Some of my recent work as a 2nd photographer at a wedding
Discussion
Being a bit critical I know but it looks like someone else set these up, shot what they needed, and you've had a go too. For that reason they all show some promise, but none quite hit the mark for me. I'm not saying they're bad, in fact they're all well exposed, it's only the crop in shot 8 that stands out as being below par.
1 works. I don't love it, but it's a decent enough image.
2 doesn't work. There's eyes shut, and there's mid-blink - this shot looks like mid-blink.
3 doesn't work. What's the subject? There isn't one! It's probably made worse by your B&W conversion as it loses the impact of colour and the potential separation of one head to another.
4 and 5 work.
6 is ok but I'd rather have seen the bride in focus not the groom. I like the concept of having the person in the background OOF (it can work very well) but because the bride's face is the dominant part of the image your eye goes to that, then realises it's blurred, so looks for the second subject, and this angle means there's little to see of the second subject.
7 works.
8 doesn't work. The crop is wrong. If you have the feet in the original, keep them, if you don't, then crop higher. No feet is better than half-feet!
Good effort all in all, and all comments are just MHO of course
1 works. I don't love it, but it's a decent enough image.
2 doesn't work. There's eyes shut, and there's mid-blink - this shot looks like mid-blink.
3 doesn't work. What's the subject? There isn't one! It's probably made worse by your B&W conversion as it loses the impact of colour and the potential separation of one head to another.
4 and 5 work.
6 is ok but I'd rather have seen the bride in focus not the groom. I like the concept of having the person in the background OOF (it can work very well) but because the bride's face is the dominant part of the image your eye goes to that, then realises it's blurred, so looks for the second subject, and this angle means there's little to see of the second subject.
7 works.
8 doesn't work. The crop is wrong. If you have the feet in the original, keep them, if you don't, then crop higher. No feet is better than half-feet!
Good effort all in all, and all comments are just MHO of course

Edited by bramley on Thursday 22 September 21:19
bramley said:
Being a bit critical I know but it looks like someone else set these up, shot what they needed, and you've had a go too. For that reason they all show some promise, but none quite hit the mark for me. I'm not saying they're bad, in fact they're all well exposed, it's only the crop in shot 8 that stands out as being below par.
1 works. I don't love it, but it's a decent enough image.
2 doesn't work. There's eyes shut, and there's mid-blink - this shot looks like mid-blink.
3 doesn't work. What's the subject? There isn't one! It's probably made worse by your B&W conversion as it loses the impact of colour and the potential separation of one head to another.
4 and 5 work.
6 is ok but I'd rather have seen the bride in focus not the groom. I like the concept of having the person in the background OOF (it can work very well) but because the bride's face is the dominant part of the image your eye goes to that, then realises it's blurred, so looks for the second subject, and this angle means there's little to see of the second subject.
7 works.
8 doesn't work. The crop is wrong. If you have the feet in the original, keep them, if you don't, then crop higher. No feet is better than half-feet!
Good effort all in all, and all comments are just MHO of course
Thanks for the feedback mate, and you are right, as a 2nd shooter, my role was the alternative perspectives - and I had to shoot around what the lead was setting up.1 works. I don't love it, but it's a decent enough image.
2 doesn't work. There's eyes shut, and there's mid-blink - this shot looks like mid-blink.
3 doesn't work. What's the subject? There isn't one! It's probably made worse by your B&W conversion as it loses the impact of colour and the potential separation of one head to another.
4 and 5 work.
6 is ok but I'd rather have seen the bride in focus not the groom. I like the concept of having the person in the background OOF (it can work very well) but because the bride's face is the dominant part of the image your eye goes to that, then realises it's blurred, so looks for the second subject, and this angle means there's little to see of the second subject.
7 works.
8 doesn't work. The crop is wrong. If you have the feet in the original, keep them, if you don't, then crop higher. No feet is better than half-feet!
Good effort all in all, and all comments are just MHO of course

Edited by bramley on Thursday 22 September 21:19
The only bits I can add are that for 6, i have the alternative image (bride in focus), I will try to get it uploaded.
As for 8, i will have to go back and check.
Again, thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. For a first attempt, I am still thrilled and know that I at least have decent the control of the camera if not the full composition.
The BW conversions are looking a bit dark and losing the subtle shade separation possible in the 'zones'.
However there is a lot of detail that really starts to come out if you can lighten them up a stop or two and adust from there. You could also try a B&W conversion 'style' that starts off the same way (lightening reds) if your editor offers preset B&W conversion options.
However there is a lot of detail that really starts to come out if you can lighten them up a stop or two and adust from there. You could also try a B&W conversion 'style' that starts off the same way (lightening reds) if your editor offers preset B&W conversion options.
007singh said:
Thanks for the feedback mate, and you are right, as a 2nd shooter, my role was the alternative perspectives - and I had to shoot around what the lead was setting up.
The only bits I can add are that for 6, i have the alternative image (bride in focus), I will try to get it uploaded.
As for 8, i will have to go back and check.
Again, thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. For a first attempt, I am still thrilled and know that I at least have decent the control of the camera if not the full composition.
The only bits I can add are that for 6, i have the alternative image (bride in focus), I will try to get it uploaded.
As for 8, i will have to go back and check.
Again, thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. For a first attempt, I am still thrilled and know that I at least have decent the control of the camera if not the full composition.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff











