Canon 550D - what lens?
Author
Discussion

torres del paine

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

250 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
I've just bought a Canon 550D. I was close to buying a Nikon 5100 but after quite a bit of research, I felt that image quality was better with the Canon, and contrary to what some people say about the Nikon having a more user-friendly interface, I felt that the Canon was better in this regard too. It really is a joy to use; the button layout on the back and the on-screen menus are almost perfectly judged IMO.

Anyway, I want to get a second lens at some point in the not too distant future for landscapes/mountains/urban shots but I'm not sure whether I should go for a Canon 15-85mm lens as a do-it-all lens or go for a more extreme wide angle lens like the Tokina 12-24mm or Canon 10-22mm (superb reviews) to complement the kit lens.

I must say that the Canon 15-85 appeals - it is wide enough for most landscapes and offers a decent amount of zoom for the rest of the time. For 90% of the time it could be the perfect lens.

However, the Tokina is cheaper and probably sharper but could mean that I end up carrying 2 lens with me when travelling and hiking.

Not sure... any photography gurus on here have any experience of using these lenses?







Crafty_

14,090 posts

229 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
I'm assuming you've got the 18-55 kit lens ?

I'd wait a while until you figure out what you like shooting, for example if you end up doing wildlife/sports you may decided on a telephoto.

For general shooting the 15-85 is quite popular I think.

Dogsey

4,301 posts

259 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
For general shooting the 15-85 is quite popular I think.
yes

I love mine and find it a very good walkabout lens, yes it's not very fast and it vingettes rather a lot at the wide end (nothing that's not correctable though) but I rarely want for something wider.

torres del paine

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

250 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
Dogsey said:
yes

I love mine and find it a very good walkabout lens, yes it's not very fast and it vingettes rather a lot at the wide end (nothing that's not correctable though) but I rarely want for something wider.
I'm new to SLRs but that's how I see it. And with the option of cropping images (18 mega pixels) to create panoramas, I am tempted.

If I can find one second hand, I might take the plunge.

On the other hand though, I believe the Tokina is a finer lens and the mark 1 can be had for around £350. Also, it is more flexible than the 11-16mm say with the zoom (relatively speaking) on offer, so it might *just* work as a walkabout lens for landscape/general shooting... hmmm.

I think what I'm trying to say is: for the price, would the 15-85 be too close to the 18-55 in terms of range? Why not just get a more dedicated wide angle lens for less and just swap lenses as and when the mood takes me? I shall play around a bit more with the kit lens and then come to a decision.

Thanks for the replies btw.

Crafty_

14,090 posts

229 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
The 15-85 would replace the kit lens, you'd have no need for it really.

If you want an "as well as" rather than a "instead of" a UWA may be worth looking at.
I think the biggest problem with the Tokina is it only has a 5mm range.. they do a 12-24, canon a 10-22 and sigma a couple of 10-20s, all of which would offer more flexibility.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
As mentioned above, I'd give a little while to see how you get on with your 18-55 kit lens - you may end up wanting something very wide like a 10mm lens, or perhaps something more 'sports and wildlife' like a telezoom.

If you do want another lens then I'd certainly say that the 15-85 will be a replacement for your 18-55, I don't see any reason to keep both... If you are looking at wider lenses then also keep in mind that the Tonika 11-16 is an f2.8 lens, so it's considerably faster than most of the ultra-wides on the market.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
As mentioned above, I'd give a little while to see how you get on with your 18-55 kit lens
This.

If you want something longer get the 55-250.

Killwilly

446 posts

217 months

Monday 10th October 2011
quotequote all
The 55-250 is a great lens for the money. This was taken with mine.




132 by killwilly, on Flickr