Yorkshire Constabulary Camera Van...Grrr..!!
Yorkshire Constabulary Camera Van...Grrr..!!
Author
Discussion

M@H

Original Poster:

11,298 posts

293 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
...why are they painted BLACK !! ..with the solitary temporary Scamera Sign obscured AFTER the bloody VAN so you cant see it as you approach!!


dazren

22,612 posts

282 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
Safety?

count duckula

1,324 posts

295 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
Easy - harder to spot.


Malc

alans

3,629 posts

277 months

Monday 22nd December 2003
quotequote all
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg

M@H

Original Poster:

11,298 posts

293 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
alans said:
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg

True enough...

...afterall we were doing a highly illegal and potentially fatal 35mph on a wide A Road just before it enters a 60 limit...

T()ssers !

markmark

18 posts

265 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
Might be able to help here - as I work for W Yorks - go onto the West Yorks Police site and they post a week in advance where they will plot up. W Yorks don't use any black vehicles at all

M@H

Original Poster:

11,298 posts

293 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
markmark said:
Might be able to help here - as I work for W Yorks - go onto the West Yorks Police site and they post a week in advance where they will plot up. W Yorks don't use any black vehicles at all

Sadly it was N. Yorks...

their website includes this gem of nonsense

n.yorks police said:

Excess and inappropriate speed contributes to over one third of all road casualties. It is crucial that we address this issue to improve road safety. Research has shown that reducing average by 1 MPH leads to a 5% reduction in collisions overall and in the vicinity of junctions can lead to a 17% reduction. North Yorkshire Road Policing Officers actively target speed offenders at locations and routes throughout the county that have a proven collision / speed record. Our speed enforcement is directed at maximum road casualty reduction.

gh0st

4,693 posts

279 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2003
quotequote all
M@H said:

alans said:
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg


True enough...

...afterall we were doing a highly illegal and potentially fatal 35mph on a wide A Road just before it enters a 60 limit...

T()ssers !



YOU WERE DOING WHAT SPEED?!? DONT YOU KNOW THAT IF YOU DO 35 IN A 30 YOU INSTANTLY KILL 99% OF ALL BRITISH CHILDREN????

M@H

Original Poster:

11,298 posts

293 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
Sadly the NIP arrived today.... arse ! !

38 in a 30 from Humberside Police.

well the 38 seems unlikely.. more like 35 I reckon, however no point in arguing on that one...


Can someone though please tell me the Signing regulations for speed traps, as this one was set up with the Black Van before the solitary Temporary Speed Trap sign, not after it.. accordingly, the first thing we saw was the <b> Black </b>van after it was too late, rather than a Speed Trap Sign..

..any mileage in persuing this angle..?

Cheers
Matt

>> Edited by M@H on Tuesday 30th December 09:19

sloop

5 posts

267 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
name said:
any mileage in persuing this angle..?


Sadly, no. They completely disregard the guidelines and act "in the wild." Play the buggers at their own game and do like I intend - install a laser jammer.

alans

3,629 posts

277 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
sloop said:

install a laser jammer.

That will be the garage door opener next on my "to do" list

forever_driving

1,869 posts

271 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
alans said:

sloop said:

install a laser jammer.


That will be the garage door opener next on my "to do" list


Remember, if you get stopped with a Jammer (oh sorry, 'garage door opener') you have to prove that you had an honest reason to have it installed on the car.

bluementhol

111 posts

265 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
That'll be the original Humberside van then.

It used to have no markings on it at all. You used to have to look out for a black van with the back window open. Due to complaints they painted POLICE down the side in small white letters (very useful).


When they joined the goverment's cash collection scheme they painted the back door orange.


The other newer vans are white. I've never seen them anywhere that isn't posted on the website.

www.humbersidesafetycameras.com/pdf/Safety%20camera%20panels.pdf

Steve-B

894 posts

303 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
the BiB who beat the rap a month or two successfully beat it due to the signage being illegal.

i bet a search of the archives may prove helpful!!

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

269 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
Steve-B said:
the BiB who beat the rap a month or two successfully beat it due to the signage being illegal.

The speed limit signs themselves were illegal; the presence or otherwise of camera warning signs has no effect on the legal position (unless they were illegally incorporated into the speed limit signs as happened in the above case).

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

292 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
just don't sign the nip. Say you can't recall who was driving, you or your partner. They can't do squat without a photo that clearly shows. You will end up on the "hit list" though. eg, any ANPR vans and you will likely be stopped up the road. HOw do I know these things? not saying. Yet.

gavmitchell

104 posts

278 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
gh0st said:

M@H said:


alans said:
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg



True enough...

...afterall we were doing a highly illegal and potentially fatal 35mph on a wide A Road just before it enters a 60 limit...

T()ssers !




YOU WERE DOING WHAT SPEED?!? DONT YOU KNOW THAT IF YOU DO 35 IN A 30 YOU INSTANTLY KILL 99% OF ALL BRITISH CHILDREN????


Why should children be on the road, they are for vehicles. Doesn't anyone think to teach them to cross when cars aren't coming any more?

gopher

5,160 posts

280 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
gavmitchell said:

gh0st said:


M@H said:



alans said:
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg




True enough...

...afterall we were doing a highly illegal and potentially fatal 35mph on a wide A Road just before it enters a 60 limit...

T()ssers !





YOU WERE DOING WHAT SPEED?!? DONT YOU KNOW THAT IF YOU DO 35 IN A 30 YOU INSTANTLY KILL 99% OF ALL BRITISH CHILDREN????



Why should children be on the road, they are for vehicles. Doesn't anyone think to teach them to cross when cars aren't coming any more?


Gavin

Either I missed the smilie or you missed the sarcasm

cheers

Paul

FunkyNige

9,669 posts

296 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
M@H said:

alans said:
Simple, Kerchinggggggggg


True enough...

...afterall we were doing a highly illegal and potentially fatal 35mph on a wide A Road just before it enters a 60 limit...

T()ssers !



What? If we do 1,000,000 mph then we could everyone, if we did 0mph we could killno-one. Therefore more speed = more deaths, what's the problem?

S'pose I'd better add some smilies for sarcasm...

gopher

5,160 posts

280 months

Tuesday 30th December 2003
quotequote all
Nige

Have you had a bad day?