'68 Charger
Author
Discussion

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,451 posts

256 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all


1.3s F3.5 18mm ISO400 and a healthy dose of photoshop

>> Edited by badbeachbuggy on Thursday 5th May 19:51

FourWheelDrift

91,618 posts

305 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
Nice pic



Hmmmmmm........Daisy Duke.......

ErnestM

11,621 posts

288 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
[pedant]
IIRC "General Lee" was a 1969 Charger R/T (split front grill)
[/pedant]


ErnestM

rj_vaughan

241 posts

273 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
you forgot to photoshop the driver in!

Like it!

wedge girl

4,688 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
Any chance of posting the original? So I can see before and after shots.

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,451 posts

256 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
This is how is started...



wedge girl

4,688 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
I like the original shot, infact you've got me thinking I need one of them.

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,451 posts

256 months

Thursday 5th May 2005
quotequote all
'67s are much classier

bilko2

1,693 posts

253 months

Friday 6th May 2005
quotequote all
I like the original as well. Good night/dusk photo

dinkel

27,583 posts

279 months

Friday 6th May 2005
quotequote all
badbeachbuggy said:
'67s are much classier


no R/T . . .

www.dreams-cars.net/galerie-dodge-charger-rt-1969.html

http://musclecar.turboblog.fr/photos/uncategorized/dodge_charger_1.jpg

Is this one of the most photogenic cars of all time or what?!

Like ur pic . . . don't like to much PS, sorry.

V6GTO

11,579 posts

263 months

Friday 6th May 2005
quotequote all
badbeachbuggy said:
'67s are much classier


I agree that '67s are classier...(I had a '67 351SS convertible Camaro a long time ago)

Martin.

pzero64

2,107 posts

262 months

dinkel

27,583 posts

279 months

Friday 6th May 2005
quotequote all
Yum indeed. It looks a million dollars just standing there in black . . .