RE: Lewisham To Be 20mph Zone
RE: Lewisham To Be 20mph Zone
Thursday 21st February 2008

Lewisham To Be 20mph Zone

London borough to trial total 20mph zone - others to follow


Set to become a more common sight?
Set to become a more common sight?
Lewisham is set to become the first London council to introduce a 20mph speed limit on practically every road, it has been reported.

Currently there is a 30mph maximum, but Lewisham could become a pioneer for a virtually blanket 20mph limit.

The new proposals are said to have been inspired by the Green Party and the council’s sustainable development select committee is understood to have voted in favour of it.

If the scheme goes ahead Lewisham would become a guinea pig for the rest of the capital.

The proposals are being pushed through to eliminate the need for costly speed humps and encourage people to walk or cycle.

Up until now 20mph zones have been limited to small areas but London mayor Ken Livingstone is understood to be keen to introduce them across the capital.

The AA has warned that 20mph zones will only make travel more difficult and argues 20mph zones should only be in sensitive or residential areas.

Author
Discussion

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,849 posts

289 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Let's all walk.

dougc

8,241 posts

296 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Another nail in the coffin of a once great city reduced to a socialist state by a power mad communist.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

258 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
20 in Lewisham...anything lower than 50 there and you'll lose your wheels!

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

256 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
I watched 'V for Vendetta' the other night...perhaps this should now be considered and 'instructional video' rather than a movie?

TTwiggy

11,884 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
I live on the edge of the borough - I'll adhere to the limit when all the unlicensed, uninsured, untaxed, unroadworthy, illegal mini cabbing locals are taken off the road (which will reduce congestion by around 90%)...

thegman

1,928 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
how does setting a speed limit of 20 get rid of the need for speed bumps?

surely speed bumps are just to stop people speeding. i didnt realise speed bumps were designed to prevent me from driving AT the legal limit.

supermono

7,464 posts

279 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Makes no difference to me. It's obvious by now that livingstone has created a monster of a place in London with his birdbrain ideas, I long since stopped doing business there.

The whole green/anti-car/pro-empty bus/CCTV/big brother/parking tickets/pro-congestion traffic systems/congestion charging/etc/etc have written off London for many people. And that's not even considering the stabbings/muggings/graffiti/antisocial ghettos which the law aren't interested in.

It's just a matter of time before business calls it a day and starts to migrate to somewhere nice, along with the people who aren't interested in bullst like this.

Then the perps will preside over an empty festering pit of a place and presumably feel pleased at what they've created.

My only worry is that susceptible councils elsewhere will start to jump on the band wagon before the st really hits the fan.

SM

The Hypno-Toad

13,347 posts

236 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Errr.... forgive me if I'm wrong but isn't an engine at that speed at its most inefficent? So therefore will be using more fuel and causing more greenhouse gases. (if you believe the tree huggers & Ken himself.)

And basically all because we have a generation of parents who are so st at controlling their kids they won't even tell them off for shop lifting, let alone how to cross a road properly.

I'm going to be really nasty here. 20mph outside schools or hospitals, no worries. Anywhere else you are just pandering to people who are too stupid to cross the road properly and if they did get knocked down would sue you anyway because its always some elses fault.

Its like the sweet little kid advert. "If you hit me at 40 I'll die, if you hit me at 30 I'll live."
Heres an idea sweetheart, try looking both ways before you cross the f****ng road! evil



Edited by The Hypno-Toad on Thursday 21st February 11:07

Dr G

16,006 posts

273 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Oh FFS; seems the only way to have any freedoms these days is to get yourself thrown in prison rolleyes

Broken Hero

1,198 posts

228 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Lewisham is sthole best avoided anyway.

potatoboy666

108 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Broken Hero said:
Lewisham is sthole best avoided anyway.
It's true, (coming from someone who lives there.)

At least this isn't resorting to speed bumps. But still on most roads 20 is a bit too low. I keep up with cars on my bike, then they try and squash me when they get to a speed bump.

DamoLLb

1,775 posts

226 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
The AA has warned that 20mph zones will only make travel more difficult and argues 20mph zones should only be in sensitive or residential areas


KEN YOU COCK WHY DO YOU ONLY LISTEN TO YOUR ahole, TRY LISTENING TO THOSE WHO KNOW

g_stacey

644 posts

264 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Hmmmmm. I motorbike through there most days to work in central London. The trouble with the same jouney every day is, you become complacement to traffic conditions. You learn to know when the traffic builds up where the idiots will pull a u-turn. You almost ride on auto pilot. Not good. So often I'll vary my commute. I'm never in a hurry to get to work. So if the 20mph limit happens I'll detour through Greenwhich or Dulwich. When I cycle it I usually hit 27mph down Loam Pit Hill. Hope they put a speed camera there!
At 20mph drivers will become so bored, there be reading papers, on the phone, puting on make-up and helping there kids with the homework. Oh well maybe somethings won't change.

A load of old B•••••ks

G

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

257 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Oh well.... another cancer begins to spread.... spin

Cure anyone?? tank

svassileou

229 posts

288 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Isn't there meant to be some sort of consultation process on this?

mx-tro

290 posts

251 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Blanket policy is simply a result of absense of any other ideas. Of course to actually think about a sensible useful policy would be beyond the capability of most politicians.

Despite this being touted as a trial, looks like we will be needing some direct action in Lewisham before the rot spreads.

Malcolm

dougc

8,241 posts

296 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
svassileou said:
Isn't there meant to be some sort of consultation process on this?
rofl You appear to be under the impression that you have a choice when in Kentopia. Didn't you hear? They know what's best for you!

SpeedyGonzales

7,211 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
I'm sure there was an article on PH a few weeks back mentioning that going driving slowly doesn't help the environment.So in theory that would make Lewisham the worst place to live because of all the C02 increase from going 20mph.

Why can't our government decide on one thing a stick to it?

svassileou

229 posts

288 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
Believe me - I intend to make my choice when the mayoral elections come around. However, if there's somewhere on the TfL or Lewisham Borough site that I can vent my spleen about this then I'm more than happy to express my views in the colourful language of my choosing, whether they're listened to or not.

chrisbr68

5,500 posts

279 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
The only reason mentioned for this was the fact of encouraging people to walk - that is it!!!

Why dont we make it 5 and then there really will be an incentive to walk, oh wait, people are too lazy.