3rd party insurance question
3rd party insurance question
Author
Discussion

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

283 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
My friend has an old Land Rover on his trader's policy which we use for green laning. I can legally drive it with 3rd party cover from my own car's comprehensive policy.

What I'm wondering is if I borrow the Landie for a while does the insurance somehow become invalid? Would the insurers or plod be able to say it was my car despite it being owned someone else?

I'm not worried about theft cover as live in a safe area and it's only worth a few hundred quid.

Thanks

wanty1974

3,704 posts

268 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
AFAIK it just comes down to permission, if you are borrowing the LR for a while, it might be worth getting written permission from the owner. I've checked my previous three insurance T&Cs (with different providers) and the 3rd party element on comprehensive doesn't appear to have a time limit.

docevi1

10,430 posts

268 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
I know someone who bought a new Aston a few years back and couldn't/didn't want to afford the insurance so he put it on fire & theft, bought a knackered fiesta and stored it. Then insured the Fiesta Fully Comp and drove the Aston.

Stefan

loaf

850 posts

281 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
Technically as long as you have the permission of the owner you're OK as long as you don't leave the vehicle unattended on a public road or road to which the public has access.

The only thing his insurer might not be too chuffed about is the fact that you are keeping the vehicle on a long-term basis, and therefore the registered keeper on the policy/V5 doesn't match with the actual keeper i.e. you; your insurer might not be too chuffed about you driving any wagon on your policy long-term (as the DoC provision is intended to provide for emergencies rather than an ongoing solution) and if they find out they may take it off you at renewal (which they are perfectly entitled to do) and no, you won't get a discount for not having that facility Only if they find out, mind

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

275 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
docevi1 said:
I know someone who bought a new Aston a few years back and couldn't/didn't want to afford the insurance so he put it on fire & theft, bought a knackered fiesta and stored it. Then insured the Fiesta Fully Comp and drove the Aston.

Stefan


Then as the owner of the Aston he was not insured. Even if the Aston had belonged to "someone else", he would have only been covered third party whilst driving it. While it was parked up the car would be uninsured. It also makes getting road tax a little tricky.

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

283 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
loaf said:
...as you don't leave the vehicle unattended on a public road or road to which the public has access.


Does this mean I can't park it in the street at all? I have a driveway so it's not a huge problem but I'm not sure I follow this part.

Thanks for all the comments

loaf

850 posts

281 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all

thanuk said:

Does this mean I can't park it in the street at all? I have a driveway so it's not a huge problem but I'm not sure I follow this part.


It means exactly that. If you leave the vehicle on a public road having driven it there then you are the person 'using' that vehicle until such time as someone else drives it. Thus there needs to be in force a policy of insurance relating to your use of that particular vehicle (s143(1)(a)Road Traffic Act 1988); as your policy only covers you whilst driving the vehicle, not using it, it is uninsured and you are committing an offence. Also, if the guy who owns the vehicle knows that you are driving it on DoC and leaving it on a public road, AIUI he is committing the offence of permitting you to use a vehicle while uninsured against third party risks in contravention of s143(1)(b) RTA 1988. Both offences carry 6-8 points and a means tested fine.

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

283 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
loaf said:
It means exactly that


Ouch - even filling it up and going into the shop to pay would technically be an offence then. Perhaps I'd better find out about getting my own insurance policy on it then...

icamm

2,153 posts

280 months

Thursday 28th August 2003
quotequote all
Just to clarify loafs post abit. If the vehicle is covered by a specific policy it can be left on the road. No matter who drove it last. If the vehicle is not covered then the last person to drive it (and possibly the owner) is committing an offence.

If your friends traders policy allows it to be parked on the road then you should be covered. Although I would check the small print. The last thing you need is to get done for this.

PS: his trader policy might also require the use of "trade plates"

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

283 months

Friday 29th August 2003
quotequote all
icamm said:
Just to clarify loafs post abit


Thanks, that makes more sense. Yes, his policy covers any vehicle he owns for 3rd party, fire & theft so it should be OK to park it on the road. I'll check the small print though...

loaf

850 posts

281 months

Friday 29th August 2003
quotequote all
I have done a bit more research on this (went and had a chat with a claims manager ) and it turns out that when you drive someone else's car on your own policy you CAN leave it on a public road, as your policy is still technically in force as you were the last user. Natch, no damage to, theft of or from the vehicle will be covered.

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

283 months

Sunday 31st August 2003
quotequote all
loaf said:
I have done a bit more research on this


That's helpful beyond the call of duty - cheers loaf

loaf

850 posts

281 months

Tuesday 2nd September 2003
quotequote all
thanuk said:

loaf said:
I have done a bit more research on this



That's helpful beyond the call of duty - cheers loaf


You're most welcome