not relevant to the actual charge he has to answer..Edited by SS2. on Saturday 2nd February 19:30
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


