S172 (4) - Unsure of driver
Discussion
Interesting recent case law on this, Mohindra v DPP.
I'm almost sorry that I'm not up for this soon.
Me: I dunno who was driving.
Mag: What have you done to try and ascertain who the driver was?
Me: Sod all,'cos this judgement says I don't have to because the prosecution have produced no evidence that I'm the keeper.
Don't see them letting the law get in the way of a conviction though, however, we await with interest.
I'm almost sorry that I'm not up for this soon.
Me: I dunno who was driving.
Mag: What have you done to try and ascertain who the driver was?
Me: Sod all,'cos this judgement says I don't have to because the prosecution have produced no evidence that I'm the keeper.
Don't see them letting the law get in the way of a conviction though, however, we await with interest.
Hi Jeffrey,
Once my brain gets through a couple of "appendix this", and "subsection that" bollocks it shuts down. What does it mean?
I take it you're in the legal profession ? I have the highest respect for anybody who can speak fluent bollocks, in fact "instructing" (unusual use of the word !) one of your colleagues at the moment.
Philthy
Once my brain gets through a couple of "appendix this", and "subsection that" bollocks it shuts down. What does it mean?
I take it you're in the legal profession ? I have the highest respect for anybody who can speak fluent bollocks, in fact "instructing" (unusual use of the word !) one of your colleagues at the moment.
Philthy
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff