Cycle wings V Clamshells

Cycle wings V Clamshells

Author
Discussion

studog

Original Poster:

268 posts

258 months

Thursday 5th August 2004
quotequote all
Following the thread about aeroscreens.

Does anyone know what the cost in performance is for running clamshell front wings over cycle ones?

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th August 2004
quotequote all
to be honest - I don't think they make the car that much slower, but I can tell you that clamshells make the car far more pointy at speed - the steering feels superdirect and it takes a lot of getting used to. This must be down to the volume of air that gets traped under them.

I personally don't like them because of that....oh alright then, the real reason I don't like them is 'cos I can't watch the suspension going up and down as I'm driving along

Eric Mc

122,165 posts

266 months

Saturday 7th August 2004
quotequote all
Unless you're in a 200 bhp plus Seven, I don't think the style of front mudguard makes much difference. The aerodynamics of a Seven are pretty apalling no matter what covers the front wheels.

Flares are virtually unobtainable from Caterham now on new cars in any case - they've completely fallen out of fashion. I'm sure it's because all the current Caterham racing series use cycle mudguards.