I have a cunning plan.....
I have a cunning plan.....
Author
Discussion

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Being a bit frustrated with a bridge camera and having had a Canon 450d which I sold to prevent myself being sucked into buying expensive lenses ive come up with a plan (just call me Baldrick)

Im gonna buy the lens i want FIRST, before buying a body (the chicken and egg syndrome) as i cant decide between Nikon or Canon (about a 60d or 600d).....I think ill end up buying about £200 worth of lens, so what should i look for, Nikon VR or Canon EF or EF-S? USM?

marctwo

3,666 posts

289 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Here's a curveball: how about buying a fixed lens system like a Fuji X100? Great quality but no chance of getting sucked into buying loads of lenses. I don't think a £200 Canon or Nikon lens is going to be all that amazing.

ChipsAndCheese

1,608 posts

193 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
On the Nikon side of things, VR is vibration reduction/image stabilisation and will be found on zoom lenses. Depending on how much you want to spend on a body, you would probably also want AF-S lenses as these have the motor in the lens and will work on the cheaper bodies that don't have a focus motor in the body.

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
On the Canon side EF lenses fit all Canon digital bodies, EF-S only fit the cropped sensor bodies (eg xxxxD, xxxD, xxD ranges plus the 7D) and are usually cheaper.

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
I think you would probably be better with a decent compact but if you are definitely wanting a DSLR then why not a nifty fifty?

Cheap as well http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005K47...

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
ChipsAndCheese said:
On the Nikon side of things, VR is vibration reduction/image stabilisation and will be found on zoom lenses.
And some primes.










Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
How will you know what make of lens to buy if you don't know what make of body it has to fit?

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How will you know what make of lens to buy if you don't know what make of body it has to fit?
That's so simple, though. Nikkor makes the best glass (unless you're going Zeiss or Voigtländer, admittedly) for dSLR format. So you just go and buy a 200-400mm f/2.8 AFS VRII lens and go from there....... silly

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How will you know what make of lens to buy if you don't know what make of body it has to fit?
I'm with Simpo on this, unless there is a really unusual lens that you need which no other manufacturer offers (eg a 0.95 Noctilux) why would you start about it back to front like this?

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Easy.

All the bodies do pretty much the same thing. So really, why wouldn't you?

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
How will you know what make of lens to buy if you don't know what make of body it has to fit?
cos ill buy the body to suit the lens and hopefully get a good deal on a lens i want first, if i buy the body first ive only half the choices in lens...



Semi hemi

1,801 posts

227 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
You are strange, even by PH standards... very strange

MadeInEngland

290 posts

262 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
cos ill buy the body to suit the lens and hopefully get a good deal on a lens i want first, if i buy the body first ive only half the choices in lens...
And...if you buy the lens first, you only have half the choice in bodies.

You have some strange logic, do you work with my wife?

Vipers

33,497 posts

257 months

Thursday 13th December 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
Being a bit frustrated with a bridge camera
What is a bridge camera?




smile

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 14th December 2012
quotequote all
Reminds me of the old days when some third party lens manufacturers would sell a lens and a separate fitting kit. Of course it was mainly just a mount with no AF or anything else to consider.

These days one can buy adapters for cross body use but I assume they have limitations.

I bought a Nikon lens to EOS body adapter when I was setting out to obtain my Samyang 14mm lens. The basis of the decision was that the Nikon fit would allow me to sell on, should I decide not to keep it, to either Nikon or Canon owners. However when I studied things a little more it looked like tha lens operation (full manual) might be more awkward using the Nikon version + adapter so I bought the Canon fit anyway. Like the lens anyway so I kept it. Still have the adapter as well - unused so far but you never know whan an opportunity might arise.

The idea of buying a lens first and body second may have some traction if you were looking at some likt the Micro 4/3 systems or Sony NEX or something with interchanmgable lenses and readily available adapters for them. However whether the reason for buying the lens would still be valid once deployed on such a body is another matter.

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Friday 14th December 2012
quotequote all
I can only liken this to buying a set of alloys then deciding on what car to but and fit them to at a later date.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 14th December 2012
quotequote all
14-7 said:
I can only liken this to buying a set of alloys then deciding on what car to but and fit them to at a later date.
At the DSLR end of photography, possibly.

Medium format, however, would offer all sorts of options for lenses, bodies and backs and a lens choice there might then offer any combination on the market or restrict one to a specific body choice and so, perhaps, digital back choice too.

However in terms of the budget mentioned in the original post unless there are a couple of 0s missing this consideration will not be troubling us here.

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Friday 14th December 2012
quotequote all
LongQ said:
14-7 said:
I can only liken this to buying a set of alloys then deciding on what car to but and fit them to at a later date.
At the DSLR end of photography, possibly.

Medium format, however, would offer all sorts of options for lenses, bodies and backs and a lens choice there might then offer any combination on the market or restrict one to a specific body choice and so, perhaps, digital back choice too.

However in terms of the budget mentioned in the original post unless there are a couple of 0s missing this consideration will not be troubling us here.
I find myself agreeing to an extent with both LongQ and the OP.

If you are going to buy some kit, especially with a specific task in mind, it is easy to see why you would start with the lenses. Obviously it is the lens that makes most impact on the final outcome, followed closely by what the sensor does.

However LQ is right, with a £10k budget - and worrying about TS lenses and special stuff - there are a number of factors and quality of glass has to be high up.

But even at a low budget, some Ebaying and bargain hunting in sight, its still no comparison to which wheels you put on a car!!!

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 14th December 2012
quotequote all
K12beano said:
But even at a low budget, some Ebaying and bargain hunting in sight, its still no comparison to which wheels you put on a car!!!
Hmm. More like deciding on the tyres (they may have performance characteristics that one finds desirable) and then choosing a vehicle known to have the right sized wheel options together with being able to make use of the tyre's performance.

If looking at specifics like T&S lenses (as already mentioned) or leaf shutters things are different. But then so is the price point.