Learner done for Due Care, £400 & 6 points
Learner done for Due Care, £400 & 6 points
Author
Discussion

s2art

Original Poster:

18,942 posts

273 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
Whats all this about? Apparently a learner on his fifth lesson lost control, caused a crash. Rear tyre under-pressured may have contributed.
May be more to this, but why was he prosecuted for due care & attention? Isnt the instructer partly responsible?

OTOH if numpty-like incompetance will be punished in future, then OK.

sidekick

266 posts

271 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
Unfortunately the instructor was killed (apparently instantly) in the crash.

Spoonman

1,085 posts

281 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
Has anyone got a link for this?

The result of the learner's actions should have no consequence on whether or not he was prosecuted, regardless of who was killed or injured.

mrs fish

30,018 posts

278 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
I heard this on the radio on the way home from work, I was going to post it but couldn't remember the full facts and as of yet have not come across the story.

mrs fish

30,018 posts

278 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
Here we go

bbc said:
An 18-year-old learner driver has admitted driving without due care and attention after an accident in Lincolnshire killed his driving instructor.
David Readman of Beckingham, Nottinghamshire was fined £400 and £55 in costs at Gainsborough Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.

The learner driver was having only his fifth driving lesson with BSM instructor 50-year-old Jeffrey Ward when the accident happened.

They were driving along the A631 at Corringham, near Gainsborough in January this year when the Vauxhall Corsa he was driving veered on to the wrong side of the road and hit a mini bus carrying children with special needs.

Mr Ward from Westwoodside, near Doncaster, in South Yorkshire died at the scene. Several of the children and one of the carers were injured.

Accident investigators said a rear tyre was only partially inflated and this may have made the car more difficult to control.

Mr Readman's solicitor said he felt deep remorse after the accident.

alans

3,615 posts

276 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
Don't they have dual controls? (not steering obviously) bloody harsh on the learner IMHO.

michaels

2,919 posts

269 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
I had my fifth driving lesson today and my instructor was a little worried. I dont know why I keep to the NSL on every road!

Mike

>> Edited by michaels on Wednesday 20th August 13:57

gh0st

4,693 posts

278 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all

bbc said:

Mr Readman's solicitor said he felt deep remorse after the accident.




Nice for a solicitor to be remorseful!!

206xsi

49,317 posts

268 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
AFAIK instructors get the same penalty as learners (if they live )

wedg1e'sdaughter

4,045 posts

271 months

Tuesday 19th August 2003
quotequote all
michaels said:
I had my fifth driving lesson today and my instructor was a little worried. I dont know why I keep to the NSL on every road!

Mike


when you do that in a 30 he has a right to worry :P

JMGS4

8,867 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
The instructor is legally in charge of the vehicle and therefore the one who MUST by law be prosecuted, not the learner driver!!! What the F is up with Britains legal system nowadays?? Instructor killed , so get your money from someone who is NOT LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE?? how callous can you get????

Don

28,378 posts

304 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
The instructor is legally in charge of the vehicle and therefore the one who MUST by law be prosecuted, not the learner driver!!! What the F is up with Britains legal system nowadays?? Instructor killed , so get your money from someone who is NOT LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE?? how callous can you get????


I'm not sure that's quite right. I thought that the driver - even under instruction - was responsible for the vehicle. I'm off to look this up....I'll report back...

MR2Mike

20,143 posts

275 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
So why did the learner plead guilty then? I suspect (as is nearly always the case) that there is more to this than appears in the story above.

Dual control or not, if a learner decides to do something stupid like veering into oncomming traffic at NSL, the instructor isn't realisticly going to have time to react.

JMGS4

8,867 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
Don said:



JMGS4 said:
The instructor is legally in charge of the vehicle and therefore the one who MUST by law be prosecuted, not the learner driver!!! What the F is up with Britains legal system nowadays?? Instructor killed , so get your money from someone who is NOT LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE?? how callous can you get????



I'm not sure that's quite right. I thought that the driver - even under instruction - was responsible for the vehicle. I'm off to look this up....I'll report back...



Thanks, as I last instructed in the UK 30 years ago and it definitely was this way... mind you these legalistic scumbag labourites will change anything to steal more money!!!

Editted coz i iz fikk , and didn't put the answer in the right place!

Any of our friendly PH BiBs comment on this please?



>> Edited by JMGS4 on Wednesday 20th August 08:53

docevi1

10,430 posts

268 months

docevi1

10,430 posts

268 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
[quote]
Accident investigators said a rear tyre was only partially inflated and this may have made the car more difficult to control.
[/quote]

Surely then thats the driver instructors fault? I feel sorry for the kid, not so much the fine or the points (tho that is harsh) but I doubt he'll be able to drive for a very long time. I know it took me about a week before I could drive normally after a relatively small accident on a roundabout (someone hit me). I'm still slightly nervous now (nearly a year on).

Stefan

lucozade

2,574 posts

299 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
Hard luck to the learner. I'm not convinced that endorsing 6 points on his license will help at all. I think he/she has been harshly done by.

206xsi

49,317 posts

268 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
Obviously they measured his skid marks and found him to be 1mph over the limit - seems like a fair punishment now!

Spoonman

1,085 posts

281 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
This is truly insane.

"Police said that in earlier interviews he had said he thought the crash was his fault."

Are they too dumb to put themselves into the position of the learner? Being behind the wheel of a car in which someone died, I reckon there's a fair chance of feeling guilty about it no matter what happened. Especially if you're a poor young lad with no experience.

This makes me so angry. It's purely, yet again, another case of the CPS pursuing a safe conviction because they're too damn lazy to do real work. I hope they feel very satisfied in their smug little worlds.

It seems this was nothing more than an accident. If no one had been hurt, would the learner have been prosecuted? Somehow, I doubt it.

CarZee

13,382 posts

287 months

Wednesday 20th August 2003
quotequote all
Spoonman said:
I hope they feel very satisfied in their smug little worlds.
Rest assured they do - you'd be better off wishing a pox upon them.