Travels of a Simpo
Author
Discussion

simpo two

Original Poster:

90,497 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
Wandered round a couple of quaint Suffolk villages today... Funny thing is, I don't really figure out what to do with them until I get them home and engage the PhotoShop machine. With digital I'm discovering that often the best shot needs a bit of encouragement to emerge... (apologies for the filesize mangling)












parrot of doom

23,075 posts

254 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
The bridge shot is superb, nice perspective, was the sun low in the sky?

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

263 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Very nice. Here's my interpretation of the last one,

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

268 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
I like the black and whites!

It's amazing that you can make a good photo into a great one with a bit of messing about. However I still find that a crap photo is a crap photo no matter what you do!

Can you tell me, did you achieve the effect by increasing contrast and slightly dropping brightness? Or is there another trick that I don't know about?

Marki

15,763 posts

290 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
What is a simpo any road upp

wolves_wanderer

12,888 posts

257 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Love the Lady Street shot. Am I imagining or is there a slight yellow/brown tinge to it. If there is, it looks proper bo, if not please excuse the deluded ramblings of a madman. Love the combination of textures in that pic though

Edited to correct liquid-lunch induced spelling errors

>> Edited by wolves_wanderer on Friday 22 October 16:02

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

268 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
INterestingly, I've got a photo I took in Central Park which is almost the negative of this one:



Here it is - quality is very low, cos I used a low quality web version before I started;

simpo two

Original Poster:

90,497 posts

285 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Erk - too many questions!! I will do my best:

Parrot of Doom (cool name BTW): No, the sun wasn't low in the sky but the sky was 'hotter' than the rest. Hence when I cranked the contrast up, the sky burnt out. Technically incorrect but in this case I can live with it.

dcw@pr: I increased saturation on this one but I see you were more ruthless!

Dobbo: B&W is a great but subtle thing - but I could never do it until I went digital. Your guess is spot on, but you can also play with channel mixer to emphasise certain colours. That's how I got the sky to go black - it was entirely unplanned when I took the shot.

Marki: A Simpo is... well, it's all on the profile.

Wolves w: Your eyes are still working through the beer goggles - it's actually a colour shot, no clever stuff at all!

The only shot that demanded other than 'P' was the one no-one mentioned: the waving grass over the tombstone - 1/50th at f22 to get the grass blurred. Perhaps this is where colour might have been better - or spot - unfortunately due to the blur that would take some doing.

Thanks for the comments folks and I hope you enjoyed a car-free post

V6GTO

11,579 posts

262 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Simpo,
I love that moving grass! Martin.

bacchus180

779 posts

304 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
so your classic winibago doesn't count...LOL, incidently I prefer your version, the renewed one looks oversharp and oversat... but then working with such a small image can quite often do this...

You mention only not using P on one picture.... you should do it more often.....you got good results, also it will make you think more and then make minor changes in camera more. remember PS is a wonderful tool but it does just rip photos apart if overdone.

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

263 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
simpo two said:
dcw@pr: I increased saturation on this one but I see you were more ruthless!


Actually it has saturation -50 in Photoshop! But the contrast in boosted a lot. My screen here is quite low contrast compared to an average one, just because it is more optimized for getting prints out of it - I looked at the photo on a "normal" screen and the effect is probably a bit OTT on there...