Wurgh!! D200?

Author
Discussion

simpo two

Original Poster:

86,911 posts

271 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all


http://tech.tom.com/2118/2120/2005411-178808.html

Hang on, I've just seem how they spelled 'legend'! Panic over, back to base.

>> Edited by simpo two on Wednesday 13th July 18:11

beano500

20,854 posts

281 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
Leg

End



more like......

V6GTO

11,579 posts

248 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
Spoof?

Martin.

_dobbo_

14,617 posts

254 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:


http://tech.tom.com/2118/2120/2005411-178808.html

Hang on, I've just seem how they spelled 'legend'! Panic over, back to base.

>> Edited by simpo two on Wednesday 13th July 18:11


I was looking at $1995 and already trying to find a way to justify it... Thank the lord it's a fake!!!

Only a matter of time though... gulp.

V6GTO

11,579 posts

248 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
A Nikon camera to worry the 20D at last

Martin.

imperialism2024

1,596 posts

262 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
V6GTO said:
A Nikon camera to worry the 20D at last

Martin.


You've forgotten about the D70?

www.kenrockwell.com/tech/20dd70.htm

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

254 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
imperialism2024 said:

V6GTO said:
A Nikon camera to worry the 20D at last

Martin.



You've forgotten about the D70?

www.kenrockwell.com/tech/20dd70.htm


Ah, the wonderfully unopinionated, unbiased Ken Rockwell - always a useful authority

V6GTO

11,579 posts

248 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
imperialism2024 said:

V6GTO said:
A Nikon camera to worry the 20D at last

Martin.



You've forgotten about the D70?



Mmmmm....with 3/4 the pixels and no 100iso you think it's a match?...interesting.

Martin.

simpo two

Original Poster:

86,911 posts

271 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
V6GTO said:
Mmmmm....with 3/4 the pixels and no 100iso you think it's a match?...interesting.

In practical terms that makes no difference. My images are quite big enough and sharp enough at 6.1MP and I usually use ISO400 to get a workable shutter speed.

V6GTO

11,579 posts

248 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:

I usually use ISO400 to get a workable shutter speed.


I only use iso100, I think I've taken 3 photos @ iso1600, and they were when the images were intended to be b&w. Good job were not all the same huh?

Martin.

anonymous-user

60 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
V6GTO said:

simpo two said:

I usually use ISO400 to get a workable shutter speed.



I only use iso100, I think I've taken 3 photos @ iso1600, and they were when the images were intended to be b&w. Good job were not all the same huh?

Martin.
Us Dark Sdiers must just have faster glass and superior image stabilization... Or we're just not old enough to have got the shakes just yet so can still hold the camera steady.