Discussion
No idea how its works, but very clever stuff. Would be interested to hear how too.
Edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stabilization
Edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stabilization
I think the theory is IS / VR hunts to determine whether image can be sharper; not sure that's how it works though. I believe it takes input from motion sensors ('G' transducers) and shifts a lens element/group accordingly.
There is also a camp that turns it off when used in conjunction with studio flash - i've tried both and i'm not convinced.
There is also a camp that turns it off when used in conjunction with studio flash - i've tried both and i'm not convinced.
Simpo Two said:
Back to basics... what is IS/VR for? IS/VR helps to mitigate the effects of camera movement. If you put the camera on a tripod it shouldn't move. Therefore IS/VR is redundant.
It's redundant, yes, but should it be disabled is the question. There's a difference between something being activated, but having no effect on the results, and something being activated and working against you.This is quite a reasonable review and confirms my thoughts
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/image-stabilizatio...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/image-stabilizatio...
dr_gn said:
It's redundant, yes, but should it be disabled is the question. There's a difference between something being activated, but having no effect on the results, and something being activated and working against you.
I would say that if it cannot improve the result, but possibly do it harm, turn it off.Simpo Two said:
dr_gn said:
It's redundant, yes, but should it be disabled is the question. There's a difference between something being activated, but having no effect on the results, and something being activated and working against you.
I would say that if it cannot improve the result, but possibly do it harm, turn it off.I wonder if it's a process that constantly 'adds' vibration then subtracts the same amount (to reduce inertial effects) plus whatever real time shake that's been detected . Sort of like a moving version of an unsharp mask...but then again not really

Bah. I'll just turn it off in future.
ian in lancs said:
This is quite a reasonable review and confirms my thoughts
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/image-stabilizatio...
I thought that with Ken Rockwell, he turns his IS off and the rest of the world adjusts itself to compensate for any camera shake. (Thought we hadn't had a Rockwellism for a while ...)http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/image-stabilizatio...
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



