What Camera please?

Author
Discussion

Spaceman3

Original Poster:

329 posts

169 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
I need some advice please, up until about 10 years ago I used to take a lot of photos and sell a fair few too. One day I just decided to quit and sold my equipment (canon 5d mkii with approx 6-7 canon L Lenses.

Since then I have only used my mobile as a camera. I have now decided to buy another camera but ideally don't want to go down DSLR route. Is there anything out there which anyone can recommend? Budget is ideally capped at £2k.

Julian Scott

2,733 posts

26 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
I did exactly this last year, and ended up with a 2nd hand but perfect condition Leica Q2 from Leica Manchester, granted, above the £2k budget.

I'm so happy with the choice, no fuss, still fairly compact so no big bag & paraphernalia to carry around. Only take it for more special trips/event, my iPhone being a more than suitable choice for quick snaps. A quick look at the folder on the phone shows I've taken just under 1,500 shots on 10 months.

Tony1963

4,890 posts

164 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Spaceman3 said:
I need some advice please, up until about 10 years ago I used to take a lot of photos and sell a fair few too. One day I just decided to quit and sold my equipment (canon 5d mkii with approx 6-7 canon L Lenses.

Since then I have only used my mobile as a camera. I have now decided to buy another camera but ideally don't want to go down DSLR route. Is there anything out there which anyone can recommend? Budget is ideally capped at £2k.
I’ve just deleted my initial reply, as I misread the bit about “don’t want to go down the dslr route” as “do” lol.

What do you see yourself photographing?

Spaceman3

Original Poster:

329 posts

169 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Julian Scott said:
I did exactly this last year, and ended up with a 2nd hand but perfect condition Leica Q2 from Leica Manchester, granted, above the £2k budget.

I'm so happy with the choice, no fuss, still fairly compact so no big bag & paraphernalia to carry around. Only take it for more special trips/event, my iPhone being a more than suitable choice for quick snaps. A quick look at the folder on the phone shows I've taken just under 1,500 shots on 10 months.
Hmmm, now I am thinking about budget.

Spaceman3

Original Poster:

329 posts

169 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
I’ve just deleted my initial reply, as I misread the bit about “don’t want to go down the dslr route” as “do” lol.

What do you see yourself photographing?
Everything really, but mainly landscapes, seascapes, street scenes.

Tony1963

4,890 posts

164 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Spaceman3 said:
Everything really, but mainly landscapes, seascapes, street scenes.
In that case the Q2 might be ideal..? Wonderful image quality.

Derek Smith

45,887 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Spaceman, go to a camera shop and handle a few of the newer ones. Discuss your wishes and needs with the staff.

I was allowed to play with an MFT camera, the sales staff suggesting I try them because of my requirements for light weight. Hadn't considered going that way before going in. I opted for a cheap, second hand model, a GH2, with their promise of returning the money if I bought a new MFT camera within a month. Which I did, although I still have the GH2.

Not that I'm suggesting you go MFT, but merely go to a camera shop with lots of stock.

What I will suggest is that a camera that 'fits' your hands, and feels good to you, is one to consider carefully.

Spaceman3

Original Poster:

329 posts

169 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Derek, that would be ideal. Unfortunately I am in rural Cornwall.

craig1912

3,408 posts

114 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Thing is virtually any camera will do as new DSLRs aren’t really a thing anymore.

What are you going to do with the photos?
Do you want to change lenses?

A Q2 is a decent choice but over budget and do you need a full frame and would you be happy with a fixed focal length.

I’ve used Fuji, Olympus and Sony. Decided I didn’t need full frame so now have Fuji with a couple of zooms and a couple of primes. Small (camera and lenses) great out of camera jpegs and lots of film sims and “recipes” to play with.

An alternative to the Q2 within budget would be a Fuji X100 v or vi(if you can wait).

BrokenSkunk

4,611 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Spaceman3 said:
Everything really, but mainly landscapes, seascapes, street scenes.
So wide angle, large depth of field, small aperture. Good lighting conditions: low ISO.

A phone camera will do all of that and with a good one you'll struggle to notice the difference between it and a proper camera. Until you start cropping and enlarging.

A dedicated camera will give you shallower depth of field, more responsive shutter, higher ISO ability with less noise, access to sharper, faster lenses... None of which is really needed for landscapes.

Yeah I know I'm going to get flamed by the landscape fanatics, what I'm tring to say is that landscapes are what camera phones are best at. A dediacted camera will always be better, but for this application the gap between the two is at it's narrowest.

Of course a camera phone is nowhere near as nice to use as a good camera, that alone is enough for me.

Tony1963

4,890 posts

164 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Oh if only landscapes were only for wide lenses…

Derek Smith

45,887 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd May
quotequote all
Spaceman3 said:
Derek, that would be ideal. Unfortunately I am in rural Cornwall.
Are there any local camera clubs?

Craikeybaby

10,462 posts

227 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
By "not a DSLR", do you mean something smaller with a built in lens? Or could something smaller with interchangeable lenses work?

I initially went from full frame with L lenses to a smaller APSC system, which did make a difference, to the point I ended up shooting more and bought better (read bigger) lenses, but whilst still smaller than full frame, were getting big again, so I added a second smaller camera with a fixed lens.

Large sensor/fixed lens cameras seem to be popular at the moment, the Leica Q2/3, the Rich GR and my personal favourite the Fuji X100. The main problem seems to be availability. I use my X100V for a bit of everything, including the odd sports photo:
DH Pan by Lewis Craik, on Flickr

But that is in addition to a separate interchangeable lens set up, as I definitely couldn't cover everything I need to with it.

Getting a camera in your hand, and especially using it for a few days, is the best way to get to know a system. Various camera brands do a " free try before you buy" service, certainly at least Fuji and Canon do, which I thoroughly recommend using.



Edited by Craikeybaby on Thursday 23 May 11:31

toohuge

3,436 posts

218 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
I understand where you're coming from OP.

I am thinking of adding a Panasonic (preview / reviews released today) S9 - looks ideal as an affordable full frame fixed lens option. Much as I love the Leica's, they are really expensive.

Craikeybaby

10,462 posts

227 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
I got excited there - it isn't a fixed lens camera, although it looks good with the lens in all the reviews. Until you see that it is an f/8 lens. Hard pass from me.

Spaceman3

Original Poster:

329 posts

169 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
Thanks for all replies, I too got excited by Panasonic. I think I am aiming for something which just isn't there for ideal budget. Now looking into Nikon Z 6 ii...

Technotronic

70 posts

10 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
Spaceman3 said:
Everything really, but mainly landscapes, seascapes, street scenes.
Ricoh GR3.

You can thank me later.

Julian Scott

2,733 posts

26 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all


Can't see if it's a Panasonic body with Leica lense, but the D-Lux 7 was good regardless.

Actual

796 posts

108 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
This contribution won't be popular but...

I used to have all the Nikon gear but lugging all that glass around including a 70-200 2.8 was a real chore so I changed to a Panasonic DC-TZ90 but it still made a huge bulge in my pocket.

So now I manage with my Google Pixel 7 and it is always there and ready.

All the above are roughly capable of 30x zoom but the photo editing capability on the Pixel is out of this world.

All photos go onto a One Drive share and all the computers in the house run a photo screensaver.

Tony1963

4,890 posts

164 months

Thursday 23rd May
quotequote all
You REALLY don’t have to lug loads of gear around just because you have interchangeable lenses. Many zoom lenses are excellent now, and with mirrorless especially, f/2.8 is no longer the holy grail. Even less so with landscapes etc.

The world has changed, and unless you’re shooting for a glossy magazine, embrace it and enjoy it.