Macro Photography
Author
Discussion

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
I'm looking at buying a Macro lens for my Nikon d3100 I found this one on Amazon anyone used it before?
Will it be a good lens for close-ups and is there anything else I'm going to need to take good shots.
Amazon is selling this for £76 sounds like a good price for lens? confused

Nikon AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D Lens



Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
This is not a macro lens, so it doesn't get you close to the subject on its own. You can use extension tubes or reverse the lens instead though.

Also, I think you don't get AF with a D lens on D3100??

Edited by Gemm on Saturday 18th August 10:40

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
Sorry about that I typed in Marco lens and this one came up.jester
I read a couple of the reviews and AF is not supported which is a shame. What type of photograph would this lens be used for?

And can you recommend a Macro lens for my camera

Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
Many people swear by this inexpensive fast lens. It can be useful in low-light situations or when you want a very shallow DoF, but personally I had no use for it for MY photography when I had it. It made a great paper-weight though!

True macro lens will give you a 1:1 magnification by itself. 100mm f2.8 is the standard. You can get 50mm too but the working distance is shorter, so it may not be suitable for some subjects (e.g. shy insects).

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
Thanks Gemm some really helpful advice there and you have saved me some money to bow

Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
Well, don't take in everything I say! That lens (50mm f1.8) may be so beneficial for you like I believe it is for so many people (proper AF version, that is).

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
Yeah I would rather like the AF version makes life easier in some cases I guess I need a little more knowledge before I purchase something

rxtx

6,050 posts

239 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
That is a "proper AF" version, it's just the camera doesn't have an AF screw. That is a cracking little lens, but isn't a macro.

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
rxtx said:
That is a "proper AF" version, it's just the camera doesn't have an AF screw. That is a cracking little lens, but isn't a macro.
what kind of pictures would you take with this lens?

rxtx

6,050 posts

239 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
You would use it for anything and everything depending on what you're trying to achieve. A 50mm on a full frame camera gives a field of view similar to the human eye, so photos would reflect what you actually see. On a crop sensor you have an equivalent of around 75mm, which may be useful for portraits.

They are cheap and light, don't stick out like a sore thumb (good for candids), and at f/1.8 (or f/1.4 for the more expensive version) let in a lot of light removing the need for a flash in some cases, at the expense of depth of field. That narrow depth of field is also a selling point. Stopped down a bit they (primes) are usually very sharp too.

Bang for buck I think everyone should have one.

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
milner993 said:
.... a good lens for close-ups and is there anything else I'm going to need to take good shots.
Depends upon what you are intending to photograph (and how close you want to get)

Other needs:

Stability - a damn good tripod
Lighting - again depends what you are intending to shoot and how close you want to get.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Saturday 18th August 2012
quotequote all
milner993 said:
Yeah I would rather like the AF version makes life easier in some cases I guess I need a little more knowledge before I purchase something
Whilst most macro lenses for your sort of camera have autofocus, it isn't very useful for macro-photography. Most likely you'll find yourself using manual focus.


Anyway, if you want to get closer than your current lens allows you've got a few good choices:

- Extension tubes. These go between your existing lens and the camera and allow it to focus more closely. E.g.: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Polaroid-Focus-Extension-D...

- Close-up filter. This goes on to the front of your existing lens and magnifies the view. E.g.: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raynox-DCR-250-Macro-Attac...

- A specialist macro lens. These can be used in conjunction with the above and can be used for normal photos too. E.g.: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nikon-AF-S-Micro-NIKKOR-85...

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
- Extension tubes. These go between your existing lens and the camera and allow it to focus more closely. E.g.: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Polaroid-Focus-Extension-D...

The extension tubes seem to be a good idea and would fit into my bag I might look a little more closly at these

Thank you everyone for all your comments you have all really helped

Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
Don't forget the reversing ring too. It's even cheaper and smaller!

milner993

Original Poster:

1,364 posts

191 months

Sunday 19th August 2012
quotequote all
I havent I will be looking into all aspects of macro equipment and I'm all for Cheap but quality too type