Dedion tube
Author
Discussion

analog_me

Original Poster:

287 posts

149 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
Hi all,

Why do people replaced the dedion tube.
This is a 4inch in diameter tube, this is quite a solid stuff. What might go wrong with it?
In case you hit a pavement or something with your back end then other things will be damaged first including the chassis no?
thanks

carmaddave

35 posts

217 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
The tube has evolved over time, my tube on a 1996 car started to tear along the welds where the shocks attach. The new tube is much thicker and the attachment points for the shocks are much more robust.

F355GTS

3,825 posts

275 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
The end of mine detached at Camp at Castle Combe eek

analog_me

Original Poster:

287 posts

149 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
Ok

These are prone to structural failure around the welds so need frequent checking
thanks

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

233 months

Friday 9th June 2017
quotequote all
My 1999 original started to test at the shocks also. New one has been beefed up.

dave7

21 posts

295 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
Another one here, car was built in 1999, and 4-5 years old when it failed.

Canuck7

64 posts

149 months

Sunday 11th June 2017
quotequote all
I had a 1991 car. I replaced the dedion tube with a new one about 2 yrs ago.

Despite the bar being a fairly small unit, the difference in weight was, if my memory serves, 8 lbs. That's a whole lot more steel in that small tube, and attests to how minimal the early dedion's were.

Many people have gone backwards through a hedge due to failures. I don't recall when the new heavier tubes became standard. There are a few other design changes over the years; going from central shock mount holes to lower welded on shock mount holes (gives more oil volume/shim stack in the shock and longer springs - or something like that - for better performance), to wider or narrower central dedion mount for the A-Frame, etc. Ones for a few years now, have been heavy and strong and full-featured.

So if a person has a newer car, it isn't an issue unless they want to change the type of rear shock they have - though my new tube has both mid and lower shock mounts on it - others may be more specific from the factory, I am not sure.

The only other thing I can think of, is clipping the a-frame mounting triangle on something, and perhaps wanting to replace it, as a reason for a new dedion tube on a newer car.

JB052

156 posts

242 months

Sunday 11th June 2017
quotequote all
Replaced the one on my 1992 car a couple of years ago the old one had fractured badly in two places. Quite difficult to see the problem as when you jack the car up the cracks close up.

unclefester

84 posts

228 months

Sunday 11th June 2017
quotequote all
I've heard of a 2002 SV, on 26,000 miles when the deDion let go when a weld failed, quite nasty results though no injuries.

The later SV units seem to be fine.

Smitters

4,230 posts

177 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
Yeah - googling dedion tube failure Caterham is sobering. PT Sports Cars run a lot of racecars and consider them a lifed item, cars often going through multiple tubes per season. I would not assume yours is a strong and solid object...

ETA - pic=1000 words etc. Vintage '96 after 20 years of cack being thrown at it. Was not given a lick of paint and a clean bill of health...



Edited by Smitters on Tuesday 13th June 14:48

Helluvaname

365 posts

227 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
It's OK, Caterham reported it to VOSA and say it only affects 38 race cars redface
http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/apps/recalls/searches/e...

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

233 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
Helluvaname said:
It's OK, Caterham reported it to VOSA and say it only affects 38 race cars redface
http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/apps/recalls/searches/e...
What a con!! Can that be updated via new information?

Smitters

4,230 posts

177 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
That'll be the new Academy cars sold that year only I would think. Caterham wouldn't necessarily know if you bought a car and then converted it to a race-car, and presumably no failures, or not enough to prompt a recall, were recorded on the road cars. Regardless, it's a known issue.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

155 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
Hmm. how does one figure out if you have a tube you should be worried about or not (given mine is an 06?)

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

233 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
06 should be fine. I believe it was the earlier 90's tubes with the weakness. The suspension take off points are gusseted a lot more now than before. The steels thicker.

Sure someone will have pics.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

155 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
That was what I thought until I saw the recall was for 06 cars confused

Smitters

4,230 posts

177 months

Thursday 15th June 2017
quotequote all
The race cars are clattering kerbs, so they broke them, hence why PT say they're a lifed item. I do trackdays, but try and preserve the car, so I don't kerb hop for the last tenths...

If in doubt, get under and have a look. They broke/degraded on the welds, central and on the tabs for the damper.

upsidedownmark

2,120 posts

155 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Cheers.. just good to know what to look out for.

Helluvaname

365 posts

227 months

Tuesday 27th June 2017
quotequote all
Smitters said:
The race cars are clattering kerbs, so they broke them, hence why PT say they're a lifed item. I do trackdays, but try and preserve the car, so I don't kerb hop for the last tenths...

If in doubt, get under and have a look. They broke/degraded on the welds, central and on the tabs for the damper.
The majority of failures I am aware of are on road cars.
Roads are considerably more rough and pot-holed than circuits, and the generally higher mileages in road cars can cause more damage IMO.