Photos on a white background? Watch out...
Photos on a white background? Watch out...
Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,680 posts

294 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Or expect a visit from the nice people at Amazon...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/09/amazon_gra...

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT...




I thought I had too much time but clearly some people have even more.

GetCarter

31,226 posts

308 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Ridiculous.

crmcatee

5,803 posts

256 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Heads off to register 'Taking photographs with a black background'.

Just working on the wording of my preferred embodiment.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,680 posts

294 months

Sunday 11th May 2014
quotequote all
Good idea. Search and replace 'white' for 'black'.

I'm off to do 'blue' and define the wavelength range in nanometres...

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Love to know how they're going to convince anyone that's at all novel.

Maybe I can patent spot colour and stop it from ever being used again.

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

212 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Good luck enforcing that. Surely there has to be more context to that patent.

V8LM

5,553 posts

238 months

Monday 12th May 2014
quotequote all
Prior art, inventiveness, obviousness, all render that (almost) useless.

baz7175

3,551 posts

240 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Good idea. Search and replace 'white' for 'black'.

I'm off to do 'blue' and define the wavelength range in nanometres...
Go for Angstroms, just for good measure wink

ExPat2B

2,159 posts

229 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
For a good laugh take a look at the diagram that accompanies it. Makes it fairly obvious its a patent troll.

Xerstead

724 posts

207 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
I've seen this come up on a couple of photography pages. One of the more sensible replies suggested that this was a defensive move to stop others claiming it for themselves and trying to sue Amazon.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
I wonder if you could patent patenting?

Might get away with it in the States.

agent006

12,058 posts

293 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Define white.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,680 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
255:255:255?

GetCarter

31,226 posts

308 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
  1. ffffff ?

Otispunkmeyer

13,759 posts

184 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
equal portions of every wavelength in the range 390 to 780 nm?

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

92,680 posts

294 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Define portion!

crmcatee

5,803 posts

256 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Define portion!

Elderly

3,735 posts

267 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
I doubt that they could file that patent as I believe somebody might have used that technique publicly already ....... I quote:

"A patent may only be granted for an invention that is new (the requirement of novelty). Under English law, an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. The UK Patents Act 1977 states that the state of the art in the case of an invention is taken to comprise everything (whether it is a product, a process, information, or anything else) that has at any time before the priority date of the patent been made available to the public (whether in the UK or elsewhere) by written or oral description, or by use in any other way."

crmcatee

5,803 posts

256 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Yes - but the patent was given in the US.


LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Elderly said:
I doubt that they could file that patent as I believe somebody might have used that technique publicly already ....... I quote:

"A patent may only be granted for an invention that is new (the requirement of novelty). Under English law, an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. The UK Patents Act 1977 states that the state of the art in the case of an invention is taken to comprise everything (whether it is a product, a process, information, or anything else) that has at any time before the priority date of the patent been made available to the public (whether in the UK or elsewhere) by written or oral description, or by use in any other way."
Here


Seems to have number but it's not entirely clear whether it is approved or still in process.