Shutterstock "understand my concern"
Shutterstock "understand my concern"
Author
Discussion

Fezant Pluckah

Original Poster:

1,711 posts

240 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
So, I emailed Splutterfrock because I found that Saga had one of my pictures on their travel web site.

On both occasions that I got a (prompt) reply from Stuttersock the lady put "I understand your concern"...

Do you? I think it's bloody outrageous that a commercial web site can purchase an image off Shuddercock and pay a mere 25c for it, and not even have to credit the taker of the photo.

Time to pull the plug on them, me thinks...

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Did you expect to see a watermark and a name in the bottom corner or something?


R I C H

62 posts

174 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I used to own an equestrian business. Horse and Hound magazine featured a business advertising arena footing, with pictures of my indoor arena used as an example testimonial. The photos were stolen from my business website. I'm based in BC, Canada, the arena footing business was in greater London, so I assume they thought they'd get away with it and nobody would notice. They didn't consider an ex-pat might read the Horse and Hound, or that the ex-pat's friends in the UK that read the magazine might wonder why a business thousands of miles away was being used as a reference.

I complained to the magazine and to the advertiser. Received a printed apology for the misleading nature of the featured ad and a small amount of compensation.


Simpo Two

92,680 posts

294 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Fezant Pluckah said:
So, I emailed Splutterfrock because I found that Saga had one of my pictures on their travel web site... I think it's bloody outrageous that a commercial web site can purchase an image off Shuddercock and pay a mere 25c for it, and not even have to credit the taker of the photo.
When you upload photos to a photo library, do you get a chance to set prices? Or do you upload knowing that others can buy usage for 25c? Seems to me it's their arena and if you don't like the deal on offer, don't go there.

The_Jackal

4,854 posts

226 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
So nothing untoward has been done? Are you just complaining about their price structure?
I have no experience but surely if you buy a stock photo you dont have to credit the photographer.

checkmate91

861 posts

202 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Exactly this ^ what are the T&Cs of putting forward an image?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
One reason I don't do stock.

25c for a limited use small web size image.. So not worth the effort

JustinMinns

262 posts

250 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Fezant Pluckah said:
So, I emailed Splutterfrock because I found that Saga had one of my pictures on their travel web site.

On both occasions that I got a (prompt) reply from Stuttersock the lady put "I understand your concern"...

Do you? I think it's bloody outrageous that a commercial web site can purchase an image off Shuddercock and pay a mere 25c for it, and not even have to credit the taker of the photo.

Time to pull the plug on them, me thinks...
Shutterstock do indeed suck but that is what happens with royalty free microstock, what were you expecting?



Edited by JustinMinns on Monday 27th January 23:10

Simpo Two

92,680 posts

294 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Maths time at Simpo Towers....

Average wage £25K (combination of PH powerfully-built directors and immigrants on min wage).

£25K is about $30K.

Therefore at 25c a pop I have to sell 120,000 photos a year, or 328 a day.

Nope, not biting.

sgrimshaw

7,585 posts

279 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Maths time at Simpo Towers....

Average wage £25K (combination of PH powerfully-built directors and immigrants on min wage).

£25K is about $30K.

Therefore at 25c a pop I have to sell 120,000 photos a year, or 328 a day.

Nope, not biting.
Cough, £25k is over $40k.

You'd need to sell 160,000 a year wink

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
It is bonkers that they sell images so cheaply, but that's why I don't contribute anything to stock libraries. I guess it's lesson learned OP, pull the plug on them!

Ed_P

701 posts

298 months

Tuesday 28th January 2014
quotequote all
I've been submitting a modest number of images to microstock libraries over the 6 years. Now have around 500 images in each. During that time I've had around 18,000 sales and $13,000 of income. Although the average income/sale is less than $1.00, the total number of sales makes it (to me), reasonably worthwhile. To make it more palatable, I just look at the "bottom line", not individual sales. It's decent pocket money!