Photographs for insurance purposes.
Discussion
Well it's sort of a photography question....
I need to photograph some valuables - watches, jewellery etc just in case the unthinkable happens.
My question is - should (or more to the point can) I take them with a digital camera or would they only be acceptable on good old 35mm??
Cheers
Chris
I need to photograph some valuables - watches, jewellery etc just in case the unthinkable happens.
My question is - should (or more to the point can) I take them with a digital camera or would they only be acceptable on good old 35mm??
Cheers
Chris
simpo two said:
I saw a traffic bastards in Colchester using a digital cameras to prove a car was parked on a yellow line - so I guess it's good enough for a court. But if in doubt call your insurers - better safe than sorry.
Couldn't they Photoshop an extra yellow line in and make it worse?
M.
simpo two said:Our good friends at Canon have come up with a solution for this.
Don't give them ideas!
But - as digital photos are easy to alter, they offer less proof than silver halide.
I saw something about a way to tell if a picture had been altered, but don't know how it worked.
www.dpreview.com/news/0401/04012903canondvke2.asp
No doubt Nikon will do the same in a few years!

Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


