RE: Caterham Superlight R500

RE: Caterham Superlight R500

Thursday 8th April 2004

Caterham Superlight R500

Can Caterham get any more extreme!?


They've been quiet for a while but now Caterham have played another high card with the new Caterham Superlight R500.

Weighing just 470 kg, the lightweight Seven packs a monstrous 530bhp per tonne punch from the specially bored 1998cc K Series engine. Impressive figures but the real clout comes from the 190lb ft of torque that kicks in at less than 4,000 revs flinging you up the road at a truly indecent pace.

The minimalist cabin is dressed with lightweight carbon-fibre trim, carbon-kevlar race seats and the classic Superlight Stack speedometer. New lightweight 13-inch eight-spoke wheels shod with Avon CR500 tyres help convert the raw power into road performance, whilst the AP Racing brakes have been fine-tuned at endurance events at Nurburgring and in the USA.

Fully adjustable dampers allow those buying the R500 evolution for track day fun to fiddle to their heart's content and bore fellow track day goers with riveting tales of suspension set up.

On sale from end of April, the Superlight R500 evolution is priced at an eye watering £42,000!

Engine 4 cylinder 1998cc MG Rover K Series, prepared by Minister Racing Engines

Power: 250bhp at 8000rpm

Torque: 190lb ft at 4000rpm

Power to Weight: 530bhp per tonne

Top Speed: 150mph

0-60mph: 3.2secs

Weight: 470kg

Mpg: Who cares?

Mpg: Who cares?

Links

Author
Discussion

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,008 posts

260 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
This is it.
S2000 would do the trick . . . 240/208 iso 250/190 But impressive . . . and a looker. Bit strange tires. Want one in lemon yellow.

www.ukintpress.com/engineoftheyear/18-2.html

>>> Edited by dinkel on Thursday 8th April 11:41

chassis

300 posts

268 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
Why not put new engine in instead of drilling old rover engine?
Not exciting at all much.

granville

18,764 posts

263 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all

murcielago

952 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all


Talk about mixed emotions.

I love that car

Edited to say: Rover Engine? (should have read it before)

>> Edited by murcielago on Thursday 8th April 10:40

glenn wheeler

17 posts

242 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
I agree, the K series engine is probably at the end of its development, the new fords are a much better option and this would take the seven back to a more traditional basis. Every time I look under the bonnet of a K seven (whatever state of tune) I think "Hairdryer motor"

rubystone

11,254 posts

261 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
Strnge tyres are ACB10s - demon in the dry - less so (!) in the wet.

I guess Caterham are sticking to their knitting with the K (and enjoying a good deal with MG Rover). Plus they're probably watching what the likes of Raceline & Minister are doing with the Duratech.

Don't knock a K until you've driven a Caterham powered by one (especially if it's a VHPD or above)

z_chromozone

1,436 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
I thought that most people went for the K series because of the power to weight. How much does the ford one weigh.

Z

buster

1,060 posts

286 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
LOVE that - just need the pennies to purchase it now.

Must organise a drive...

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

264 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
£42,000

Hmm someone on the Sylva list has a Fury with a cossie engine running green injectors etc....

Don't think it cost £42,000 though.....

Mojo.

rubystone

11,254 posts

261 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
....but it isn't a Caterham is it?

...not all about power y'know

The Duratech is a slightly heavier engine - Dino Ferrano will be along with the figures soon...

white_van_man

3,846 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
i want one that looks amazing will be interested to see yhe performance stats

ben1978

15 posts

268 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
Sounds amazing pity it will not be allowed to race at the nurburgring as the article states. Caterhams have been banned from racing at the ring in the 24hr and in the VLN series!

Teppic

7,409 posts

259 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all

smele

1,284 posts

286 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
Performance looks fantastic. Not so sure about the price.

Think I might be tempted to buy a Tuscan rather than spend 42K on Caterham.

Dinkel

Original Poster:

27,008 posts

260 months

Thursday 8th April 2004
quotequote all
smele said:
Performance looks fantastic. Not so sure about the price.

Think I might be tempted to buy a Tuscan rather than spend 42K on Caterham.


A Tusc costs the same!?!?!?
I take the big T Speed 6 for a second longer to 60 . . .

Sounds better too I guess . . .

BogBeast

1,137 posts

265 months

Friday 9th April 2004
quotequote all
£42,000

They have to be kidding. Give me DAX Rush & a cosworth lump. Even my stg1 gave me 270 brake..

Dave Tripp

17 posts

280 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
Back in the early 70's, I was in Atlanta, and one of the boys who worked for Jimmy Downing (Mazda Kudzu, HANS-device, etc) gave me a ride in his Lotus 7 Series 4. The original owner managed to get it into the Chattahoochee River; the boys pulled it out and replaced the Lotus engine with one of Jimmy's old Mazda rotaries. Given dinkel's comment below about that sweet Honda engine, and the link to the international engine awards, it is interesting that the Renesis was the overall winner last year. Now THAT would be a tool and a half...

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,008 posts

260 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
Dave Tripp said:
Back in the early 70's, I was in Atlanta, and one of the boys who worked for Jimmy Downing (Mazda Kudzu, HANS-device, etc) gave me a ride in his Lotus 7 Series 4. The original owner managed to get it into the Chattahoochee River; the boys pulled it out and replaced the Lotus engine with one of Jimmy's old Mazda rotaries. Given dinkel's comment below about that sweet Honda engine, and the link to the international engine awards, it is interesting that the Renesis was the overall winner last year. Now THAT would be a tool and a half...


So RX8 Wankel in a Catherham: must be room enough! and a good idea I did not came across yet.

murph7355

37,868 posts

258 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
There was a Wankel engined 7 for sale on Blatchat a while ago at a very good price. Can't recall who owned it, but worth a look. Makes a lot of sense, but there must be hassles and drawbakc or everyone would do it.

The 42k price tag for the R500 Evo (why could they not come up with a less "done already" name?) is too steep, IMO, but some people will stump up - not many I guess, but some just want the absolute top model that a factory produces, and this happens to be it for Caterham.

Also note that you are not simply losing 1 sec to 60 in going from a 7 to a Tuscan. You're losing handfuls of time around a lap of any circuit you care to mention, and the absolute shame of being lapped on many too if you stay out for more than a few laps The Caterham is simply one of the quickest road usable tools out there (still, after over 40yrs).

And a K series on throttle bodies at 8500 revs sounds brilliant, so I'm not 100% convinced that the Tuscan wins here either.

A more interesting bet is the SV with a bike V8 in it (two bike 4's glued together). Not a Caterham product, but I believe the engine is around the same weight as a K, and produces 320bhp!

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,008 posts

260 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
murph7355 said:
( . . . )

Also note that you are not simply losing 1 sec to 60 in going from a 7 to a Tuscan. You're losing handfuls of time around a lap of any circuit you care to mention, and the absolute shame of being lapped on many too if you stay out for more than a few laps The Caterham is simply one of the quickest road usable tools out there (still, after over 40yrs). ( . . . )


. . . and you catch a cold in the 7 for sure!