Photos on a white background? Watch out...
Photos on a white background? Watch out...
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,957 posts

295 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Or expect a visit from the nice people at Amazon...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/09/amazon_gra...

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT...




I thought I had too much time but clearly some people have even more.

GetCarter

31,297 posts

309 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Ridiculous.

crmcatee

5,808 posts

257 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Heads off to register 'Taking photographs with a black background'.

Just working on the wording of my preferred embodiment.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,957 posts

295 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Good idea. Search and replace 'white' for 'black'.

I'm off to do 'blue' and define the wavelength range in nanometres...

MartinP

1,275 posts

268 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Love to know how they're going to convince anyone that's at all novel.

Maybe I can patent spot colour and stop it from ever being used again.

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

213 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Good luck enforcing that. Surely there has to be more context to that patent.

V8LM

5,563 posts

239 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Prior art, inventiveness, obviousness, all render that (almost) useless.

baz7175

3,551 posts

241 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Good idea. Search and replace 'white' for 'black'.

I'm off to do 'blue' and define the wavelength range in nanometres...
Go for Angstroms, just for good measure wink

ExPat2B

2,159 posts

230 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
For a good laugh take a look at the diagram that accompanies it. Makes it fairly obvious its a patent troll.

Xerstead

724 posts

208 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
I've seen this come up on a couple of photography pages. One of the more sensible replies suggested that this was a defensive move to stop others claiming it for themselves and trying to sue Amazon.

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
I wonder if you could patent patenting?

Might get away with it in the States.

agent006

12,058 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Define white.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,957 posts

295 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
255:255:255?

GetCarter

31,297 posts

309 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
  1. ffffff ?

Otispunkmeyer

13,820 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
equal portions of every wavelength in the range 390 to 780 nm?

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,957 posts

295 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Define portion!

crmcatee

5,808 posts

257 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Define portion!

Elderly

3,738 posts

268 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
I doubt that they could file that patent as I believe somebody might have used that technique publicly already ....... I quote:

"A patent may only be granted for an invention that is new (the requirement of novelty). Under English law, an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. The UK Patents Act 1977 states that the state of the art in the case of an invention is taken to comprise everything (whether it is a product, a process, information, or anything else) that has at any time before the priority date of the patent been made available to the public (whether in the UK or elsewhere) by written or oral description, or by use in any other way."

crmcatee

5,808 posts

257 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Yes - but the patent was given in the US.


LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Elderly said:
I doubt that they could file that patent as I believe somebody might have used that technique publicly already ....... I quote:

"A patent may only be granted for an invention that is new (the requirement of novelty). Under English law, an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. The UK Patents Act 1977 states that the state of the art in the case of an invention is taken to comprise everything (whether it is a product, a process, information, or anything else) that has at any time before the priority date of the patent been made available to the public (whether in the UK or elsewhere) by written or oral description, or by use in any other way."
Here


Seems to have number but it's not entirely clear whether it is approved or still in process.