Speed trap caught man 10 times in six weeks
Speed trap caught man 10 times in six weeks
Author
Discussion

cazzo

Original Poster:

15,673 posts

288 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2004%2F01%2F10%2Fnspeed10.xml

Speed trap caught man 10 times in six weeks
By Richard Savill
(Filed: 10/01/2004)


A businessman was banned from driving for a year yesterday after being caught speeding by the same camera 10 times in a six-week period.

Robert Chamberlain, 56, a garage owner, was also fined £900 and given 32 penalty points on his licence, after his Jaguar was caught doing speeds of between 40 and 43mph in a 30mph zone in Exeter, Devon. Exeter magistrates were told that he received nine summonses through the post on the same morning.

Chamberlain, of Clyst St George, near Exeter, admitted nine speeding offences in July and August last year.

He also picked up a fixed penalty ticket in a different car during the same period, which he had paid.

Robert Jacobs, defending, said Chamberlain ran garages that were positioned in such a way that he had to drive past the camera six or seven times a day.

"He received nine summonses for the nine offences on the same day. In the normal course of events he would have received one earlier and that would have given him a warning and a chance to change his behaviour."

dazren

22,612 posts

282 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Anyone got more details on this. I'd be fascinated to know if the trap was of the hidden trained monkey up a tree variety or a fixed gatso location.

DAZ

Davel

8,982 posts

279 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
That's just careless!

streaky

19,311 posts

270 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
dazren said:
Anyone got more details on this. I'd be fascinated to know if the trap was of the hidden trained monkey up a tree variety or a fixed gatso location.

DAZ

The defence statement that, "he had to drive past the camera six or seven times a day" is suggestive of a fixed camera - Streaky

>> Edited by streaky on Monday 12th January 15:34

skittle

312 posts

282 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
The thing I find most interesting is that he was caught at roughly the same speed each time suggesting that he may well have been tailoring his speed to the conditions of the road, i.e approximatley 40mph was safe on this stretch of road.

pdV6

16,442 posts

282 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Again, if it was a trafpol who'd ticketed him, he'd have "learnt his lesson" (*) the first time and would never hae generated the extra 9 lots of revenue.

Who says its not about the money?

(*) the lesson being: be more careful on this stretch of road

{edited for dodgy spelling}

>> Edited by pdV6 on Monday 12th January 16:05

knowley

145 posts

299 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Wouldn't you see the flashes? LOL

dazren

22,612 posts

282 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
knowley said:
Wouldn't you see the flashes? LOL

Not if the camera doesn't emit flashes, as in the laser video camera systems used by the scamera partnership mobile traps.

DAZ

knowley

145 posts

299 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
ahh thanks, TBH I haven't seen tooo many of those around...never knew if they flashed or not.

puggit

49,397 posts

269 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
He must have killed at least 50 kids!

nighthawkEP3

1,757 posts

265 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Blimey :yikes;

By Dicky B's critriea he'll be sharing a cell with shipman, while everyone who works for him and his family become social outcasts for being criminals.

streaky

19,311 posts

270 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
nighthawkEP3 said:
Blimey :yikes;

By Dicky B's critriea he'll be sharing a cell with shipman, while everyone who works for him and his family become social outcasts for being criminals.
Also takes drugs and steals office stationary ... oh, no, he owns the company ... drat! - Streaky

tigertone2000

13 posts

275 months

Thursday 15th January 2004
quotequote all
According to the local rag, the camera in question is a fixed one. I know where it is is - been there for ages, not hidden or anything. Since the guy's local, there's really no excuse in my opinion (and I hate the damn things)and it sounds like he's really not very observant at all...
According to the report, local plod said his personalised plate might have delayed finding his address details and contrbuted to all the letters arriving on the same day!

kevinday

13,614 posts

301 months

Thursday 15th January 2004
quotequote all
tigertone2000 said:
According to the report, local plod said his personalised plate might have delayed finding his address details and contrbuted to all the letters arriving on the same day!


Well thats a load of bs isn't it, the DVLC has a record of whatever your registration number is, it does not matter if it is a personalised plate or not. The report also said he triggered it 9 times on one day.

IMHO he deserves a big fine for being unobservant and probably needs some training in awareness but not a ban.

tonyrec

3,984 posts

276 months

Thursday 15th January 2004
quotequote all
If anyone gets done twice by the same camera then they are 'kin idiots.

How the hell can you get caught 10 times......should have been reported for Without Due Care as well.
(Not for his driving but for NOT seeing the trap)

superlightr

12,920 posts

284 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
consistant.

Rob P

5,803 posts

285 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
superlightr said:
consistant.


consistantly unobservant IMO

stewy68

1,826 posts

264 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
tonyrec said:
If anyone gets done twice by the same camera then they are 'kin idiots.

How the hell can you get caught 10 times......should have been reported for Without Due Care as well.
(Not for his driving but for NOT seeing the trap)


I agree mate.

Stew...

CB-Dave

1,002 posts

281 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
Hidden talivan maybe?

We all know they don't subscribe to hi-vis rules don't we... (I for one - I currently have SP30 written on my licence because of it)

streaky

19,311 posts

270 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
CB-Dave said:
Hidden talivan maybe?

I refer you to the reply tigertone2000 gave earlier - Streaky

>> Edited by streaky on Friday 16th January 06:25