Comments please............
Comments please............
Author
Discussion

Mr Noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Wednesday 1st March 2006
quotequote all
As I didn't win the comp this month and never posted this in the first thread I wonder if you well versed chaps could constructivly critisise my effort as I am taking it all on board at the moment in an effort to improve.

Any feedback would be good. (except from V6 GTO)

Greg


Mr Noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Wednesday 1st March 2006
quotequote all


Original here.
G

740i

290 posts

270 months

Wednesday 1st March 2006
quotequote all
I'm not well versed Greg, but think your superb image would make a great "unplugged" album cover.

simpo two

92,900 posts

295 months

Wednesday 1st March 2006
quotequote all
Original image is under-exposed and to my mind the effect doesn't work, it just looks as if something's gone wrong. I'm not sure there's enough interest in the picture to make anything.

Well you did ask

NB If there's not enough info, double it



>> Edited by simpo two on Wednesday 1st March 21:23

up-the-dubs

4,282 posts

259 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
simpo two said:
Original image is under-exposed and to my mind the effect doesn't work, it just looks as if something's gone wrong. I'm not sure there's enough interest in the picture to make anything.


What difference would more exposure bring? (reading books now, but sometimes it's tough to figure what the book is talking about )
Cheers.

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
up-the-dubs said:
simpo two said:
Original image is under-exposed and to my mind the effect doesn't work, it just looks as if something's gone wrong. I'm not sure there's enough interest in the picture to make anything.


What difference would more exposure bring? (reading books now, but sometimes it's tough to figure what the book is talking about )
Cheers.


More exposure would make everything brighter ;-)

So if you look at the original image, I would expect the socket to be white . . . but it's grey . . . and thus probably underexposed . . .

Fd

Mr Noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Agreed, but the correct exposure made it look to white and not contrasty enough.

Agreed also that its was tough to make a socket look interesting, but that was the point of the exercise.

Greg

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Greg...you're so hurtful!

I agree with Simpo about not having a point of interest in the original shot, but the way it has been manipulated gives a good lift to an ordinary subject. I could see a row of similar images working, or maybe a poster with similar images around the outside and a plug, (processed the same way), in the middle.
I like it.

Martin.

406tm

3,636 posts

283 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Greg

I can see that image of the socket in an electrical parts catalogue. I like it but then, I tend not to look at every pic and dissect it for errors or focal points etc. I think too much emphasis is placed on the rule of thirds, colour balance and points of interest. At the end of the day, if you like it, it matters not what others think.

Just my 2p worth

Dave

406TM

twelve_75

184 posts

259 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
I really like what simpo's done with the reverse black and white neg.

Adds depth to the image to a great level IMO. Don't flame me please

te51cle

2,342 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
My thought with the power theme was that the power is switched on but nothing was plugged in. Also there seem to be two halves to the image, the left half with the holes for the socket and the right half with the switches. Needs something to link the two together compositionally and philosophically - a swirl of light from a torch bulb or some LEDs for example.

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Mr Noble said:
Agreed, but the correct exposure made it look to white and not contrasty enough.


but don't you think the top image that simpo posted is both whiter and more contrasty ?

Fd

Mr Noble

Original Poster:

6,538 posts

263 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
I guess, Simpo corrected the white balance in the top shot.

I like that double shot too.


Thanks for the comments guys. It all helps.

Greg

simpo two

92,900 posts

295 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
Mr Noble said:
I guess, Simpo corrected the white balance in the top shot.

Nope, just corrected the levels then made it B/W. WB is about colour; there is no colour

beano500

20,854 posts

305 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
simpo two said:
WB is about colour; there is no colour
Wow - how surreal is it all?!!

White Balance is about colour...

White is ALL colours....

In Black and White there is no colour...

In Black and White, there is no White Balance....



















Where's the Black Balance, then???




simpo two

92,900 posts

295 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
beano500 said:
Where's the Black Balance, then???

Luckily black is too dark for any problems to show...

Perhaps we should talk about Levels rather than Balance.