Noble at Sundown
Discussion
Comments / feedback?
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%201.jpg[/pic]
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%202.jpg[/pic]
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%204.jpg[/pic]
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%201.jpg[/pic]
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%202.jpg[/pic]
[pic]http://217.204.137.226/Pictures/Owner%27s%20Albums/Joust/M400/Random%20Pictures/Noble%20Sundown%204.jpg[/pic]
Hi Joust,
I think the location in the first one doesnt work, the tree, growing through the roof, signs and blurred light in the background are all distractions, aside from that they are all quite badly underexposed. I guess you shot these on auto metering and the brightness of the sky fooled the camera, second one is probably the best example of that, you can barely see the car there. 3rd one is a nice concept but didnt really work IMO, as there is too much going on: the light, signs, lights etc. and the car is so dark, you cant see any detail in it.
Shooting car photos at sundown can often be fruitless as you have to expose for the car, which potentially means blowing out any nice sunset, best times are about an hour before when there is still plenty of light but it is soft and warm, same at about 6:30-7am at this time of year.
Just a matter of taste here, but Im not so sure such a low sporty car looks good on grass full stop...
Matt
I think the location in the first one doesnt work, the tree, growing through the roof, signs and blurred light in the background are all distractions, aside from that they are all quite badly underexposed. I guess you shot these on auto metering and the brightness of the sky fooled the camera, second one is probably the best example of that, you can barely see the car there. 3rd one is a nice concept but didnt really work IMO, as there is too much going on: the light, signs, lights etc. and the car is so dark, you cant see any detail in it.
Shooting car photos at sundown can often be fruitless as you have to expose for the car, which potentially means blowing out any nice sunset, best times are about an hour before when there is still plenty of light but it is soft and warm, same at about 6:30-7am at this time of year.
Just a matter of taste here, but Im not so sure such a low sporty car looks good on grass full stop...
Matt
Thanks for the comments. It was just a bit of fun, I was actually out for a 'blat' and parked up after a good long run and just shot off a few where I'd parked.
The first one was just me playing with the contrast post shot - the sky was there in the original. I quite liked taking it out though as it brought my eyes to the car, but then I normally do have bad tastes.
Interestingly at work I see what you mean about them all being too dark - I think my monitor may have got seriously out of calibration at home now I look at it as they looked much lighter when I put them up and you could clearly see the car in the second one.
I'll re-run the monitor calibration and see if I can't get things a bit lighter (they were bracket shot in RAW so I have a lot of flexibility).
J
The first one was just me playing with the contrast post shot - the sky was there in the original. I quite liked taking it out though as it brought my eyes to the car, but then I normally do have bad tastes.
Interestingly at work I see what you mean about them all being too dark - I think my monitor may have got seriously out of calibration at home now I look at it as they looked much lighter when I put them up and you could clearly see the car in the second one.
I'll re-run the monitor calibration and see if I can't get things a bit lighter (they were bracket shot in RAW so I have a lot of flexibility).
J
Justin,
I know what lenses you've got, but which body and which flash do you have? And was no.3 taken with the in-camera flash or with an on-camera unit? It seems to me the flash in no.3 wasn't powerful enough. They all seem a bit too contrasty as well(which I quite like actually) Bloody nice subject though
Martin.
I know what lenses you've got, but which body and which flash do you have? And was no.3 taken with the in-camera flash or with an on-camera unit? It seems to me the flash in no.3 wasn't powerful enough. They all seem a bit too contrasty as well(which I quite like actually) Bloody nice subject though
Martin.
My personal favourite is number one, but the grass does let you down a bit. I do like the slightly higher contrast look though - suits the Nobel well.
This is one of those times when I think you need a location such as a slightly broken down old office block or industrial unit as the modern Noble goes well with these more broken down backgrounds
Just my 2p
Chris
This is one of those times when I think you need a location such as a slightly broken down old office block or industrial unit as the modern Noble goes well with these more broken down backgrounds
Just my 2p
Chris
V6GTO said:EOS300D
Justin,
I know what lenses you've got, but which body and which flash do you have? And was no.3 taken with the in-camera flash or with an on-camera unit? It seems to me the flash in no.3 wasn't powerful enough. They all seem a bit too contrasty as well(which I quite like actually) Bloody nice subject though![]()
Martin.
Speedlight 550EX (so not much chance of more power)
The contrast is "fake" in that I did it in the raw processing and used the OptikVerve 'landscape' filter, but like you I happen to like the effect.
3 was in almost total darkness by the time I got around to it (I couldn't even read the focus distance on the lense). If I'd got it earlier I wouldn't have needed to use the flash, but as I said, it was an opportunistic bit of playing around after a blat
J
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






