simple cheapish point and shoot very fast autofocus
simple cheapish point and shoot very fast autofocus
Author
Discussion

Norfolkandchance

Original Poster:

2,104 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
My mum (70) gets very frustrated that her "point-and-shoot" camera takes too long to focus meaning she misses the grand children doing something good. I'd like to buy her a cheap (sub £50) camera for just this purpose - snapping grand children inside and outside. She won't use any options or settings except maybe flash on or off and then only then if she tries it on auto and doesn't like the result!

Am I being to ambitious, given price?

Thanks

rottie102

4,033 posts

208 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Norfolkandchance said:
My mum (70) gets very frustrated that her "point-and-shoot" camera takes too long to focus meaning she misses the grand children doing something good. I'd like to buy her a cheap (sub £50) camera for just this purpose - snapping grand children inside and outside. She won't use any options or settings except maybe flash on or off and then only then if she tries it on auto and doesn't like the result!

Am I being to ambitious, given price?

Thanks
Yes

Hth smile

Zoon

7,223 posts

145 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Whatever you do, don't buy a Nikon 1.
Absolute garbage, the marketing spiel states it can focus before you press the button. Reality is it takes about 5 seconds, by which time your subject has disappeared or moved completely.

Simpo Two

91,516 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
POS cameras use a different focus system which is simply slower than the ones DSLRs use.

I have a Lumix XS3 for shirtpocket snaps. A bit more than £50 but fast to start up, very small and good for the price. And a focus assist light too.

This is the red one: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Panasonic-DMC-XS3EB-R-Comp...

K12beano

20,854 posts

299 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
...for shirtpocket snaps.
Pretty sure I've seen that gallery - all the shirt pockets were particularly in focus.



Simpo Two

91,516 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
That's beyond groan...

K12beano

20,854 posts

299 months

Thursday 4th June 2015
quotequote all
So, OP.... There are no miracle cures, since all cameras are built down to a price point, which means compromises.

Bigger sensor with more light would be good for turning the ISO up and keeping the aperture down - thus making the focus point less critical......except that as you make the sensor bigger you are, guess what..... making the focus more critical!

Personally, if there was a choice go for a shorter focal length lens, or if a zoom lens one that's not too extreme. Then at least you haven't got the camera making long, slow (relatively) focus and focal length adjustments for half a minute.

rottie102

4,033 posts

208 months

Thursday 4th June 2015
quotequote all
There is a big chance that her phone will be better at taking those snaps than <£50 camera anyway, Maybe try to recommend that?

LongQ

13,864 posts

257 months

Thursday 4th June 2015
quotequote all
Back in the early days of small digital cameras there were a few with non-zoom fixed focus lenses.

Something like that should be somewhat quicker to be ready if you can find such a thing these days.

Image quality could be quite good bit of course that was down to the simple lens set up.

Not unlike the Box Brownie of old that found favour with many people at the time.