D300 second hand
Author
Discussion

robpearson

Original Poster:

441 posts

231 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
I'm already in the Nikon camp with a D5100, several lenses, mostly DX and one FX an a SB600. I'm thinking it's time to get a fill frame body, and my local Calumet have D300's with battery and charger available from £300 depending on condition. Does this sound reasonable? Would anyone suggest anything else given the kit I already own?

thanks

Mr Will

13,719 posts

235 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
Unless I'm very much mistaken, the D300 isn't full frame confused

greggers

208 posts

227 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
Agree, it's not full frame (hence the price). Look for a D3 for a Pro-Body or D700 for full-frame in a smaller body.


robpearson

Original Poster:

441 posts

231 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
I'll have a look for the d3 or D700 then. Thanks for the rapid replies

greggers

208 posts

227 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
Out of interest, what makes you want to get a full-frame? When I weighed up all of the pros and cons I couldn't justify it... Went for a D7000 instead.

ian in lancs

3,853 posts

227 months

Tuesday 4th June 2013
quotequote all
I've got a D3 and D700s. My recommendation is to go for a D700 and a battery grip. At least that way you have options and its lighter. There is no difference in quality and the D700 menu / handling is slightly better. A D700 is also way cheaper, almost half the price of a D3.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Wednesday 5th June 2013
quotequote all
Be prepared to spend money on lenses, the D700 will show up some glass that you'll get away with fine on a crop sensor. I ended up on primes with my D700 and a 70-300 for reach

ian in lancs

3,853 posts

227 months

Wednesday 5th June 2013
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
Be prepared to spend money on lenses, the D700 will show up some glass that you'll get away with fine on a crop sensor. I ended up on primes with my D700 and a 70-300 for reach
yep! be prepared to buy the 24-70, 70-200 and maybe the 14-24 / 16-35; goodbye £3k5. Bloody heavy too!

robpearson

Original Poster:

441 posts

231 months

Friday 7th June 2013
quotequote all
Greggers, my primary motivation was that I believe it should be better in lower light levels. Does that still stand when I'm looking at an older full frame when compared to a newer DX?

Mr Will

13,719 posts

235 months

Friday 7th June 2013
quotequote all
It holds true for Canon and I think it does for Nikon as well.

Take a look at the "Measurements" tab here: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-C...
(apologies for DXO link)

robpearson

Original Poster:

441 posts

231 months

Friday 7th June 2013
quotequote all
Thanks Will, I get the impression from a fair few reviews now that I'm not going to see a truly great improvement over my existing body unless i move to something like the D600. so very tempting.

Matt Seabrook

563 posts

280 months

Friday 7th June 2013
quotequote all
D700 is great in low light. Highly recommended if you can find a good one second hand at sensible money.