Article on recent Yorke & Mawdesley judgement
Discussion
Found this article in the motoring Telegraph:
http://tinyurl.com/jhjt It's a point of view but we still won't know until a few brave souls have been to court, and possibly someone to argue all the way to the court of appeal again!
http://tinyurl.com/jhjt It's a point of view but we still won't know until a few brave souls have been to court, and possibly someone to argue all the way to the court of appeal again!
Read this this morning too. It's an interesting take on the whole murky area of unsigned NIPS as admissible/non-admissible evidence.
Fenton Bresler's conclusion, that nothing will change until/unless the relevant section of the RTA is re-drafted and made law, seems to accept the status quo - that the current law is a mess and the Yorke/Mawdesley cases have contributed nothing new towards clarifying it.
Fenton Bresler's conclusion, that nothing will change until/unless the relevant section of the RTA is re-drafted and made law, seems to accept the status quo - that the current law is a mess and the Yorke/Mawdesley cases have contributed nothing new towards clarifying it.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff