Had a bit of grief at Boots.
Had a bit of grief at Boots.
Author
Discussion

wetny

Original Poster:

486 posts

241 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Took a usb stick down to boots to get a years worth of prints done, family snaps mainly. When I went to collect them the lad on the counter told me that I needed proof of consent from the photographer to reproduce some of them. I explained that I had taken them in my lounge, but he seemed unconvinced. I argued with him for a few mins and eventually he gave in. When I got them, they had separated the ones with the plain black and white backgrounds and assumed a professional had taken them, despite the fact that some of the outdoor shots were a lot better.

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Weird!

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
No doubt an edict from Head Office to try to stop copyright theft - but the poor bloke in the front line has to make the decision.

Ledaig

1,806 posts

291 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
On a positive side, at least they are trying to prevent copyright issues.

Can you take your relevant kit down with you and have them compare it with the exif info from some of the images?

wetny

Original Poster:

486 posts

241 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Ledaig said:
On a positive side, at least they are trying to prevent copyright issues.

Can you take your relevant kit down with you and have them compare it with the exif info from some of the images?
I suppose I going home for the kit would have been the next step, but I would have thought that the person placing the order would have been liable rather than the printer.

Craikeybaby

12,098 posts

254 months

Wednesday 15th February 2012
quotequote all
I think it is a good thing.

Do you have your details embedded in metadata? That would be a good indication that you have taken the pictures.

kybo

1,166 posts

224 months

Wednesday 15th February 2012
quotequote all
I'd like to know what they deem as acceptable proof? And how would they know how legit it is?

Copyright theft needs to be prevented, but how can it be policed effectively, without introducing this level of difficulty?

I wonder what would happen if you wrote your own letter, granted yourself ownership/permission to reproduce the images, signed it and handed it over.

Genuine questions.

Scott

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Wednesday 15th February 2012
quotequote all
I personally think it is a good thing.

Having has to chase a website owner only yesterday to remove one of my shots that had been stolen and having a photographer friend have an even worse situation http://blog.neillwatson.com/opinions/sir-stirling-... anything that can be done to stop people stealing images is a good thing.

XG332

3,927 posts

217 months

Wednesday 15th February 2012
quotequote all
I had to do this whilst working at Jessops, although usually its School photos or those cheesy horrid cheap photo shoots.
Usually everybody turns into a lawyer. I even had one lady rip of the photographers sticker in a vain attempt at making me change my mind. I suggested she phoned the photographer, who in short told her she wasn't allowed. She mumbled something, snatched her photo and crawled off. The sticker even said not to be produced without consent.

We had forms that if we are unsure we can get the customer to sign, saying that they accept all responsibility.