Another what digi camera thread!
Another what digi camera thread!
Author
Discussion

NiceCupOfTea

Original Poster:

25,516 posts

272 months

Monday 16th May 2005
quotequote all
Hello folks!

These are getting about as common as "What car" threads in GG!

Anyway, I am looking for my second camera to replace an Olympus C220zoom.

Price range 3-400 quid including decent amount of memory.

I want something that can do everything automatically, but that I can really experiment with on manual settings when I have some time.

Size/weight it important - I don't want to be leaving the camera at home because it's too bulky, especially on holiday, etc., but equally I don't want something that is too light and looks like a toy!

I spent a while looking at Sonys as my dad had one a few years ago that was superb. Looked very closely at the P200 but decided that it a) wasn't "manual" enough, and b) I didn't like the thought of pricey Memory Stick.

I've just spent a bit of time looking at Canons, and picked out these 4 :

A95 - looks good, Mrs.NCoT has the A70 (I think) which seems good, but I can afford a bit more so maybe I could get something better?

Powershot S1 IS - again, looks very impressive, but perhaps a little bulky? Thoughts.

G6 - looks amazing, but maybe pushing the budget, and bulk is again a concern - seems less bulky than S1 though.

S70 - thought this looked perfect for a while - good size, good spec, right sort of price, but the movie aspect is very limited and it used proprietary rechargeables...


People have mentioned the Panasonic Lumix FX-20 but I am put off by the lack of viewfinder.

Haven't looked too closely at Nikon or Fuji yet.

As a general rule of thumb, how awkward to carry around are the sticky-out lens cameras like the Lumix and S1? They do look a nightmare to carry, but I think they're smaller in your hand than they look if that makes sense? Some of the ones I have seen look ridiculous (Sony F828 for example - looks about a foot long!)

Looking for any general advice people can give, this has been on my mind for 6 months now!

size13

2,032 posts

278 months

Monday 16th May 2005
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
Hello folks!
People have mentioned the Panasonic Lumix FX-20 but I am put off by the lack of viewfinder.

what do you mean?

Ex-biker

1,315 posts

268 months

Monday 16th May 2005
quotequote all
The Lumix range seem to get some very good veviews.

As for the S1 iS, why not look at the S2 iS?

LongQ

13,864 posts

254 months

Monday 16th May 2005
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:

Powershot S1 IS - again, looks very impressive, but perhaps a little bulky? Thoughts.


Looking for any general advice people can give, this has been on my mind for 6 months now!


This may be of interest.

www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-6466-7774


I don't have any knowledge of the current batch of upper end non dSLR cameras. I decided that my primary requirement was related to size and something very pocketable (based on a largely good experience with a little Sony DSC U30 last year.) So I only ooked at the smallest cameras around and picked the Pentax Option S - of which the S5i was the current model when I took the plunge last autumn.

If you want comprehensive manual control you needs to look elsewhere, though you can manipulate things a fair bit if you choose to to play with all the settings available. But on balance I was looking for something that could be available, in a pocket, at all times yet offer potential for high quality results and the Pentax does that for me. There are a few other very small units which offer much the same - the little Casios for example.

Making 'smallest' the prime decision factor and 'physical zoom' a secondary also helped to reduce the choices! It made for a much easier decision. However I suspect your selection criteria have a wider requirement base than mine.