no substitute for megapixels
Discussion
I was photographing this young lady last week... and whilst doing a cpl of test shots to set lights etc.. I always pull up a preview and pull up a definition window and use a dropper to measure the values etc.. I heard from over my shoulder
"bloody hell! you can see my contact lenses..."
just shows the power of modern sensors....
she got naked later....
"bloody hell! you can see my contact lenses..."
just shows the power of modern sensors....
she got naked later....
bacchus180 said:
oh another thing.. paul(bacardi) you can see I've solved all the colour problems ( I shot in mono now )
That's the answer mate!
Had a play with those files I took away with me and there's no problem with the res', that's for sure! Now, I hope you're not going to cause trouble by posting naughty pictures? Just remember, keep them B&W and include the lighting diagram! (I was going to drop Grant a mail re my visit for some feed back re the software etc, haven't had a chance but will report in soon.)
>> Edited by Bacardi on Saturday 7th May 22:08
bacchus180 said:
Model said:
"bloody hell! you can see my contact lenses..."
just shows the power of modern sensors....
You can also see the photographer if I am not mistaken.
(Or did you have an audience?
) No wonder all the cameras with pre-programmed setting for 'portrait' always seem to make the first part of the setting a very 'soft' filter .. !
bacardi said:
I hope you're not going to cause trouble by posting naughty pictures?
not this time...lol.
dobbo said:
So that's what 15 thousand plus quids worth of kit gets you eh?
yes mate.. expensive black and white pics..
actually the shoot was a disaster.. felt crap due to an ear infection, camera kept locking up after 10 shots and had to be rebooted. lighting wasn't working very well... infact sent her home and said we would do it another day... and went back to bed!
I wonder how much this little baby costs:
www.fairchildimaging.com/main/ccd_area_595.htm
That's 89.934656 megapixels!
With that in a camera you'd be able to see the contact lenses in the photographer, never mind the model!
Okay, Im starting to wonder what it shows in the nude shots, so I better stop there
Mike
www.fairchildimaging.com/main/ccd_area_595.htm
That's 89.934656 megapixels!
With that in a camera you'd be able to see the contact lenses in the photographer, never mind the model!
Okay, Im starting to wonder what it shows in the nude shots, so I better stop there
Mike
yarissi said:
That be Rebecca Dee she seems like a nice girl.
yarissi said:
Thats Miss Dee. She seems like a nice girl. What are the photos for?
yarissi said:
Thats Miss Dee isn't it.
She seems like a nice lady. What were the photographs for?
your very keen.. obviously a big fan
calm down.. she was here to do some portfolio work. I'll put one more up for yah since you obviously are smitten! zad said:
That's 89.934656 megapixels!
just imagine the file sizes.. if they aren't big enough already.. infact too big!
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff